Communities of Practice of Transition: An Analytical Framework for Studying Change-Focussed Groups

In this article, we consider a previously unidentified form of community of practice: the community of practice of transition. Our exemplar data come from two separate studies, one of a group for trans young people and one of an online divorce support community. Such communities differ from other communities of practice because the transition process itself is the focus and the shared practice of the community. We argue that communities of practice of transition differ from ‘classic’ communities of practice in four main ways. First, and most salient, there are differences in relation to time and its importance. Second, and following from this, there are differences in relation to the focus of trajectories into and through the group, which affect who is able to become a central member. Third, the role and characteristics of central members of the community are different from those found in a traditionally conceived community of practice: moving out of a transitional state (and, therefore, out of the community) is key to old-timer status. Finally, reified events are highly salient in communities of practice of transition, and more important than reified objects. We argue that the concept of a community of practice of transition challenges and expands many of the assumptions underpinning the community of practice as a framework for analysing the dynamics and operation of groups and how identities are forged in and through them. Most significantly, we argue that time needs to be taken more seriously in relation to communities of practice.

[1]  A. Marguerite Who do they think they are and what do they think they are doing? : the construction and establishment of trans and non-binary or genderqueer identities in a trans youth group , 2019 .

[2]  C. Paechter Concepts of Fairness in Marriage and Divorce , 2013 .

[3]  J. Davies Trainee hairdressers’ uses of Facebook as a community of gendered literacy practice 1 , 2013 .

[4]  C. Paechter Researching sensitive issues online: implications of a hybrid insider/outsider position in a retrospective ethnographic study , 2013 .

[5]  C. Paechter Online Learning in Divorce: How the Formation of a Community of Practice in a Divorce Support Website Enables and Inhibits Learning , 2012 .

[6]  A. Danielsson,et al.  Exploring woman university physics students ‘doing gender’ and ‘doing physics’ , 2012 .

[7]  Christopher Koliba,et al.  “Communities of Practice” as an Analytical Construct: Implications for Theory and Practice , 2009 .

[8]  Carrie Paechter,et al.  Being Boys; Being Girls: Learning masculinities and femininities , 2007 .

[9]  Andrew Cox,et al.  What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[10]  C. Paechter Learning masculinities and femininities: power/knowledge and legitimate peripheral participation , 2003 .

[11]  Ana Cristina Ostermann Communities of Practice at Work: Gender, Facework and the Power of Habitus at an All-Female Police Station and a Feminist Crisis Intervention Center in Brazil , 2003 .

[12]  Carrie Paechter,et al.  Masculinities and femininities as communities of practice , 2003 .

[13]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[14]  J. Falla What do they think they are doing , 1997 .

[15]  Douglas Mason-Schrock Transsexuals' narrative construction of the true self , 1996 .

[16]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[17]  R. Montemayor Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. , 1990 .

[18]  Penelope Eckert,et al.  Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School , 1989 .