Strategies of method selection for fine-scale PM2.5 mapping in an intra-urban area using crowdsourced monitoring

Abstract. Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is of great concern to the public due to its significant risk to human health. Numerous methods have been developed to estimate spatial PM2.5 concentrations in unobserved locations due to the sparse number of fixed monitoring stations. Due to an increase in low-cost sensing for air pollution monitoring, crowdsourced monitoring of exposure control has been gradually introduced into cities. However, the optimal mapping method for conventional sparse fixed measurements may not be suitable for this new high-density monitoring approach. This study presents a crowdsourced sampling campaign and strategies of method selection for 100 m scale PM2.5 mapping in an intra-urban area of China. During this process, PM2.5 concentrations were measured by laser air quality monitors through a group of volunteers during two 5 h periods. Three extensively employed modelling methods (ordinary kriging, OK; land use regression, LUR; and regression kriging, RK) were adopted to evaluate the performance. An interesting finding is that PM2.5 concentrations in micro-environments varied in the intra-urban area. These local PM2.5 variations can be easily identified by crowdsourced sampling rather than national air quality monitoring stations. The selection of models for fine-scale PM2.5 concentration mapping should be adjusted according to the changing sampling and pollution circumstances. During this project, OK interpolation performs best in conditions with non-peak traffic situations during a lightly polluted period (holdout validation R2: 0.47–0.82), while the RK modelling can perform better during the heavily polluted period (0.32–0.68) and in conditions with peak traffic and relatively few sampling sites (fewer than ∼100) during the lightly polluted period (0.40–0.69). Additionally, the LUR model demonstrates limited ability in estimating PM2.5 concentrations on very fine spatial and temporal scales in this study (0.04–0.55), which challenges the traditional point about the good performance of the LUR model for air pollution mapping. This method selection strategy provides empirical evidence for the best method selection for PM2.5 mapping using crowdsourced monitoring, and this provides a promising way to reduce the exposure risks for individuals in their daily life.

[1]  M. Brauer,et al.  High-Resolution Air Pollution Mapping with Google Street View Cars: Exploiting Big Data. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  W. Lahoz,et al.  Mapping urban air quality in near real-time using observations from low-cost sensors and model information. , 2017, Environment international.

[3]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[4]  Sanford Weisberg,et al.  An R Companion to Applied Regression , 2010 .

[5]  Jonathan E. Thompson,et al.  Crowd-sourced air quality studies: A review of the literature & portable sensors , 2016 .

[6]  Liang Zhai,et al.  An improved geographically weighted regression model for PM 2.5 concentration estimation in large areas , 2018 .

[7]  Piotr Batog,et al.  Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors for Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring , 2018, J. Sensors.

[8]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale , 2015, Nature.

[9]  Joel Schwartz,et al.  Long-term exposure to traffic emissions and fine particulate matter and lung function decline in the Framingham heart study. , 2015, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[10]  F. Kelly,et al.  A study of particulate emissions during 23 major industrial fires: Implications for human health. , 2018, Environment international.

[11]  George Christakos,et al.  Comparative spatiotemporal analysis of fine particulate matter pollution , 2009 .

[12]  Chris Robertson,et al.  A Comparison of Short-term and Long-term Air Pollution Exposure Associations with Mortality in Two Cohorts in Scotland , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[13]  Matthew L. Thomas,et al.  Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015 , 2017, The Lancet.

[14]  Hyesop Shin,et al.  Ordinary kriging approach to predicting long-term particulate matter concentrations in seven major Korean cities , 2014, Environmental health and toxicology.

[15]  Bin Zou,et al.  High-Resolution Satellite Mapping of Fine Particulates Based on Geographically Weighted Regression , 2016, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[16]  Dongqun Xu,et al.  Characteristics of ambient 1-min PM2.5 variation in Beijing , 2010, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[17]  Ronak Sutaria,et al.  Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[18]  Bin Zou,et al.  Performance comparison of LUR and OK in PM2.5 concentration mapping: a multidimensional perspective , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Sandosh Padmanabhan,et al.  Development, Evaluation, and Comparison of Land Use Regression Modeling Methods to Estimate Residential Exposure to Nitrogen Dioxide in a Cohort Study. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  J. Salmond,et al.  Variations in exposure to traffic pollution while travelling by different modes in a low density, less congested city. , 2013, Environmental pollution.

[21]  Vlad Isakov,et al.  Evaluation of land-use regression models used to predict air quality concentrations in an urban area , 2010 .

[22]  M. El-Harbawi,et al.  Air quality modelling, simulation, and computational methods: a review , 2013 .

[23]  L. Morawska,et al.  The rise of low-cost sensing for managing air pollution in cities. , 2015, Environment international.

[24]  M. Brauer,et al.  Spatiotemporal land use regression models of fine, ultrafine, and black carbon particulate matter in New Delhi, India. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Greg Lindsey,et al.  Population-Level Exposure to Particulate Air Pollution during Active Travel: Planning for Low-Exposure, Health-Promoting Cities , 2016, Environmental health perspectives.

[26]  Roderic L. Jones,et al.  Validating novel air pollution sensors to improve exposure estimates for epidemiological analyses and citizen science , 2017, Environmental research.

[27]  Johan Lindström,et al.  Comparing universal kriging and land-use regression for predicting concentrations of gaseous oxides of nitrogen (NOx) for the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution (MESA Air). , 2011, Atmospheric environment.

[28]  Altaf Arain,et al.  A review and evaluation of intraurban air pollution exposure models , 2005, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[29]  Antonella Zanobetti,et al.  Association of Short-term Exposure to Air Pollution With Mortality in Older Adults , 2017, JAMA.

[30]  Xiaoping Liu,et al.  Satellite-based ground PM 2.5 estimation using timely structure adaptive modeling , 2016 .

[31]  Armistead G. Russell,et al.  Field Test of Several Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in High and Low Concentration Urban Environments. , 2018, Aerosol and air quality research.

[32]  Matthias Ketzel,et al.  Spatial PM2.5, NO2, O3 and BC models for Western Europe - Evaluation of spatiotemporal stability. , 2018, Environment international.

[33]  Jin Li,et al.  Spatial interpolation methods applied in the environmental sciences: A review , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[34]  Bert Brunekreef,et al.  Land use regression models for estimating individual NOx and NO₂ exposures in a metropolis with a high density of traffic roads and population. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[35]  R. Harrison,et al.  Vertical variation of PM2.5 mass and chemical composition, particle size distribution, NO2, and BTEX at a high rise building. , 2018, Environmental pollution.

[36]  David E Williams,et al.  Low-cost sensors and crowd-sourced data: Observations of siting impacts on a network of air-quality instruments. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[37]  Troy Sternberg,et al.  A hybrid Grey-Markov/ LUR model for PM10 concentration prediction under future urban scenarios , 2018, Atmospheric Environment.

[38]  Christian Heipke,et al.  Crowdsourcing geospatial data , 2010 .

[39]  Matthew G. Falk,et al.  Vertical particle concentration profiles around urban office buildings , 2012 .

[40]  M. Bell,et al.  A study on modeling nitrogen dioxide concentrations using land-use regression and conventionally used exposure assessment methods , 2017 .

[41]  Michael Brauer,et al.  Application of land use regression to estimate long-term concentrations of traffic-related nitrogen oxides and fine particulate matter. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Increased Oxidative Burden Associated with Traffic Component of Ambient Particulate Matter at Roadside and Urban Background Schools Sites in London , 2011, PloS one.

[43]  B. Brunekreef,et al.  Systematic evaluation of land use regression models for NO₂. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[44]  Guofeng Cao,et al.  Improve ground-level PM2.5 concentration mapping using a random forests-based geostatistical approach. , 2018, Environmental Pollution.