Investigation of the optical backscattering to scattering ratio of marine particles in relation to their biogeochemical composition in the eastern English Channel and southern North Sea

The variability of the backscattering to scattering ratio of marine particles, bbp : bp, is examined from in situ measurements performed during the spring and early summer of 2004 in the eastern English Channel and southern North Sea. This area is characterized by a quasi-permanent background of mineral matter from direct inputs, or resuspension effects, and by relatively intense spring phytoplankton blooms (mainly diatoms and the prymnesiophyte Phaeocystis globosa). The bbp : bp surface values range between 0.0024 and 0.0417, with a mean value of 0.0138 6 0.0083. In order to interpret such a great variability, simultaneous water samples were collected for the biogeochemical characterization of the bulk suspended particle population. We show that the bbp : bp variability is related to the composition of the particulate assemblage expressed by Chl a, the POC : SPM and POC : Chl a ratios, where Chl a, POC, and SPM are the concentrations of chlorophyll a, particulate organic carbon, and suspended particulate matter, respectively. Low bbp : bp values are observed for a particle population dominated by low refractive index material such as phytoplankton, whereas high bbp : bp values are generally observed in presence of relatively high concentration of inorganic particles. The amount of organic material (both living and nonliving, including phytoplankton) relative to phytoplankton has a strong (and sometimes the greatest) effect on the backscattering-to-scattering ratio. Assuming that phytoplankton and detritus have similar refractive index, this pattern is interpreted as resulting from changes in the particle size distribution as well as by aggregation of mineral and nonliving organic detrital material. The backscattering coefficient (bb ;m 21) and the detailed understanding of its variability in natural waters are of fundamental importance for oceanographic sciences related to the knowledge of suspended marine particles. The backscattering coefficient is also of primary importance for remote sensing of ocean color, as the radiometric signal recorded by a sensor onboard an aircraft or a satellite is directly proportional to its intensity. However, ‘‘our presentday interpretation and detailed understanding of major sources of backscattering and its variability in the ocean are uncertain and controversial’’ (Stramski et al. 2004). Until the

[1]  James C. Kitchen,et al.  On the noncorrelation of the vertical structure of light scattering and chlorophyll α in case I waters , 1990 .

[2]  J R Zaneveld,et al.  Absorption and attenuation of visible and near-infrared light in water: dependence on temperature and salinity. , 1997, Applied optics.

[3]  R. Maffione,et al.  Instruments and methods for measuring the backward-scattering coefficient of ocean waters. , 1997, Applied optics.

[4]  G. Zibordi,et al.  Marine optical measurements of a mucilage event in the northern Adriatic Sea , 2000 .

[5]  A Morel,et al.  Modeling the light attenuation and scattering by spherical phytoplanktonic cells: a retrieval of the bulk refractive index. , 1988, Applied optics.

[6]  Y. Ahn,et al.  Optical efficiency factors of free-living marine bacteria: Influence of bacterioplankton upon the optical properties and particulate organic carbon in oceanic waters , 1990 .

[7]  Xiaodong Zhang,et al.  The volume scattering function of natural bubble populations , 2002 .

[8]  Dariusz Stramski,et al.  The role of seawater constituents in light backscattering in the ocean , 2004 .

[9]  M. J. Richardson,et al.  Biophysical forcing of particle production and distribution during a spring bloom in the North Atlantic , 1993 .

[10]  C. Lorenzen,et al.  DETERMINATION OF CHLOROPHYLL AND PHEO‐PIGMENTS: SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC EQUATIONS1 , 1967 .

[11]  James C. Kitchen,et al.  The variation in the inherent optical properties of phytoplankton near an absorption peak as determined by various models of cell structure , 1995 .

[12]  A. Barnard,et al.  Global relationships of the inherent optical properties of the oceans , 1998 .

[13]  P. Verity,et al.  Visualization and quantification of plankton and detritus using digital confocal microscopy , 1996 .

[14]  C. Lancelot.  The mucilage phenomenon in the continental coastal waters of the North Sea , 1995 .

[15]  S. Maritorena,et al.  Bio-optical properties of oceanic waters: A reappraisal , 2001 .

[16]  C. Mobley,et al.  Phase function effects on oceanic light fields. , 2002, Applied optics.

[17]  William M. Balch,et al.  Light backscattering properties of marine phytoplankton: relationships to cell size, chemical composition and taxonomy , 2004 .

[18]  Marcel Babin,et al.  Variations of light absorption by suspended particles with chlorophyll a concentration in oceanic (case 1) waters: Analysis and implications for bio-optical models , 1998 .

[19]  Michael S. Twardowski,et al.  Particulate backscattering ratio at LEO 15 and its use to study particle composition and distribution , 2004 .

[20]  R. Arnone,et al.  Spectral dependence of the scattering coefficient in case 1 and case 2 waters. , 1999, Applied optics.

[21]  Michael S Twardowski,et al.  Use of optical scattering to discriminate particle types in coastal waters. , 2005, Applied optics.

[22]  T Platt,et al.  Effect of the particle-size distribution on the backscattering ratio in seawater. , 1994, Applied optics.

[23]  B. Sautour,et al.  Annual variations of phytoplankton biomass in the Eastern English Channel: comparison by pigment signatures and microscopic counts , 2000 .

[24]  Dale A. Kiefer,et al.  Light scattering by microorganisms in the open ocean , 1991 .

[25]  D. Harbour,et al.  In situ copepod feeding and grazing rates during a spring bloom dominated by Phaeocystis sp. in the English Channel , 1992 .

[26]  Sean G. Herring,et al.  Shape of the particulate beam attenuation spectrum and its inversion to obtain the shape of the particulate size distribution. , 2001, Applied optics.

[27]  Christophe Brunet,et al.  Hydrography and Phytoplankton Biomass in the Eastern English Channel in Spring 1992 , 1996 .

[28]  Annick Bricaud,et al.  In situ methods for measuring the inherent optical properties of ocean waters , 1995 .

[29]  G. Cadée,et al.  Phaeocystis blooms and eutrophication of the continental coastal zones of the North Sea , 1992 .

[30]  Andrew H. Barnard,et al.  A model for estimating bulk refractive index from the optical backscattering ratio and the implications for understanding particle composition in case I and case II waters , 2001 .

[31]  Malik Chami,et al.  Optical properties of the particles in the Crimea coastal waters (Black Sea) , 2005 .

[32]  André Morel,et al.  Optics of heterotrophic nanoflagellates and ciliates : a tentative assessment of their scattering role in oceanic waters compared to those of bacterial and algal cells , 1991 .

[33]  Dariusz Stramski,et al.  Light scattering properties of marine particles in coastal and open ocean waters as related to the particle mass concentration , 2003 .

[34]  M. Jonasz.  Particle‐size distributions in the Baltic , 1983 .

[35]  André Morel,et al.  Light scattering and chlorophyll concentration in case 1 waters: A reexamination , 1998 .