The role of Proteus mirabilis cell wall features in biofilm formation

Biofilms formed by Proteus mirabilis strains are a serious medical problem, especially in the case of urinary tract infections. Early stages of biofilm formation, such as reversible and irreversible adhesion, are essential for bacteria to form biofilm and avoid eradication by antibiotic therapy. Adhesion to solid surfaces is a complex process where numerous factors play a role, where hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions with solid surface seem to be substantial. Cell surface hydrophobicity and electrokinetic potential of bacterial cells depend on their surface composition and structure, where lipopolysaccharide, in Gram-negative bacteria, is prevailing. Our studies focused on clinical and laboratory P. mirabilis strains, where laboratory strains have determined LPS structures. Adherence and biofilm formation tests revealed significant differences between strains adhered in early stages of biofilm formation. Amounts of formed biofilm were expressed by the absorption of crystal violet. Higher biofilm amounts were formed by the strains with more negative values of zeta potential. In contrast, high cell surface hydrophobicity correlated with low biofilm amount.

[1]  Arto S. Baghdayan,et al.  Enterococcal Surface Protein, Esp, Enhances Biofilm Formation by Enterococcus faecalis , 2004, Infection and Immunity.

[2]  Shinya Matsumoto,et al.  Bacterial adhesion: From mechanism to control , 2010 .

[3]  G. Di Bonaventura,et al.  Factors associated with adherence to and biofilm formation on polystyrene by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: the role of cell surface hydrophobicity and motility. , 2008, FEMS microbiology letters.

[4]  P. Vandamme,et al.  Burkholderia ambifaria sp. nov., a novel member of the Burkholderia cepacia complex including biocontrol and cystic fibrosis-related isolates. , 2001, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[5]  A. Fouet,et al.  Biofilm Formation and Cell Surface Properties among Pathogenic and Nonpathogenic Strains of the Bacillus cereus Group , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[6]  N. Sobczak,et al.  The effect of temperature, matrix alloying and substrate coatings on wettability and shear strength of Al/Al2O3 couples , 2004 .

[7]  T. Coenye,et al.  Phenotypic characterization of an international Pseudomonas aeruginosa reference panel: strains of cystic fibrosis (CF) origin show less in vivo virulence than non-CF strains. , 2015, Microbiology.

[8]  E. Skwarek,et al.  Effect of zeta potential value on bacterial behavior during electrophoretic separation , 2010, Electrophoresis.

[9]  P. Stewart,et al.  Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in bacterial biofilms. , 2002, International journal of medical microbiology : IJMM.

[10]  J. Dziadek,et al.  Influence of quorum sensing signal molecules on biofilm formation in Proteus mirabilis O18 , 2011, Folia Microbiologica.

[11]  Malte Hermansson,et al.  The DLVO theory in microbial adhesion , 1999 .

[12]  K. Lounatmaa,et al.  Surface Structure, Hydrophobicity, Phagocytosis, and Adherence to Matrix Proteins of Bacillus cereus Cells with and without the Crystalline Surface Protein Layer , 1998, Infection and Immunity.

[13]  K. Myszka,et al.  Bacterial Biofilms on Food Contact Surfaces - a Review , 2011 .

[14]  W. Kaca,et al.  Morphological changes in Proteus mirabilis O18 biofilm under the influence of a urease inhibitor and a homoserine lactone derivative , 2014, Archives of Microbiology.

[15]  W. Białas,et al.  Cell surface hydrophobicity of Bacillus spp. as a function of nutrient supply and lipopeptides biosynthesis and its role in adhesion. , 2008, Polish journal of microbiology.

[16]  Z. Dzierżewicz,et al.  [The structural diversity of lipid A from gram-negative bacteria]. , 2007, Postepy higieny i medycyny doswiadczalnej.

[17]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Electrophoretic mobility and hydrophobicity as a measured to predict the initial steps of bacterial adhesion , 1987, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[18]  Rosário Oliveira,et al.  Exopolymers in bacterial adhesion: interpretation in terms of DLVO and XDLVO theories , 1999 .

[19]  J. Remon,et al.  Kinetics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa adhesion to 304 and 316-L stainless steel: role of cell surface hydrophobicity , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[20]  G. O’Toole Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. , 2011, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[21]  H. Mobley,et al.  Complicated Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections Due to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis , 2008, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[22]  J. So,et al.  Altered cell surface hydrophobicity of lipopolysaccharide-deficient mutant of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. , 2000, Journal of microbiological methods.

[23]  David S. Jones,et al.  Standardisation and comparison of methods employed for microbial cell surface hydrophobicity and charge determination , 1996 .

[24]  S. Wai,et al.  A multivariate approach to correlate bacterial surface properties to biofilm formation by lipopolysaccharide mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 2015, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.