A Study on Students’ Views On Blended Learning Environment

In the 21st century, information and communication technologies (ICT) have developed rapidly and influenced most of the fields and education as well. Then, ICT have offered a favorable environment for the development and use of various methods and tools. With the developments in technology, blended learning has gained considerable popularity in recent years. Together with the developments it brought along the description of particular forms of teaching with technology. Blended learning is defined simply as a learning environment that combines technology with face-to-face learning. In other words blended learning means using a variety of delivery methods to best meet the course objectives by combining face-to-face teaching in a traditional classroom with teaching online. This article examines students’ views on blended learning environment. The study was conducted on 64 students from Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technologies in 2005–2006 fall semester in Instructional Design and Authoring Languages in PC Environment at Hacettepe University. The results showed that the students enjoyed taking part in the blended learning environment. Students’ achievement levels and their frequency of participation to forum affected their views about blended learning environment. Face-to-face interaction in blended learning application had the highest score. This result demonstrated the importance of interaction and communication for the success of on-line learning.

[1]  Bill McCampbell Blending the Basics. , 2001 .

[2]  Younghee M. Kim,et al.  Emerging themes of student satisfaction in a traditional course and a blended distance course , 2003 .

[3]  Margaret Gorts Morabito Foundations of Distance Education. , 1997 .

[4]  Larry R. Irons,et al.  Blended Learning and Learner Satisfaction: Keys to User Acceptance?. , 2002 .

[5]  Tom Duffy,et al.  An Instructional Design Model for Online Problem Based Learning (PBL) Environments: The Learning To Teach with Technology Studio. , 2000 .

[6]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Blended Learning Environments: Definitions and Directions. , 2003 .

[7]  Rosemary Blieszner,et al.  PROMISES AND PITFALLS OF THE INTERACTIVE TELEVISION APPROACH TO TEACHING ADULT DEVELOPMENT AND AGING , 1999 .

[8]  G. Hanley e‐Learning and the Science of Instruction , 2004 .

[9]  Ann Barron,et al.  Designing Web-based Training , 1998, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[10]  Gary Greenberg,et al.  Distance education technologies: best practices for K-12 settings , 1998, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[11]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[12]  A. Paivio Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[13]  David D. Williams,et al.  Case 3: Bringing Off-Campus Students on Campus: An Evaluation of a Blended Course , 2003 .

[14]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[15]  Buket Akkoyunlu,et al.  Türetimci çoklu ortam öğrenme kuramı , 2005 .

[16]  Trudy K. Christensen Case 1: Finding the Balance: Constructivist Pedagogy in a Blended Course , 2003 .

[17]  S. Coulson,et al.  Blending basics , 2000 .

[18]  Saul Carliner Overview of On-Line Learning , 1999 .

[19]  Pam Northrup,et al.  A Framework for Designing Interactivity into Web-based Instruction. , 2001 .

[20]  Desmond Keegan,et al.  Distance Education Technology for the New Millennium Compressed Video Teaching. ZIFF Papiere 101. , 1995 .