Efficient approach to early detection of lithographic hotspots using machine learning systems and pattern matching

Early lithographic hotspot detection has become increasingly important in achieving lithography-friendly designs and manufacturability closure. Fast physical verification tools employing pattern matching or machine learning techniques have emerged as great options for detecting hotspots in the early design stages. In this work, we propose a characterization methodology that provides measurable quantification of a given hotspot detection tool's capability to capture a previously seen or unseen hotspot pattern. Using this methodology, we conduct a side-by-side comparison of two hotspot detection methods-one using pattern matching and the other based on machine learning. The experimental results reveal that machine learning classifiers are capable of predicting unseen samples but may mispredict some of its training samples. On the other hand, pattern matching-based tools exhibit poorer predictive capability but guarantee full and fast detection on all their training samples. Based on these observations, we propose a hybrid detection solution that utilizes both pattern matching and machine learning techniques. Experimental results show that the hybrid solution combines the strengths of both algorithms and delivers improved detection accuracy while sacrificing little runtime efficiency.

[1]  David Z. Pan,et al.  Machine learning based lithographic hotspot detection with critical-feature extraction and classification , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on IC Design and Technology.

[2]  Yici Cai,et al.  Efficient range pattern matching algorithm for process-hotspot detection , 2008, IET Circuits Devices Syst..

[3]  Fedor G. Pikus,et al.  High Performance Lithography Hotspot Detection with Hierarchically Refined Machine Learning Methods , 2010 .

[4]  Fedor G. Pikus,et al.  High performance lithographic hotspot detection using hierarchically refined machine learning , 2011, 16th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC 2011).

[5]  Jie Yang,et al.  DRC Plus: augmenting standard DRC with pattern matching on 2D geometries , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Malgorzata Marek-Sadowska,et al.  Detecting context sensitive hot spots in standard cell libraries , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Costas J. Spanos,et al.  Clustering and pattern matching for an automatic hotspot classification and detection system , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Juhwan Kim,et al.  Hotspot detection on post-OPC layout using full-chip simulation-based verification tool: a case study with aerial image simulation , 2003, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[9]  Andrew B. Kahng,et al.  Fast Dual-Graph-Based Hotspot Filtering , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[10]  Malgorzata Marek-Sadowska,et al.  Rapid layout pattern classification , 2011, 16th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC 2011).