The mobile phone, perpetual contact and time pressure

Mobile phone services are now universally diffused, creating the possibility of perpetual contact, regardless of time and location. Many think the impossibility of being ‘out of touch’ leads to increased time pressure. In addition to claims that the mobile phone has led to harried leisure, others have argued that perpetual contact extends work into the home or intensifies work in other ways. In this article, these issues are explored using survey data employing some novel methodologies — combining a questionnaire with logs of phone traffic recovered from respondents’ handsets and a purpose-designed time-diary of technology use. Overall, results show that mobile phone use is not associated with more harried leisure. Fears of work intruding into home life appear to be exaggerated. However, there is some evidence that frequent use of mobiles during working hours is associated with work intensification, at least among men.

[1]  Christopher A. Higgins,et al.  From 9 to 5 to 24/7: How Technology has Redefined the Workday , 2007 .

[2]  B. Wellman.  Physical Place and Cyberplace: The Rise of Personalized Networking , 2001 .

[3]  N. Thrift.  New Urban Eras and Old Technological Fears: Reconfiguring the Goodwill of Electronic Things , 1996 .

[4]  Je Agar,et al.  Constant Touch: a Global History of the Mobile Phone , 2004 .

[5]  S. B. Linder,et al.  The Harried Leisure Class , 1970 .

[6]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  How users matter : The co-construction of users and technologies , 2003 .

[7]  Mark Tomlinson,et al.  ‘Pressed for Time’ – the Differential Impacts of a ‘Time Squeeze’ , 2005 .

[8]  Anandam P. Kavoori,et al.  Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective , 2009 .

[9]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[10]  F. Green.  It's been a hard day's night: The concentration and intensification of work in late 20th century Britain , 1999 .

[11]  J. Wajcman,et al.  Families without Borders: Mobile Phones, Connectedness and Work-Home Divisions , 2008 .

[12]  Francis Green,et al.  It’s Been A Hard Day’s Night: The Concentration and Intensification of Work in Late Twentieth-Century Britain , 2001 .

[13]  Cheryl Geisler,et al.  Work–life boundary management and the personal digital assistant , 2007 .

[14]  Noelle Chesley.  Blurring Boundaries? Linking Technology Use, Spillover, Individual Distress, and Family Satisfaction , 2005 .

[15]  A. Bruni.  The Social Shaping of Technology (2nd ed.) , 2003 .

[16]  M. Castells.  Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society , 2000 .

[17]  H. Rosa.  Social Acceleration: Ethical and Political Consequences of a Desynchronized High–Speed Society , 2003 .

[18]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[19]  Eleazar Parmly.  Address , 1846, The American journal of dental science.

[20]  Juliet B. Schor,et al.  The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline Of Leisure , 1991 .

[21]  James Gleick,et al.  Faster: The Acceleration of Just About Everything , 1999 .

[22]  Alan Felstead,et al.  Changing Places of Work , 2005 .

[23]  Juliet B. Schor,et al.  The Overspent American: Why We Want What We Don't Need , 1997 .

[24]  Nicola Green,et al.  On the Move: Technology, Mobility, and the Mediation of Social Time and Space , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[25]  N. Fligstein,et al.  Work in the Postindustrial Economy of California , 2002 .

[26]  F. Green,et al.  Computers are even more important than you thought: an analysis of the changing skill-intensity of jobs , 2000 .

[27]  F. Green,et al.  The intensification of work in Europe , 2001 .

[28]  J. Urry.  Sociology beyond societies : mobilities for the twenty-first century , 2000 .

[29]  David J. Maume,et al.  The ‘Over-Paced’ American: Recent Trends in the Intensification of Work , 2007 .

[30]  S. Hill,et al.  Market, Class, and Employment , 2008 .

[31]  J. Wajcman.  Life in the fast lane? Towards a sociology of technology and time. , 2008, The British journal of sociology.

[32]  Carol Kaufman-Scarborough,et al.  Time Use and the Impact of Technology , 2006 .

[33]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  Book Review: Information and Communication Technologies in Everyday Life: A Concise Introduction and Research Guide , 2006, New Media Soc..

[34]  Mark Aakhus,et al.  Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance , 2002 .

[35]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time , 1998 .

[36]  Christian Licoppe,et al.  ‘Connected’ Presence: The Emergence of a New Repertoire for Managing Social Relationships in a Changing Communication Technoscape , 2004 .

[37]  F. Green.  Why Has Work Effort Become More Intense? , 2004 .

[38]  F. Green.  Work Intensification, Discretion, and the Decline in Well-Being at Work , 2004 .

[39]  Michael E. Lazarus,et al.  PRESsed for time. , 2009, Journal of hospital medicine.

[40]  Lane Kenworthy,et al.  Product Review: Demanding Work: The Paradox of Job Quality in the Affluent Economy , 2007 .

[41]  A. Giddens.  The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[42]  F. Green,et al.  Union Power, Cost of Job Loss, and Workers' Effort , 1998 .