Transcending Simple Forms of School Science Investigation:The Impact of Preservice Instruction on Teachers’ Understandings of Model-Based Inquiry

This study examined 21 preservice secondary teachers as they engaged in activities aimed at fostering an understanding of the epistemic roles that models, theory, and argument play in scientific inquiry. Findings indicate that instruction can help preservice teachers develop more sophisticated understandings of scientific models and promote incorporation of model-based lessons in their classrooms. However, even with scaffolding, the majority of these preservice teachers were unable to use theoretical models to ground their own empirical investigations. Two factors shaped participants’ thinking about these inquiries. One was previous school-related research experience, which influenced not only what they recognized as models but also the way they believed models could be incorporated into inquiry. The other was a widely held simplistic view of “the scientific method” that constrained the procedures and epistemic frameworks they used for investigations. On the basis of these findings, the authors offer a more focused, evidence-based design for instruction around model-based inquiry.

[1]  C. Darwin,et al.  Autobiography of Charles Darwin , 1887 .

[2]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Modeling Natural Variation Through Distribution , 2004 .

[3]  Milton Glaser,et al.  Reinventing Undergraduate Education: Three Years After the Boyer Report. , 2001 .

[4]  M. Stein,et al.  Mathematical Tasks and Student Cognition: Classroom-Based Factors That Support and Inhibit High-Level Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning. , 1997 .

[5]  The Diffusion and Appropriation of Ideas: An Investigation of Events Occurring Between Groups of Learners in Science Classrooms , 2000 .

[6]  John D. Bransford,et al.  The Jasper Project: Lessons in Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Professional Development , 1997 .

[7]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  The Scientific Image , 1980 .

[8]  T. Kuhn The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[9]  M. Windschitl The diffusion and appropriation of ideas in the science classroom: Developing a taxonomy of events occurring between groups of learners , 2001 .

[10]  William A. Sandoval,et al.  High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit , 2003 .

[11]  渋江 靖弘,et al.  Science for All Americans , 1990 .

[12]  Harvey Mellar,et al.  Learning with artificial worlds: computer based modelling in the curriculum , 1994 .

[13]  N. Nersessian The Cognitive Basis of Science: The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science , 2002 .

[14]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  Problem Solving as a Basis for Reform in Curriculum and Instruction: The Case of Mathematics , 1996 .

[15]  S. Stich,et al.  The cognitive basis of science , 2002 .

[16]  Frederick Aicken The Nature of Science , 1991 .

[17]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Reconsidering the Character and Role of Inquiry in School Science: Framing the Debates , 2008 .

[18]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Scientific and Technological Thinking , 2006 .

[19]  R. A. Engle,et al.  Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2002 .

[20]  D. Lamb The Advancement of Science. Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions , 1994 .

[21]  Judit N. Moschkovich,et al.  Resources for Refining Mathematical Conceptions: Case Studies in Learning About Linear Functions , 1998 .

[22]  C. Darwin,et al.  Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809-1882 , 1969 .

[23]  Identifiers Australia,et al.  Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching , 1999 .

[24]  V. Voith,et al.  Principles of learning. , 1986, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice.

[25]  Margaret Morrison,et al.  Models as Mediators , 1999 .

[26]  J. Creswell,et al.  Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design , 1998 .

[27]  Joanne Elizabeth Lobato,et al.  Transfer reconceived : how "sameness" is produced in mathematical activity , 1996 .

[28]  B. White,et al.  Metamodeling Knowledge: Developing Students' Understanding of Scientific Modeling , 2005 .

[29]  Rosária Justi,et al.  Science teachers' knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science , 2002 .

[30]  David Hestenes,et al.  Modeling Software for Learning and Doing Physics , 1995 .

[31]  Steven J. Stratford,et al.  Model-It : A Case Study of Learner-Centered Design Software for Supporting Model Building , 2022 .

[32]  Mark Windschitl,et al.  Folk theories of “inquiry:” How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method , 2004 .

[33]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural , 1998 .

[34]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Authentic school science : knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories , 1995 .

[35]  Yvonne J. Meichtry Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development , 1992 .

[36]  Stephen M. Alessi,et al.  Multimedia for Learning: Methods and Development , 2000 .

[37]  P. Cobb,et al.  Mathematizing and Symbolizing: The Emergence of Chains of Signification in One First-Grade Classroom , 2021, Situated Cognition.

[38]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[39]  Nico Verloop,et al.  Experienced teachers' knowledge of teaching and learning of models and modelling in science education , 2002 .

[40]  David Hestenes,et al.  A modeling method for high school physics instruction , 1995 .

[41]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[42]  John L. Rudolph,et al.  Considering the nature of scientific problems when designing science curricula , 2001 .

[43]  P. Kitcher,et al.  The advancement of science : science without legend, objectivity without illusions , 1995 .

[44]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Instructional, Curricular, and Technological Supports for Inquiry in Science Classrooms , 1998 .

[45]  Barbara A. Crawford,et al.  Supporting prospective teachers' conceptions of modelling in science , 2004 .

[46]  Model-based reasoning in a year 10 classroom , 1999 .

[47]  Paul J. Germann,et al.  Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting scientific inquiry , 1996 .

[48]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Interpreting Scientific and Engineering Practices: Integrating the cognitive, social, and cultural dimensions , 2003 .

[49]  L. Darden Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics , 1991 .

[50]  C. Hempel Philosophy of Natural Science , 1966 .

[51]  Deborah Trumbull,et al.  University researchers' inchoate critiques-of science teaching: Implications for the content of preservice science teacher education , 1993 .

[52]  Ronald N. Giere,et al.  Understanding Scientific Reasoning , 1979 .

[53]  John L. Rudolph,et al.  Portraying epistemology: School science in historical context , 2003 .

[54]  Edward K. Morris,et al.  The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America , 2002 .

[55]  E. Brody Science as Social Knowledge. Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry , 1990 .

[56]  J. J. A. Smit,et al.  Models in physics: perceptions held by final-year prospective physical science teachers studying at South African universities , 1995 .

[57]  Jim Minstrell,et al.  Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science , 2000 .

[58]  M. Gertrude Hennessey,et al.  Sixth-Grade Students' Epistemologies of Science: The Impact of School Science Experiences on Epistemological Development , 2000 .

[59]  S. Vosniadou Mental Models in Conceptual Development , 2002 .

[60]  James D. Watson,et al.  The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA , 1968 .

[61]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[62]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[63]  Andrew Izsak,et al.  Inscribing the Winch: Mechanisms by Which Students Develop Knowledge Structures for Representing the Physical World With Algebra , 2000 .

[64]  H. Kyburg,et al.  How the laws of physics lie , 1984 .

[65]  J. Greeno,et al.  Thinking Practices in Mathematics and Science Learning , 1998 .

[66]  D. Gentner,et al.  Metaphor and knowledge change , 2000 .

[67]  R. Hackett Young People's Images of Science , 1996 .

[68]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[69]  J. Bransford,et al.  How students learn : history, mathematics, and science in the classroom , 2005 .

[70]  David N. Perkins,et al.  Models and Moves: Focusing on Dimensions of Causal Complexity To Achieve Deeper Scientific Understanding. , 2000 .

[71]  J. Lagowski National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[72]  Diane F Halpern,et al.  Changing College Classrooms: New Teaching and Learning Strategies for an Increasingly Complex World , 1994 .

[73]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Innovations in learning : new environments for education , 1996 .

[74]  Magdalene Lampert,et al.  When the Problem Is Not the Question and the Solution Is Not the Answer: Mathematical Knowing and Teaching , 1990 .

[75]  Susan Carey,et al.  `An experiment is when you try it and see if it works': a study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge , 1989 .

[76]  Howard E. Gruber,et al.  Darwin on man. A psychological study of scientific creativity, together with Darwin's early and unpublished notebooks , 1975, Medical History.

[77]  D. Hubble THE AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF CHARLES DARWIN , 1958 .