Mid-term prognosis of type I Boston keratoprosthesis reimplantation

Aim To examine the mid-term visual and anatomical prognosis of patients who require reimplantation of a second Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 (B-KPro). Methods Retrospective observational case series of 122 patients (141 eyes) who received a B-KPro at a single institution were reviewed. Eyes that underwent a second B-KPro were included in the study. Primary endpoints were B-KPro retention, final visual acuity 20/200 and loss of light perception. Secondary endpoints included the occurrence of postoperative complications. Results Seventeen eyes (12%) required a B-KPro reimplantation. Corneal melt was the most common indication for replacement (88%). Mean follow-up time after the second B-KPro was 4.4±2.1 years. The Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated the second B-KPro retention rate at 79% over 8 years. Retroprosthetic membrane (RPM, 53%) was the most common complication. Forty-one per cent of the eyes suffered from corneal melt following their second B-KPro. One year after the second B-KPro, 47% of the patients retained a vision 20/200. Seven eyes (41.2%) lost light perception, which was secondary to an inoperable retinal detachment in five cases. Four eyes (24%) developed phthisis following inoperable retinal detachment (n=3) or endophthalmitis (n=1). Conclusion B-KPro reimplantation is a potentially sight- and globe-saving procedure for eyes with B-KPro failure, but the prognosis is guarded. B-KPro reimplantation can salvage ambulatory vision in a third of patients while another third of patients progress to loss of light perception. RPM and retinal detachment were important obstacles to visual rehabilitation while recurrent corneal melt was responsible for most cases of anatomical failure.

[1]  A. Szigiato,et al.  Long-term visual outcomes of the Boston type I keratoprosthesis in Canada , 2020, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[2]  A. Bardan,et al.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Medium- and Long-Term Outcomes of the Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis. , 2019, Cornea.

[3]  I. Schwab,et al.  Posterior Segment Complications and Impact on Long-Term Visual Outcomes in Eyes With a Type 1 Boston Keratoprosthesis. , 2019, Cornea.

[4]  C. Cursiefen,et al.  [Boston type I keratoprosthesis implantation technique : Video article]. , 2019, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[5]  M. Harissi-Dagher,et al.  Corneal Melt after Boston Keratoprosthesis: Clinical Presentation, Management, Outcomes and Risk Factor Analysis , 2018, Ocular immunology and inflammation.

[6]  U. Stenevi,et al.  Aniridia-related keratopathy: Structural changes in naïve and transplanted corneal buttons , 2018, PloS one.

[7]  Jay C. Wang,et al.  Outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 reimplantation: multicentre study results. , 2018, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[8]  F. Yu,et al.  Long-Term Visual Outcomes, Complications, and Retention of the Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis , 2018, Cornea.

[9]  E. Holland,et al.  Intermediate-Term and Long-Term Outcomes With the Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis in Aniridia , 2018, Cornea.

[10]  J. Parel,et al.  Impact of Total Pars Plana Vitrectomy on Postoperative Complications in Aphakic, Snap-On, Type 1 Boston Keratoprosthesis. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[11]  M. Harissi-Dagher,et al.  No Light Perception Outcomes Following Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 Surgery. , 2017, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  J. Chodosh,et al.  The Boston keratoprosthesis , 2017, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[13]  F. Yu,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes of the Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis in the Management of Corneal Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency , 2016, Cornea.

[14]  M. Nordlund,et al.  Incidence, Risk Factors, and Surgical Management of Boston Type 1 Keratoprothesis Corneal Melts, Leaks, and Extrusions , 2016, Cornea.

[15]  S. Hannush,et al.  Outcomes of Repeat Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Implantation. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  J. Chodosh,et al.  Protective effect of soft contact lenses after Boston keratoprosthesis , 2015, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[17]  A. Lane,et al.  Retinal detachments after Boston Keratoprosthesis: incidence, predisposing factors, and visual outcomes. , 2015, Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO.

[18]  M. Harissi-Dagher,et al.  Characteristics and management of patients with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis explantation--the University of Montreal Hospital Center experience. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  Beatriz Munoz,et al.  Long-term outcomes of boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation: a retrospective multicenter cohort. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[20]  M. Harissi-Dagher,et al.  Outcomes following Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation in aniridia patients at the University of Montreal. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  F. Price,et al.  A Technique to Rescue Keratoprosthesis Melts , 2013, Cornea.

[22]  J. Chodosh,et al.  The Boston Keratoprosthesis Type I in Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid , 2013, Cornea.

[23]  Michael W. Belin,et al.  Retention of the Boston keratoprosthesis type 1: multicenter study results. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[24]  S. Kiss,et al.  Vitreoretinal surgery in the setting of permanent keratoprosthesis. , 2012, Archives of ophthalmology.

[25]  M. Harissi-Dagher,et al.  Prevalence, progression, and impact of glaucoma on vision after Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis surgery. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  F. Yu,et al.  The Boston Keratoprosthesis in the Management of Corneal Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency , 2011, Cornea.

[27]  M. Harissi-Dagher,et al.  Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: the CHUM experience. , 2011, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[28]  C. A. Utine,et al.  Crescenteric amniotic membrane grafting in keratoprosthesis-associated corneal melt. , 2010, Archives of ophthalmology.

[29]  M. Durand,et al.  Successful Prevention of Bacterial Endophthalmitis in Eyes with the Boston Keratoprosthesis , 2009, Cornea.

[30]  Claes H Dohlman,et al.  Importance of Nutrition to Corneal Grafts When Used as a Carrier of the Boston Keratoprosthesis , 2007, Cornea.

[31]  M. Belin,et al.  Results from the multicenter Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[32]  M. Doane,et al.  Keratoprosthesis: Preoperative Prognostic Categories , 2001, Cornea.

[33]  P. Spring Importance of nutrition. , 1973, Journal of the American Dental Association.