Learning curve of MRI-based planning for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE To evaluate introduction of MRI-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT), including procedure times, dose-volume parameters, and perioperative morbidity. METHODS AND MATERIALS Study included 42 high-risk prostate cancer patients enrolled in a clinical protocol, offering external beam radiotherapy + two HDRBT 8.5 Gy boosts. Time was recorded for initiation of anesthesia (A), fixation of needle implant (B), end of MR imaging (C), plan approval (D), and end of HDRBT delivery (E). We defined time A-E as total procedure time, A-B as operating room time, B-C as MRI procedure time, C-D as treatment planning time, and D to E as treatment delivery time. Dose-volume parameters were retrieved from the dose planning system. Results from the first 21 patients were compared with the last 21 patients. RESULTS Total procedure time, operating room time, MRI procedure time, and treatment planning time decreased significantly from average 7.6 to 5.3 hours (p < 0.01), 3.6 to 2.4 hours (p < 0.01), 1.6 to 0.8 hours (p < 0.01), and 2.0 to 1.3 hours (p < 0.01), respectively. HDRBT delivery time remained unchanged at 0.5 hours. Clinical target volume prostate+3mmD90 fulfilled planning aim in 92% of procedures and increased significantly from average 8.3 to 9.0 Gy (p < 0.01). Urethral D0.1 cm(3) and rectal D2 cm(3) fulfilled planning aim in 78% and 95% of procedures, respectively, and did not change significantly. Hematuria occurred in (95%), hematoma (80%), moderate to strong pain (35%), and urinary retention (5%) of procedures. CONCLUSIONS After introduction of MRI-based HDRBT, procedure times were significantly reduced. D90 Clinical target volumeprostate+3mm fulfilled constraints in most patients and improved over time, but not at expense of an increased urethral or rectal dose.

[1]  P. Georg,et al.  Dosimetric considerations to determine the optimal technique for localized prostate cancer among external photon, proton, or carbon-ion therapy and high-dose-rate or low-dose-rate brachytherapy. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  J. Borrás,et al.  Patterns of care for brachytherapy in Europe: updated results for Spain , 2012, Clinical and Translational Oncology.

[3]  P. Manser,et al.  Late toxicity and five year outcomes after high-dose-rate brachytherapy as a monotherapy for localized prostate cancer , 2014, Radiation Oncology.

[4]  D. Ash,et al.  Outcomes following iodine-125 monotherapy for localized prostate cancer: the results of leeds 10-year single-center brachytherapy experience. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Robert E Lenkinski,et al.  Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging--initial results. , 2007, Radiology.

[6]  R. Pötter,et al.  GEC/ESTRO-EAU recommendations on temporary brachytherapy using stepping sources for localised prostate cancer. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  Y. Yoshioka,et al.  High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as a monotherapy for localized prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  J. Coebergh,et al.  A population-based study on the utilisation rate of primary radiotherapy for prostate cancer in 4 regions in the Netherlands, 1997-2008. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  A. Renshaw,et al.  Biochemical Outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam Radiation Therapy, or interstitial Radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer , 1998 .

[10]  H H Holm,et al.  Transperineal 125iodine seed implantation in prostatic cancer guided by transrectal ultrasonography. 1983. , 1983, The Journal of urology.

[11]  W. J. Morris,et al.  Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Is Superior to Dose-Escalated EBRT for Unfavourable Risk Prostate Cancer: The Results of the ASCENDE-RT* Randomized Control Trial , 2015 .

[12]  P. Hoskin,et al.  GEC/ESTRO recommendations on high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for localised prostate cancer: an update. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  P. Hoskin,et al.  Dosimetric predictors of biochemical control of prostate cancer in patients randomised to external beam radiotherapy with a boost of high dose rate brachytherapy. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  T. Mate,et al.  High dose-rate afterloading 192Iridium prostate brachytherapy: feasibility report. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Adam P Dicker,et al.  Comparative analysis of prostate‐specific antigen free survival outcomes for patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treatment by radical therapy. Results from the Prostate Cancer Results Study Group , 2012, BJU international.

[16]  P. Hoskin,et al.  Randomised trial of external beam radiotherapy alone or combined with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for localised prostate cancer. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  The influence of a rectal ultrasound probe on the separation between prostate and rectum in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. , 2015, Brachytherapy.

[18]  T. Pugh,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based treatment planning for prostate brachytherapy. , 2013, Brachytherapy.

[19]  Peter Dunscombe,et al.  Bypassing the learning curve in permanent seed implants using state-of-the-art technology. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  D. Baltas,et al.  A conformal index (COIN) to evaluate implant quality and dose specification in brachytherapy. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Deidre Batchelar,et al.  Validation study of ultrasound-based high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy planning compared with CT-based planning. , 2014, Brachytherapy.

[22]  C. Kirisits,et al.  Magnetic resonance image guided brachytherapy. , 2014, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[23]  L. Schour,et al.  High-dose-rate intensity-modulated brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: California endocurietherapy's 10-year results. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  P. Hoskin,et al.  High dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for prostate cancer: catheter and gland movement between fractions. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  J. Blasko,et al.  Fifteen-year biochemical relapse-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival following I(125) prostate brachytherapy in clinically localized prostate cancer: Seattle experience. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  C. N. Coleman,et al.  MRI-guided HDR prostate brachytherapy in standard 1.5T scanner. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  B. Donnelly,et al.  Estrogen receptor in human benign prostatic hyperplasia. , 1983, The Journal of urology.

[28]  Y. Yamada,et al.  Comparison of PSA relapse-free survival in patients treated with ultra-high-dose IMRT versus combination HDR brachytherapy and IMRT. , 2008, Brachytherapy.

[29]  P. Hoskin,et al.  High-dose-rate brachytherapy alone for localized prostate cancer in patients at moderate or high risk of biochemical recurrence. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.