Perceptual-motor function of school-age children with slow handwriting speed.

OBJECTIVES This study investigated differences in perceptual-motor measures and sustained attention between children with slow and normal handwriting speed and the relationship between these factors. METHOD Thirty-four slow handwriters and 35 normal speed handwriters (7 to 11 years of age) attending elementary schools in Taiwan were given three perceptual-motor tests and a vigilance task to assess sustained attention. Performances on these measures were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance and regression analyses. RESULTS A significant difference was found between slow and normal handwriters in upper-limb coordination, visual memory, spatial relation, form constancy, visual sequential memory, figure ground, visual-motor integration, and sustained attention. The three significant predictors of handwriting speed for the slow handwriters were age, visual sequential memory, and visual-motor integration. For the normal speed handwriters, age and upper-limb speed and dexterity were the only two significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS Slow and normal speed handwriters responded to handwriting demands through different perceptual-motor systems. Whereas upper-limb speed and dexterity seems to play an important role in normal speed handwriters, slow handwriters seem to rely more on visually directed processes, including sequence memory and visual-motor integration.

[1]  J. Lindsey,et al.  Handwriting and the Classroom Experience: A Recapitulation , 1984 .

[2]  L. Meltzer,et al.  Developmental output failure: a study of low productivity in school-aged children. , 1981, Pediatrics.

[3]  C E Oliver,et al.  A sensorimotor program for improving writing readiness skills in elementary-age children. , 1990, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[4]  Jane Taylor,et al.  Handwriting: Theory, Research and Practice , 1987 .

[5]  J. Ziviani,et al.  Handwriting: A Perceptual-Motor Disturbance in Children with Myelomeningocele , 1990 .

[6]  篠川裕子,et al.  Test of Visual Perceptual Skills (TVPS) 新しい視知覚評価 , 1989 .

[7]  Motor development in early and later childhood: longitudinal approaches: Development of children's writing performance: some educational implications , 1993 .

[8]  I. Hsueh,et al.  Performance of school-aged children on a Chinese handwriting speed test , 1997 .

[9]  M. Martlew.  Handwriting and spelling: dyslexic children's abilities compared with children of the same chronological age and younger children of the same spelling level. , 1992, The British journal of educational psychology.

[10]  N. Rubin,et al.  Two sides of the same coin: variations in teaching methods and failure to learn to write. , 2007, Special education: forward trends.

[11]  Keith E. Beery,et al.  VIM (The) : developmental test of visual-motor integration : administration, scoring, and teaching manual , 1989 .

[12]  Nils Søvik.  Developmental cybernetics of handwriting and graphic behavior : an experimental system analysis of writing readiness and instruction , 1975 .

[13]  A. W. Blöte,et al.  Development of Handwriting in Primary School: A Longitudinal Study , 1990, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  A. W. Blöte,et al.  A Longitudinal Study on Dysgraphic Handwriting in Primary School , 1993, Journal of learning disabilities.

[15]  Mei Hui Tseng,et al.  Differences in Perceptual-Motor Measures in Children with Good and Poor Handwriting , 1994 .

[16]  A F Maeland,et al.  Handwriting and Perceptual-Motor Skills in Clumsy, Dysgraphic, and ‘Normal’ Children , 1992, Perceptual and motor skills.

[17]  Motor development in early and later childhood: longitudinal approaches: Handwriting: a developmental perspective , 1993 .

[18]  J. Cunningham,et al.  Effect of pencil diameter on the graphomotor skill of preschoolers , 1990 .

[19]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Movement Analysis of Repetitive Writing Behaviour of First, Second and Third Grade Primary School Children , 1986 .

[20]  S. Cermak,et al.  Fine motor activities in elementary school: preliminary findings and provisional implications for children with fine motor problems. , 1992, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[21]  S. Chen,et al.  Processing Chinese Logographs by Chinese Brain Damaged Patients , 1986 .

[22]  J. Case-Smith,et al.  Factors that relate to good and poor handwriting. , 1996, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[23]  R. Dixon,et al.  Handwriting performance in younger and older adults: age, familiarity, and practice effects. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[24]  Aileen B. Sedman,et al.  A longitudinal study , 1987 .

[25]  Robert H. Bruininks,et al.  Bruininks - Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency , 1978 .

[26]  V. Berninger,et al.  RELATIONSHIP OF FINGER FUNCTION TO BEGINNING WRITING: APPLICATION TO DIAGNOSIS OF WRITING DISABILITIES , 1992, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[27]  S J Amundson,et al.  Relationship between visuomotor and handwriting skills of children in kindergarten. , 1994, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[28]  J. Ziviani,et al.  An Evaluation of Handwriting Performance , 1984 .

[29]  Joanne F. Carlisle,et al.  A study of handwriting in written stories of normal and learning disabled children , 1996 .