A Practical Study on the Design of a User-Interface Robot Application

People are striving for easy, natural interfaces. Robotic user interfaces aim at providing this kind of interface by using human like interaction modalities. However, many applications fail, not because of fundamental problems of addressing social interaction but due to an unbalanced design. In this paper we derive a balancing framework for designing robotic user interfaces that balances four key dimensions: user, application, interface and technology. We investigate applicability of the the framework by means of two experiments. The first experiment demonstrates that violations to the balancing framework can negate the efforts to improve an interface with natural interaction modalities. In the second experiment we present a real world application that adheres to the balancing concepts. Our results show that a balanced design is a key factor for the success or failure of a given robotic interface.

[1]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  The Art of Designing Socially Intelligent Agents: Science, Fiction, and the Human in the Loop , 1998, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[2]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Mortality salience and the uncanny valley , 2005, 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2005..

[3]  Joseph Bates,et al.  The role of emotion in believable agents , 1994, CACM.

[4]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[5]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Universal usability , 2000, Commun. ACM.

[6]  P. Maes.  How to Do the Right Thing , 1989 .

[7]  Sebastian Lang,et al.  Research Issues for Designing Robot Companions: BIRON as a Case Study , 2004 .

[8]  Klaus Dorer.  The magmaFreiburg Soccer Team , 1999, RoboCup.

[9]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[10]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perception of Animacy from the Motion of a Single Object , 2000, Perception.

[11]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[12]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[13]  Amandine Grizard,et al.  Generation of facial emotional expressions based on Scherer psychological theory , 2006 .

[14]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[15]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Design spaces and niche spaces of believable social robots , 2002, Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.