Predictive parameters of left ventricular reverse remodeling in response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with severe congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is useful for the treatment of severe congestive heart failure. Unfortunately up to 30% of patients could be non-responders. The aim of our study was to find parameters to predict responsiveness to CRT. METHODS Fifteen patients (9 males, 6 females, mean age 67.3 +/- 7.8 years, range 52-83 years) with dilated cardiomyopathy, NYHA functional class III-IV, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction < 35% and QRS > or = 110 ms, underwent CRT. All the patients had echocardiographic evidence of systolic dys-synchrony. RESULTS One patient died of electromechanical dissociation. The remaining 14 patients maintained biventricular stimulation at 6 months; mean QRS width decreased from 156 to 132 ms (p < 0.001). Ten patients (71%) were considered responders because of a reduction in LV end-systolic volume > 15%. In non-responders (4 patients, 29%) LV end-systolic volume was stable in 3 patients and increased in 1. LV ejection fraction significantly increased only in responders (p < 0.001). Responders had more severe pre-pacing dyssynchrony than non-responders (p < 0.001). Inter- (p = 0.002) and intraventricular dyssynchrony (p = 0.003) did significantly reduce after CRT only in responders. On multiple regression analysis there were two independent predictors of reverse remodeling after pacing: the baseline mitral QS-tricuspid QS (QSm-QSt) time (B = -1.7, p = 0.005) and the intraventricular dyssynchrony index (B = -1.55, p = 0.007). Pre-implant QSm-QSt of 38 ms correctly identified the two groups: responders had a value > 38 ms and non-responders < 38 ms. The pre-implant intraventricular dyssynchrony index of 28 ms was the cut-off value: responders had an index > 28 ms, non-responders < 28 ms. CONCLUSIONS In the literature a tissue Doppler imaging index of intraventricular dyssynchrony evaluated before implantation is used to select responders to CRT. In our work we studied interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony, and both the QSm-QSt time and the standard deviation of the 12 LV segment QS time were correctly able to identify responders.

[1]  S. Kong,et al.  Comparison of Efficacy of Reverse Remodeling and Clinical Improvement for Relatively Narrow and Wide QRS Complexes After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure , 2004, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[2]  R. Koerfer,et al.  Predictive value of tissue doppler echocardiographic findings on positive left ventricular remodeling induced by cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2003 .

[3]  Chu-Pak Lau,et al.  Predictors of left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  J. Sanderson,et al.  Fragile left atrial thrombus successfully treated with anticoagulants , 2003, Heart.

[5]  J. Blanc,et al.  Long-term left ventricular pacing: assessment and comparison with biventricular pacing in patients with severe congestive heart failure. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  J. Blanc,et al.  Evaluation of left ventricular function and mitral regurgitation during left ventricular‐based pacing in patients with heart failure , 2001, European journal of heart failure.

[7]  J. Daubert,et al.  Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Arma,et al.  EFFECTS OF MULTISITE BIVENTRICULAR PACING IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE AND INTRAVENTRICULAR CONDUCTION DELAY , 2001 .

[9]  A. Feldman,et al.  Heart failure management using implantable devices for ventricular resynchronization: Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Chronic Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial. COMPANION Steering Committee and COMPANION Clinical Investigators. , 2000, Journal of cardiac failure.

[10]  J. Spinelli,et al.  Cardiac pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: impact of pacing site for optimizing left ventricular resynchronization. , 2000, Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[11]  J. Spinelli,et al.  Is resynchronization between left and right ventricles responsible for improving hemodynamic function of heart failure patients with LBBB , 2000 .

[12]  J. Daubert,et al.  Electrocardiographic predictive factors of long-term clinical improvement with multisite biventricular pacing in advanced heart failure. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  J. Spinelli,et al.  Pacing for heart failure: selection of patients, techniques and benefits , 1999, European journal of heart failure.

[14]  Andrew P. Kramer,et al.  Effect of pacing chamber and atrioventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure. The Pacing Therapies for Congestive Heart Failure Study Group. The Guidant Congestive Heart Failure Research Group. , 1999, Circulation.