Impact of Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock on Drug Response

Several studies conducted in critically ill patients have demonstrated that inappropriate antibiotic treatment was associated with increased mortality (Niederman, 2006; Pea & Viale, 2009; Zilberberg et al., 2008). This fact was always related to the use of the wrong antimicrobial agent. However, the failure of a treatment might be due to inadequate doses that lead to sub-therapeutic concentrations at the infection site. This last issue is relevant in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock as many factors can influence pharmacokinetic variability and consequently human drug response. Among these factors we can mention the pathology itself. Only the knowledge of the pathogenesis of sepsis can enable us to understand the variability of drug concentrations with the aim of a successful therapeutic outcome avoiding therapeutic failure or toxicity. The sudden changes observed in severe sepsis or septic shock (increase in capillary permeability, edema formation, vasodilation and hypotension) and the therapeutic action taken to revert the situation (volume resuscitation, vasopressor agents) makes antibiotics or other drug concentrations difficult to interpret. Due to the lack of stable disease conditions, and consequently marked variations in pharmacokinetics parameters, dose dosage in these patients is a great challenge. The dynamic status of sepsis in critically ill patients results in alterations in pharmacokinetic parameters so it is of importance drug concentration assessment in this population, different from healthy volunteers or less severe ill patients. The use of nomograms to provide estimates for dosages is not advisable as they assume normal pharmacokinetic parameters and due to instability of the system, pharmacokinetic parameters are subject to rapid changes. As the measurement of total drug concentration (free drug plus protein-bound drug) is much easier and cheaper than free drug determination, therapeutic drug monitoring is usually based on total plasma concentrations. However, only the free drug is capable of diffusing into the biophase, only the free drug is responsible for the therapeutic effect. This fact has to be taken into account to see if the changes provoked by sepsis itself impact on both total drug and free drug in the same way. If this is not the case, defining dose regimens only by plasma total drug concentrations could be erroneous.

[1]  Alicia A. Grandey,et al.  From bad to worse , 2012 .

[2]  A. Scaramelli,et al.  Influence of Efflux Transporters on Drug Metabolism , 2011, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[3]  Frédérique Jacobs,et al.  Insufficient β-lactam concentrations in the early phase of severe sepsis and septic shock , 2010, Critical care.

[4]  M. Falagas,et al.  Some current issues in the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials in intensive care. , 2010, Minerva anestesiologica.

[5]  J. Vincent,et al.  Revisiting the loading dose of amikacin for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock , 2010, Critical care.

[6]  M. Roberts,et al.  Meropenem dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis and without renal dysfunction: intermittent bolus versus continuous administration? Monte Carlo dosing simulations and subcutaneous tissue distribution. , 2009, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[7]  P. Viale,et al.  Bench-to-bedside review: Appropriate antibiotic therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock – does the dose matter? , 2009, Critical care.

[8]  J. L. Iribarren,et al.  Clinical cure of ventilator-associated pneumonia treated with piperacillin/tazobactam administered by continuous or intermittent infusion. , 2009, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[9]  S. Mody,et al.  Antimicrobial therapy escalation and hospital mortality among patients with health-care-associated pneumonia: a single-center experience. , 2008, Chest.

[10]  A. Brink,et al.  Recommendations to achieve rapid therapeutic teicoplanin plasma concentrations in adult hospitalised patients treated for sepsis. , 2008, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[11]  M. Gerónimo-Pardo,et al.  Glomerular Hyperfiltration and Albuminuria in Critically ILL Patients , 2008, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[12]  C. Scavone,et al.  Therapeutic carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproic acid (VPA) monitoring in children using saliva as a biologic fluid , 2008 .

[13]  V. Cardile,et al.  Induction of nuclear receptors and drug resistance in the brain microvascular endothelial cells treated with antiepileptic drugs. , 2008, Current neurovascular research.

[14]  A. Boronat,et al.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin in severe sepsis and septic shock. , 2008, International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[15]  C. Kloft,et al.  Effect of severity of sepsis on tissue concentrations of linezolid. , 2007, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[16]  M. Niederman,et al.  Use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials for the treatment of pneumonia in seriously ill patients: maximizing clinical outcomes and minimizing selection of resistant organisms. , 2006, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[17]  G. Drusano,et al.  Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Extending the Administration Time of Meropenem using a Monte Carlo Simulation , 2005, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[18]  F. Sörgel,et al.  Concentrations in Plasma, Urinary Excretion, and Bactericidal Activity of Linezolid (600 Milligrams) versus Those of Ciprofloxacin (500 Milligrams) in Healthy Volunteers Receiving a Single Oral Dose , 2003, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[19]  M. Fromm,et al.  Differential expression and function of CYP2C isoforms in human intestine and liver. , 2003, Pharmacogenetics.

[20]  R. Bucala,et al.  Therapeutic approaches to innate immunity: severe sepsis and septic shock , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[21]  W. Löscher,et al.  Multidrug Resistance Protein MRP2 Contributes to Blood-Brain Barrier Function and Restricts Antiepileptic Drug Activity , 2003, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[22]  D. Deleu,et al.  Salivary free concentrations of anti-epileptic drugs: an evaluation in a routine clinical setting. , 2003, Acta neurologica Belgica.

[23]  P. Tulkens,et al.  Comparative Stability Studies of Antipseudomonal β-Lactams for Potential Administration through Portable Elastomeric Pumps (Home Therapy for Cystic Fibrosis Patients) and Motor-Operated Syringes (Intensive Care Units) , 2002, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[24]  M. Sperling,et al.  Interpatient and Intrapatient Variability in Phenytoin Protein Binding , 2002, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[25]  K. Walley,et al.  Physiology of vasopressin relevant to management of septic shock. , 2001, Chest.

[26]  M. G. Johnson,et al.  Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of linezolid following an oral dose of [(14)C]linezolid to healthy human subjects. , 2001, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[27]  Martin Brunner,et al.  Impaired target site penetration of &bgr; -lactams may account for therapeutic failure in patients with septic shock , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[28]  C. Dinarello,et al.  Proinflammatory cytokines. , 2000, Chest.

[29]  C. Rickard,et al.  Low Plasma Cefepime Levels in Critically Ill Septic Patients: Pharmacokinetic Modeling Indicates Improved Troughs with Revised Dosing , 1999, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[30]  R. Bone,et al.  Sir Isaac Newton, sepsis, SIRS, and CARS. , 1996, Critical care medicine.

[31]  J. A. Kruse,et al.  Continuous infusion versus intermittent administration of ceftazidime in critically ill patients with suspected gram-negative infections , 1996, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[32]  D. Levine,et al.  Comparison of conventional dosing versus continuous-infusion vancomycin therapy for patients with suspected or documented gram-positive infections , 1996, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[33]  R. Levy Cytochrome P450 Isozymes and Antiepileptic Drug Interactions , 1995, Epilepsia.

[34]  I. Whyte,et al.  Altered Aminoglycoside Pharmacokinetics in the Critically Ill , 1988, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[35]  A. Glazko,et al.  Diphenylhydantoin metabolism in uremia. , 1971, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  Cecilia Maldonado,et al.  Time-dependent and concentration -dependent upregulation of carbamazepine efflux transporter: a preliminary assessment from salivary drug monitoring , 2011 .

[37]  M. Vázquez,et al.  Total, Unbound Plasma and Salivary Phenytoin Levels in Critically Ill Patients , 2010 .

[38]  W. Buylaert,et al.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations When Treating Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock , 2002, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[39]  D. Cook,et al.  Crystalloids vs. colloids in fluid resuscitation: a systematic review. , 1999, Critical care medicine.