Qualitative study of nanocluster positioning process: Planar molecular dynamics simulations

Abstract One of the key factors in the assembly of nanoclusters is the precise positioning of them by a manipulation system. Currently the size of clusters used as building blocks is shrinking down to a few nanometers. In such cases, the particle nature of matter plays an important role in the manipulator/cluster/substrate interactions. Having a deeper insight to the aforementioned nano-scale interactions is crucial for prediction and understanding of the behavior of nanoclusters during the positioning process. In the present research, 2D molecular dynamics simulations have been used to investigate such behaviors. Performing planar simulations can provide a fairly acceptable qualitative tool for our purpose while the computation time is greatly reduced in comparison to 3D simulations. The system consists of a tip, cluster and substrate. The focus of the present research is on ultra-fine metallic nanoclusters. To perform this research, Nose–Hoover dynamics and Sutton–Chen interatomic potential will be used to investigate the behavior of the above system which is made from different transition metals. The effects of material type, tip form and manipulation strategy on the success of the process have been investigated by planar molecular dynamics. Such qualitative simulation studies can evaluate the chance of success of a certain nanopositioning scenario regarding different working conditions before consuming large-scale computation time or high experimental expenses.

[1]  Hideki Hashimoto,et al.  Scaled teleoperation system for nano-scale interaction and manipulation , 2003, Adv. Robotics.

[2]  Jonathan Doye,et al.  Global minima for transition metal clusters described by Sutton–Chen potentials , 1997 .

[3]  Uzi Landman,et al.  Atomistic Mechanisms and Dynamics of Adhesion, Nanoindentation, and Fracture , 1990, Science.

[4]  Billy D. Todd,et al.  Surface and bulk properties of metals modelled with Sutton-Chen potentials , 1993 .

[5]  David J. Quesnel,et al.  Molecular Dynamic Simulation of Adhesional Release of Particles from Surfaces , 1998 .

[6]  M. Sitti.  Atomic force microscope probe based controlled pushing for nanotribological characterization , 2004, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[7]  M. Robbins,et al.  Critical Velocity of Stick-Slip Motion , 1991, Science.

[8]  Ning Xi,et al.  Modeling and Control of Active End Effector for the AFM Based Nano Robotic Manipulators , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Phaedon Avouris,et al.  Deformation of carbon nanotubes by surface van der Waals forces , 1998 .

[10]  M. Sitti,et al.  Dynamic modes of nanoparticle motion during nanoprobe-based manipulation , 2004, 4th IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology, 2004..

[11]  Aristides A. G. Requicha,et al.  Drift compensation for automatic nanomanipulation with scanning probe microscopes , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[12]  S. Jay Chey,et al.  Interface bonding and manipulation of Ag and Cu nanocrystals on Si(111)-(7×7)-based surfaces , 1999 .

[13]  Qinmin Yang,et al.  Nanomanipulation using atomic force microscope with drift compensation , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[14]  Hashem Rafii-Tabar,et al.  Long-range Finnis-Sinclair potentials for f.c.c. metallic alloys , 1991 .

[15]  David J. Quesnel,et al.  Molecular dynamic modeling of particle adhesion , 1995 .

[16]  Abraham Nitzan,et al.  Dynamics of tip-substrate interactions in atomic force microscopy☆ , 1989 .

[17]  U. Landman,et al.  Nanotribology: friction, wear and lubrication at the atomic scale , 1995, Nature.

[18]  Robert W. Stark,et al.  Nanomanipulation by Atomic Force Microscopy , 2005 .

[19]  Masoud K. Darabi,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of crack propagation in fcc materials containing clusters of impurities , 2006 .

[20]  Abraham Nitzan,et al.  Surface science lettersDynamics of tip-substrate interactions in atomic force microscopy☆ , 1989 .

[21]  A. Sutton,et al.  Long-range Finnis–Sinclair potentials , 1990 .

[22]  Ali Meghdari,et al.  Modal Analysis of Metallic Nanocantilevers With FCC Lattice Using Atomic Approximation Method , 2006 .

[23]  Hoover,et al.  Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[24]  Dongsik Kim,et al.  Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation on the collision of a nano-sized particle onto another nano-sized particle adhered on a flat substrate , 2005 .

[25]  Kiyoshi Kanisawa,et al.  Manipulation and adsorption-site mapping of single pentacene molecules on Cu(111) , 2004 .

[26]  Kai-Felix Braun,et al.  Single-Atom Extraction by Scanning Tunneling Microscope Tip Crash and Nanoscale Surface Engineering , 2004 .

[27]  B. V. Derjaguin,et al.  Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles , 1975 .

[28]  Bernhard Wassermann,et al.  Controlled low-temperature molecular manipulation of sexiphenyl molecules on Ag111 using scanning tunneling microscopy. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[29]  Hashem Rafii-Tabar,et al.  Modelling the nano-scale phenomena in condensed matter physics via computer-based numerical simulations , 2000 .

[30]  M. Robbins,et al.  Origin of Stick-Slip Motion in Boundary Lubrication , 1990, Science.

[31]  S. Nosé.  A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods , 1984 .

[32]  Landman,et al.  Stability and collapse of metallic structures on surfaces. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[33]  K. Kendall,et al.  Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[34]  Saroj K. Nayak,et al.  Thermodynamics of small nickel clusters , 1998 .

[35]  H. Hashimoto,et al.  Controlled pushing of nanoparticles: modeling and experiments , 2000 .

[36]  Stephane Regnier,et al.  Simulation of micro-manipulations: Adhesion forces and specific dynamic models , 1999 .