This paper analyzes the role of the housing finance during the 2000s housing boombust in the U.S. using a quantitative macroeconomic model with housing market search frictions and long-term mortgages with default option. In the model, the housing boom is fueled by easy credit conditions in the mortgage market that generate sizable increases in homeownership, refinancing activity, but modest effects on aggregate consumption. While the form of housing finance (adjustable rate vs. fixed rate mortgages) is not very important during the housing boom, it matters for the speed of the recovery. When borrowers use ARMs, their consumption during bust periods is more sensitive to changes in the interest rate. The model also rationalizes the asymmetric behavior of consumption—namely, that it is more sensitive to house price declines than increases.
[1]
Carlos Garriga,et al.
Mortgage Debt, Consumption, and Illiquid Housing Markets in the Great Recession
,
2017,
American Economic Review.
[2]
Paul Sullivan,et al.
The equilibrium effect of fundamentals on house prices and rents
,
2013
.
[3]
Kyle F. Herkenhoff,et al.
Foreclosure Delay and U.S. Unemployment
,
2012
.
[4]
that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. The Macroeconomic Effects of Housing Wealth, Housing Finance, and Limited Risk-Sharing in General Equilibrium
,
2010
.
[5]
Morris A. Davis,et al.
The Rent-Price Ratio for the Aggregate Stock of Owner-Occupied Housing
,
2008
.
[6]
Anthony Pennington-Cross,et al.
The Value of Foreclosed Property
,
2004
.
[7]
Chris I. Telmer,et al.
Cyclical Dynamics in Idiosyncratic Labor Market Risk
,
2004,
Journal of Political Economy.