Qualitative Longitudinal Research: From Monochrome to Technicolour

Qualitative longitudinal research (QLR) has grown in prominence and popularity since the 2007 themed section on the subject in this journal. This new themed section reflects on how QLR has been mobilised and made sense of in recent times. This article showcases QLR’s distinctive way of knowing and understanding the social world and how it can illuminate the processes through which policy can enhance, or indeed inhibit, the well-being of individuals and groups within society. This state of the art article focuses on QLR as a valuable but tricky approach. It argues that QLR can enhance qualitative research in social policy by fostering sustained policy engagement and development, and that this is especially useful for policy-making in relation to socioeconomic disadvantage. It also explores cross-cutting methodological dimensions pertinent to QLR’s distinct approach, such as its enhanced ethical considerations, which are also integral to research with people at high risk of socioeconomic disadvantage. The article concludes with possible future directions and developments for QLR as a methodology.

[1]  E. Davidson,et al.  Charting the Rough Journey to ‘Home’: The Contribution of Qualitative Longitudinal Research to Understandings of Homelessness in Austerity , 2021, Social Policy and Society.

[2]  Philip A. Martin,et al.  Military Veterans and Welfare Reform: Bridging Two Policy Worlds through Qualitative Longitudinal Research , 2021, Social Policy and Society.

[3]  G. Calder.  Child Poverty: Aspiring to Survive , 2021 .

[4]  S. Katikireddi,et al.  Using candidacy theory to explore unemployed over-50s perceptions of suitability of a welfare to work programme: A longitudinal qualitative study , 2020, Social policy & administration.

[5]  State of the Art Qualitative Longitudinal Research: From Monochrome to Technicolour , 2021 .

[6]  L. Bernardi,et al.  Relative time and life course research , 2021, Longitudinal and Life Course Studies.

[7]  Peter Dwyer,et al.  Little and large: methodological reflections from two qualitative longitudinal policy studies on welfare conditionality , 2020 .

[8]  L. Bernardi,et al.  Introduction to the special issue: Prospective qualitative research: new directions, opportunities and challenges , 2020 .

[9]  S. Vogl,et al.  Interviewing adolescents through time: balancing continuity and flexibility in a qualitative longitudinal study , 2020 .

[10]  Ruth Patrick,et al.  Conceptualising dignity in the context of social security: Bottom‐up and top‐down perspectives , 2020, Social Policy & Administration.

[11]  S. Wright,et al.  Welfare Conditionality in Lived Experience: Aggregating Qualitative Longitudinal Research , 2019, Social Policy and Society.

[12]  Welfare conditionality , 2019, Housing Studies.

[13]  B. Neale.  What Is Qualitative Longitudinal Research , 2018 .

[14]  Morag Treanor.  Falling Through the Cracks: The Cost of the School Day for Families Living in In-work and Out-of-work Poverty , 2018, Scottish Affairs.

[15]  A. Barford,et al.  The depths of the cuts: the uneven geography of local government austerity , 2018, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society.

[16]  C. Lindsay,et al.  Co-production and social innovation in street-level employability services: Lessons from services with lone parents in Scotland , 2018, International Social Security Review.

[17]  Jo Ingold,et al.  Policy Practitioners’ Accounts of Evidence-Based Policy Making: The Case of Universal Credit , 2018, Journal of Social Policy.

[18]  K. Farnsworth,et al.  Austerity: Neoliberal dreams come true? , 2018 .

[19]  A. Tarrant.  Getting out of the swamp? Methodological reflections on using qualitative secondary analysis to develop research design , 2017 .

[20]  R. Dean.  All Our Welfare: Towards Participatory Social Policy , 2017 .

[21]  Ruth Patrick.  For Whose Benefit?: The Everyday Realities of Welfare Reform , 2017 .

[22]  Daniel Edmiston.  Welfare, Austerity and Social Citizenship in the UK , 2016, Social Policy and Society.

[23]  P. Beresford.  All Our Welfare: Towards Participatory Social Policy , 2016 .

[24]  Joseph C. Hermanowicz.  Longitudinal Qualitative Research , 2016 .

[25]  S. Murray,et al.  Methodological developments in qualitative longitudinal research: the advantages and challenges of regular telephone contact with participants in a qualitative longitudinal interview study , 2015, BMC Research Notes.

[26]  T. Miller.  Going back: ‘Stalking’, talking and researcher responsibilities in qualitative longitudinal research , 2015 .

[27]  J. McLeod,et al.  New frontiers in qualitative longitudinal research: an agenda for research , 2015 .

[28]  Elizabeth Dowler,et al.  How Can Households Eat in austerity? Challenges for Social Policy in the UK , 2015, Social Policy and Society.

[29]  B. Bytheway,et al.  Grandparenting Across the Life Course , 2014 .

[30]  N. Emmel,et al.  Vulnerability, Intergenerational Exchange and the Conscience of Generations , 2014 .

[31]  B. Neale.  Adding Time into the Mix: Stakeholder Ethics in Qualitative Longitudinal Research , 2013 .

[32]  S. Fothergill,et al.  Hitting the poorest places hardest : the local and regional impact of welfare reform , 2013 .

[33]  A. Molassiotis,et al.  Developing longitudinal qualitative designs: lessons learned and recommendations for health services research , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[34]  F. Shirani,et al.  Researching the temporal. , 2012 .

[35]  E. Hanna.  THE ETHICS oF RESEaRCHINg LIvES QuaLITaTIvELy THRougH TIME Timescapes methods guide series 2012 , 2012 .

[36]  J. Warin.  Ethical Mindfulness and Reflexivity , 2011 .

[37]  J. Holland,et al.  GAINING PERSPECTIVE ON CHOICE AND FATE , 2009 .

[38]  Jane Millar,et al.  Qualitative Longitudinal Research for Social Policy – Introduction to Themed Section , 2007, Social Policy and Society.

[39]  Jane Millar,et al.  Time and Change: A Review of the Qualitative Longitudinal Research Literature for Social Policy , 2007, Social Policy and Society.