Advanced REACH Tool (ART): calibration of the mechanistic model.

The mechanistic model of the Advanced Reach Tool (ART) provides a relative ranking of exposure levels from different scenarios. The objectives of the calibration described in this paper are threefold: to study whether the mechanistic model scores are accurately ranked in relation to exposure measurements; to enable the mechanistic model to estimate actual exposure levels rather than relative scores; and to provide a method of quantifying model uncertainty. Stringent data quality guidelines were applied to the collated data. Linear mixed effects models were used to evaluate the association between relative ART model scores and measurements. A random scenario and company component of variance were introduced to reflect the model uncertainty. Stratified analyses were conducted for different forms of exposure (abrasive dust, dust, vapours and mists). In total more than 2000 good quality measurements were available for the calibration of the mechanistic model. The calibration showed that after calibration the mechanistic model of ART was able to estimate geometric mean (GM) exposure levels with 90% confidence for a given scenario to lie within a factor between two and six of the measured GM depending upon the form of exposure.

[1]  William A. Heitbrink,et al.  A Comparison of Conventional and High Volume-Low Pressure Spray-Painting Guns , 1996 .

[2]  Trevor Ogden Data sharing, Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and the lions in the undergrowth. , 2009, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[3]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Tools for regulatory assessment of occupational exposure: development and challenges , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[4]  R C Spear,et al.  Environmental versus analytical variability in exposure measurements. , 1991, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[5]  Erik Olsen,et al.  European Proposal for Core Information for the Storage and Exchange of Workplace Exposure Measurements on Chemical Agents , 1997 .

[6]  E. Symanski,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of within- and between-worker components of occupational exposure to chemical agents. , 1993, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[7]  M Tischer,et al.  Evaluation of the HSE COSHH Essentials exposure predictive model on the basis of BAuA field studies and existing substances exposure data. , 2003, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[8]  L. G. Norman,et al.  Summing Up of the Conference , 1962 .

[9]  E. Browning The Metabolic Significance of Some Toxic Solvents , 1961 .

[10]  John W Cherrie,et al.  The validity of the EASE expert system for inhalation exposures. , 2005, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[11]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Trends in inhalation exposure--a review of the data in the published scientific literature. , 2007, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[12]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Long-term trends in occupational exposure: Are they real? What causes them? What shall we do with them? , 2000, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[13]  N. M. Potter,et al.  Health and Environmental Conditions in the Iron Foundry , 1945 .

[14]  Mikael Skrifvars,et al.  The effect of spraying and rolling process factors on styrene emission during the application of unsaturated polyester resins. , 2002, AIHA journal : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[15]  K. Straif,et al.  Field comparison of inhalable aerosol samplers applied in the european rubber manufacturing industry , 2006, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[16]  S Bredendiek-Kämper,et al.  Do EASE scenarios fit workplace reality? A validation study of the EASE model. Estimation and Assessment of Substance Exposure. , 2001, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[17]  Erik Tielemans,et al.  'Stoffenmanager', a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[18]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Conceptual model for assessment of inhalation exposure: defining modifying factors. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[19]  R. Vermeulen,et al.  Trends in exposure to inhalable particulate and dermal contamination in the rubber manufacturing industry: effectiveness of control measures implemented over a nine-year period. , 2000, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[20]  H. Marquart,et al.  A proposal for evaluation of exposure data. , 2002, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[21]  H. Kromhout,et al.  Trends in Occupational Exposure to Styrene in the European Glass Fibre-Reinforced Plastics Industry , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[22]  Inge Mangelsdorf,et al.  Inhalational and dermal exposures during spray application of biocides. , 2005, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[23]  Michael R Flynn,et al.  Methods for estimating the transfer efficiency of a compressed air spray gun. , 2002, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[24]  Mitchell S. Wilbanks,et al.  EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR ECOTOXICOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY OF CHEMICALS , 2005 .

[25]  R. Hornung,et al.  Estimation of Average Concentration in the Presence of Nondetectable Values , 1990 .

[26]  H Kromhout,et al.  Trends in levels of inhalable dust exposure, exceedance and overexposure in the European carbon black manufacturing industry. , 2000, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[27]  J Tickner,et al.  Evaluation and further development of EASE model 2.0. , 2005, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[28]  H. Kromhout,et al.  Cross-validation and refinement of the Stoffenmanager as a first tier exposure assessment tool for REACH , 2009, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[29]  David While,et al.  Trends in wood dust inhalation exposure in the UK, 1985-2005. , 2009, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[30]  M. Jayjock,et al.  Modeling framework for human exposure assessment , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[31]  J. Cerhan,et al.  Epidemiologic Evaluation of Measurement Data in the Presence of Detection Limits , 2004, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[32]  T. Schneider,et al.  Validation of a New Method for Structured Subjective Assessment of Past Concentrations , 1999 .

[33]  Wouter Fransman,et al.  Stoffenmanager exposure model: development of a quantitative algorithm. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.