Surgical techniques in the performance of unicompartmental arthroplasties

The technical principles of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are similar to but subtly different from totalknee arthroplasty (TKA). Reestablishing the joint line of the diseased compartment and restoring the altered anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, and collateral (medial and lateral) kinematics are the goals of surgery. When proper indications exist, normal knee function is possible. Instrumentation systems plus surgical expertise must provide for accurate compartment resurfacing of the femoral condyle and tibial plateau. Technical errors of malposition (rotational, varus-valgus, flexion-extension) and gap imbalance (depth of resection) will negatively affect stability, mobility, wear, and fixation with less than satisfactory clinical outcomes. Because few UKAs are performed, even by so-called experts, more attention to detail is required. Excellent long-term results can be appreciated when patient selection, prosthetic design, and surgical technique are optimal. This section addresses the key technical aspects of UKA that will affect clinical results.

[1]  D. Heck,et al.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  L. Lidgren,et al.  Reduced failure rate in knee prosthetic surgery with improved implantation technique. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  W. A. Hodge,et al.  Unicompartmental knee replacement: a comparison of constrained and unconstrained designs. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  K. Otte,et al.  Cementless AGC revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  A. Lindstrand,et al.  Multicenter study of unicompartmental knee revision. PCA, Marmor, and St Georg compared in 3,777 cases of arthrosis. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[6]  S. Stulberg,et al.  The natural history of unicompartmental arthroplasty. An eight-year follow-up study with survivorship analysis. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  R. Grelsamer,et al.  A unicompartmental knee replacement is not "half a total knee": five major differences. , 1992, Orthopaedic review.

[8]  L Marmor,et al.  Marmor modular knee in unicompartmental disease. Minimum four-year follow-up. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  T. Thornhill,et al.  Unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty. , 1989, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[10]  L Ryd,et al.  Polyethylene wear in unicondylar knee prostheses. 106 retrieved Marmor, PCA, and St Georg tibial components compared. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[11]  J. O'Connor,et al.  Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  R. Scott,et al.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. , 2001, Instructional course lectures.

[13]  J. Knight,et al.  Early failure of the porous coated anatomic cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Aids to diagnosis and revision. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  J. Cameron,et al.  Meniscal Allograft Transplantation for Unicompartmental Arthritis of the Knee , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  M. Cohen,et al.  Meniscal-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. An 11-year clinical study. , 1991, Orthopaedic review.

[16]  Pa. Keblish The lateral approach to the valgus knee , 1991 .

[17]  G. Engh,et al.  A midvastus muscle-splitting approach for total knee arthroplasty. , 1997, Journal of Arthroplasty.

[18]  T. Thornhill,et al.  Conversion of failed modern unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  J. Insall,et al.  A five to seven-year follow-up of unicondylar arthroplasty. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  P Cartier,et al.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  A. Lindstrand,et al.  Polyethylene wear of the PCA unicompartmental knee. Prospective 5 (4-8) year study of 120 arthrosis knees. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[22]  S. Green Components of the Ilizarov system , 1990 .

[23]  P. Keblish The lateral approach to the valgus knee. Surgical technique and analysis of 53 cases with over two-year follow-up evaluation. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  G. Engh,et al.  Polyethylene wear of metal-backed tibial components in total and unicompartmental knee prostheses. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.