Quantitative structure-ion intensity relationship strategy to the prediction of absolute levels without authentic standards.

The lack of authentic standards represents a major bottleneck in the quantitative analysis of complex samples. Here we propose a quantitative structure and ionization intensity relationship (QSIIR) approach to predict the absolute levels of compounds in complex matrixes. An absolute quantitative method for simultaneous quantification of 25 organic acids was firstly developed and validated. Napierian logarithm (LN) of the relative slope rate derived from the calibration curves was applied as an indicator of the relative ionization intensity factor (RIIF) and serves as the dependent variable for building a QSIIR model via a multiple linear regression (MLR) approach. Five independent variables representing for hydrogen bond acidity, HOMO energy, the number of hydrogen bond donating group, the ratio of organic phase, and the polar solvent accessible surface area were found as the dominant contributors to the RIIF of organic acids. This QSIIR model was validated to be accurate and robust, with the correlation coefficients (R(2)), R(2) adjusted, and R(2) prediction at 0.945, 0.925, and 0.89, respectively. The deviation of accuracy between the predicted and experimental value in analyzing a real complex sample was less than 20% in most cases (15/18). Furthermore, the high adaptability of this model was validated one year later in another LC/MS system. The QSIIR approach is expected to provide better understanding of quantitative structure and ionization efficiency relationship of analogous compounds, and also to be useful in predicting the absolute levels of analogous analytes in complex mixtures.

[1]  Jianghao Sun,et al.  Detection, characterization and identification of phenolic acids in Danshen using high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[2]  K. Markides,et al.  Relating chromatographic retention and electrophoretic mobility to the ion distribution within electrosprayed droplets , 2006, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[3]  K. Héberger Quantitative structure-(chromatographic) retention relationships. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[4]  C. Enke,et al.  Relating electrospray ionization response to nonpolar character of small peptides. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  I. Leito,et al.  Towards the electrospray ionization mass spectrometry ionization efficiency scale of organic compounds. , 2008, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[6]  M. Oss,et al.  Electrospray ionization efficiency scale of organic compounds. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  D. Bylund,et al.  A generic stepwise optimization strategy for liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry methods. , 2006, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[8]  Y Vander Heyden,et al.  Review on modelling aspects in reversed-phase liquid chromatographic quantitative structure-retention relationships. , 2007, Analytica chimica acta.

[9]  Guangji Wang,et al.  Chemicalome and metabolome matching approach to elucidating biological metabolic networks of complex mixtures. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  Jinyuan Wang,et al.  Optimizing mass spectrometric detection for ion chromatographic analysis. I. Common anions and selected organic acids. , 2009, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[11]  P. Britz‐McKibbin,et al.  Virtual quantification of metabolites by capillary electrophoresis-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry: predicting ionization efficiency without chemical standards. , 2009, Analytical Chemistry.

[12]  Yan Liang,et al.  Global detection and identification of nontarget components from herbal preparations by liquid chromatography hybrid ion trap time-of-flight mass spectrometry and a strategy. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  C. Enke,et al.  Practical implications of some recent studies in electrospray ionization fundamentals. , 2001, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[14]  Brandie M. Ehrmann,et al.  Relative importance of basicity in the gas phase and in solution for determining selectivity in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry , 2008, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[15]  C. Enke,et al.  Predicting electrospray response from chromatographic retention time. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  Guangji Wang,et al.  Diagnostic fragment-ion-based extension strategy for rapid screening and identification of serial components of homologous families contained in traditional Chinese medicine prescription using high-resolution LC-ESI- IT-TOF/MS: Shengmai injection as an example. , 2009, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[17]  P. Chaimbault,et al.  Analysis of native amino acids by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: comparative study between two sources and interfaces. , 2008, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[18]  Jun Yang,et al.  Quantitative profiling method for oxylipin metabolome by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  M. Arooj,et al.  Computational Studies of Novel Chymase Inhibitors Against Cardiovascular and Allergic Diseases: Mechanism and Inhibition , 2012, Chemical biology & drug design.

[20]  Pawan Gupta,et al.  Identification of Novel HIV‐1 Integrase Inhibitors Using Shape‐Based Screening, QSAR, and Docking Approach , 2012, Chemical biology & drug design.

[21]  R. Kostiainen,et al.  Quantitative determination of phospholipid compositions by ESI-MS: effects of acyl chain length, unsaturation, and lipid concentration on instrument response. , 2001, Journal of lipid research.