From Grammar to Meaning: A scalar semantics for scalar readings of number words

Number words have played a central role in debates about the relation between context and meaning for decades. While current analyses of these terms and the sentences in which they appear differ in their details, they typically agree that interpretations of sentences containing number words crucially involve pragmatic enrichment of a more basic meaning. In the first part of this paper, I present a set of challenges for existing semantic and pragmatic accounts of number word meaning. In the second part, I develop and motivate a fully semantic and compositional analysis of scalar readings of sentences containing numerals, in which number words denote generalized quantifiers over degrees, and scalar readings arise through scopal interactions between number words and other constituents, rather than through pragmatic enrichment.

[1]  Gottlob Frege,et al.  The Foundations of Arithmetic , 2017 .

[2]  Laurence R. Horn,et al.  On the semantic properties of logical operators in english' reproduced by the indiana university lin , 1972 .

[3]  M. Cresswell.  THE SEMANTICS OF DEGREE , 1976 .

[4]  J. Barwise,et al.  Generalized quantifiers and natural language , 1981 .

[5]  D. Schiffrin.  Meaning, form, and use in context : linguistic applications , 1984 .

[6]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  On the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers , 1984 .

[7]  A. Stechow.  COMPARING SEMANTIC THEORIES OF COMPARISON , 1984 .

[8]  Edward L. Keenan,et al.  A semantic characterization of natural language determiners , 1986 .

[9]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics , 1989 .

[10]  Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al.  Scalar predicates and negation: Punctual semantics and interval interpretations , 1991 .

[11]  Laurence R. Horn.  The Said and the Unsaid , 1992 .

[12]  D. Brubeck,et al.  Take five , 1993, Nature.

[13]  Henk Zeevat,et al.  Questions and exhaustivity in update semantics , 1994 .

[14]  R. Scharten,et al.  Exhaustive interpretation : a discourse-semantic account , 1997 .

[15]  Robyn Carston,et al.  Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics , 1998 .

[16]  Robyn Carston,et al.  Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature , 1998 .

[17]  M. Krifka.  At least some Determiners aren ’ t Determiners , 1999 .

[18]  Petra Hendriks,et al.  Review of C. Kennedy, Projecting the adjective. The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison , 1999 .

[19]  I. Heim.  Degree Operators and Scope , 2000 .

[20]  I. Noveck.  When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature , 2001, Cognition.

[21]  A. Papafragou,et al.  Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface , 2003, Cognition.

[22]  Fred Landman,et al.  8. Predicate–argument mismatches and the Adjectival Theory of indefinites , 2003 .

[23]  J. Musolino.  The semantics and acquisition of number words: integrating linguistic and developmental perspectives , 2004, Cognition.

[24]  F. Landman.  Indefinites and the type of sets , 2004 .

[25]  Katrin Schulz,et al.  Exhaustive Interpretation of Complex Sentences , 2004, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[26]  R. Pancheva,et al.  Late Merger of Degree Clauses , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[27]  A. Papafragou,et al.  Children's Computation of Implicatures , 2004 .

[28]  Bert Bultinck.  Numerous Meanings: The Meaning of English Cardinals and the Legacy of Paul Grice , 2005 .

[29]  Danny Fox,et al.  The universal density of measurement , 2007 .

[30]  Ora Matushansky,et al.  The Composition of Complex Cardinals , 2006, J. Semant..

[31]  L. Gleitman,et al.  Asymmetries in the Acquisition of Numbers and Quantifiers , 2006 .

[32]  J. Snedeker,et al.  From Meaning to Inference : Evidence for the distinction between lexical semantics and scalar implicature in online processing and development , 2006 .

[33]  Robert van Rooij,et al.  Pragmatic Meaning and Non-monotonic Reasoning: The Case of Exhaustive Interpretation , 2006 .

[34]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Broaden Your Views: Implicatures of Domain Widening and the Logicality of Language , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[35]  Shoichi Takahashi,et al.  More than Two Quantifiers* , 2006 .

[36]  U. Sauerland,et al.  Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics , 2007 .

[37]  Nathan Salmón.  Wholes, Parts, and Numbers , 2008 .

[38]  Christopher Kennedy,et al.  On 'average' , 2009 .

[39]  G. Chierchia,et al.  The Grammatical View of Scalar Implicatures and the Relationship between Semantics and Pragmatics , 2008 .

[40]  Richard Breheny,et al.  A New Look at the Semantics and Pragmatics of Numerically Quantified Noun Phrases , 2007, J. Semant..

[41]  Gennaro Chierchia,et al.  Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation , 2010, Synthese.

[42]  Susan Rothstein,et al.  Counting, Measuring And The Semantics Of Classifiers , 2010 .

[43]  D. Barner,et al.  Inference and exact numerical representation in early language development , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  R. Nouwen.  Two kinds of modified numerals , 2010 .

[45]  Giorgio Magri.  Another argument for embedded scalar implicatures based on oddness in downward entailing environments , 2011 .

[46]  Daniel Lassiter,et al.  Quantificational and modal interveners in degree constructions , 2012 .

[47]  Daniel E. Geer.  More or Less , 2012, S&P 2012.

[48]  Jesse Snedeker,et al.  What Exactly do Numbers Mean? , 2013, Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development.

[49]  Christopher Potts.  Presupposition and Implicature , 2015 .