Personal ICT Ensembles and Ubiquitous Information Systems Environments: Key Issues and Research Implications

Personal information and communication technologies (ICTs) have become commonplace. Today many people own, or have access to, a range of different computing and communication devices, information technologies, and services, which they incorporate into their everyday routines. Increasingly, these technologies impact the way that individuals work, socialize, and play. Workers are bringing their personal ICTs to the office, and organizations are tailoring their computing environments toward ubiquitous integration with personal ICTs. These developments are opening up new ways of working, but they also create new challenges for organizations in accommodating this “nonaffiliated” use as part of their information systems environments. In this article we propose a framework for analyzing the composition and impact of personal ICT ensembles. The framework is positioned as pre-theory that invites further development and empirical testing. We illustrate how the proposed framework could be applied to consider personal ICT use across the work/home context. Several implications stemming from the notion of a personal ICT ensemble are highlighted, including practical considerations for nonaffiliated use in organizations. We conclude with suggestions for further development of the proposed framework.

[1]  Raquel Benbunan-Fich,et al.  Examining the antecedents of work connectivity behavior during non-work time , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[2]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Human agency in a wireless world: Patterns of technology use in nomadic computing environments , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[3]  Erik Allardt,et al.  Having, Loving, Being: An Alternative to the Swedish Model of Welfare Research , 1993 .

[4]  Noelle Chesley Blurring Boundaries? Linking Technology Use, Spillover, Individual Distress, and Family Satisfaction , 2005 .

[5]  Erik Allardt Dimensions of welfare in a Comparative Scandinavian Study , 1976 .

[6]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concep , 2000, Graphics Interface.

[7]  Ronald T. Cenfetelli Inhibitors and Enablers as Dual Factor Concepts in Technology Usage , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Understanding the Role of Individual Innovativeness in the Acceptance of IT-Based Innovations: Comparative Analyses of Models and Measures , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[10]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experiential Computing , 2010, MIS Q..

[11]  Jonathan Reades,et al.  The Global Information Technology Report 2012 , 2012 .

[12]  J. Greeno Gibson's affordances. , 1994, Psychological review.

[13]  Angsana A. Techatassanasoontorn,et al.  IS Use and Quality Of Life: A Conceptualization and Empirical Investigation , 2010 .

[14]  Jennie Carroll,et al.  Theorizing the IT Artifact for Mobility: A Portfolio, Not a Singularity , 2008, ICIS.

[15]  Donald Hislop,et al.  Do mobile technologies enable work–life balance? Dual perspectives on BlackBerry usage for supplemental work , 2008 .

[16]  Nada K. Kakabadse,et al.  The unbalanced high‐tech life: are employers liable? , 2009 .

[17]  Cheryl Geisler,et al.  Work–life boundary management and the personal digital assistant , 2007 .

[18]  Kristine Dery,et al.  Managing Mobile Technology: The Shift from Mobility to Connectivity , 2012, MIS Q. Executive.

[19]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Looking Forward: Toward an Understanding of the Nature and Definition of IT Acceptance , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[21]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[22]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Affordance, conventions, and design , 1999, INTR.

[23]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Managing the Paradoxes of Mobile Technology , 2005, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[24]  Upkar Varshney,et al.  Designing ubiquitous computing environments to support work life balance , 2009, CACM.

[25]  三嶋 博之 The theory of affordances , 2008 .

[26]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Hun Choi,et al.  Contribution to Quality of Life: A New Outcome Variable for Mobile Data Service , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Wendy L. Cukier,et al.  Is mobile email functional or dysfunctional? Two perspectives on mobile email usage , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Erik Allardt,et al.  Dimensions of Welfare in a Comparative Study of the Scandinavian Societies , 1972 .

[30]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[31]  Ingoo Han,et al.  What drives the adoption of mobile data services? An approach from a value perspective , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[32]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Marketing in the age of the network: From marketplace to U-space , 2004 .

[33]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[34]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Model of Adoption and Technology in Households: A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle , 2005, MIS Q..

[35]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Understanding the Adoption of Multipurpose Information Appliances: The Case of Mobile Data Services , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Contextual influences on user satisfaction with mobile computing: findings from two healthcare organizations , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Saonee Sarker,et al.  Managing Employees' Use of Mobile Technologies to Minimize Work-Life Balance Impacts , 2012, MIS Q. Executive.