The next generation of natural history collections

The last 50 years have witnessed rapid changes in the ways that natural history specimens are collected, preserved, analyzed, and documented. Those changes have produced unprecedented access to specimens, images, and data as well as impressive research results in organismal biology. The stage is now set for a new generation of collecting, preserving, analyzing, and integrating biological samples—a generation devoted to interdisciplinary research into complex biological interactions and processes. Next-generation collections may be essential for breakthrough research on the spread of infectious diseases, feeding Earth's growing population, adapting to climate change, and other grand research challenges. A decade-long investment in research collection infrastructure will be needed.

[1]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Impact of a Century of Climate Change on Small-Mammal Communities in Yosemite National Park, USA , 2008, Science.

[2]  Soberón.  Linking biodiversity information sources. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  Sujeevan Ratnasingham,et al.  Opinion: Why we need a centralized repository for isotopic data , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  S. J. Graves,et al.  Mapping the biosphere: exploring species to understand the origin, organization and sustainability of biodiversity , 2012 .

[5]  C. Malmstrom,et al.  The expanding field of plant virus ecology: historical foundations, knowledge gaps, and research directions. , 2011, Virus research.

[6]  Barbara A. Han,et al.  Updates to the zoonotic niche map of Ebola virus disease in Africa , 2016, eLife.

[7]  Ryan Cross.  New 3D scanning campaign will reveal 20,000 animals in stunning detail , 2017 .

[8]  Marco Thines,et al.  Mining Herbaria for Plant Pathogen Genomes: Back to the Future , 2014, PLoS pathogens.

[9]  S. Morse,et al.  Opinion: Specimen collections should have a much bigger role in infectious disease research and response , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Lawrence M. Page,et al.  Digitization of Biodiversity Collections Reveals Biggest Data on Biodiversity , 2015 .

[11]  A. Peterson,et al.  Potential Mammalian Filovirus Reservoirs , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.

[12]  Bryan S. McLean,et al.  The Beringian coevolution project: Holistic collections of mammals and associated parasites reveal novel perspectives on evolutionary and environmental change in the North , 2016 .

[13]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Integrating biodiversity distribution knowledge: toward a global map of life. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  J L Edwards,et al.  Interoperability of biodiversity databases: biodiversity information on every desktop. , 2000, Science.

[15]  S. Fowler,et al.  Why did specificity testing fail to predict the field host-range of the gorse pod moth in New Zealand? , 2008 .

[16]  Joanna L. Kelley,et al.  Using NextRAD sequencing to infer movement of herbivores among host plants , 2017, PloS one.

[17]  J. Cook,et al.  Biospecimen Repositories and Integrated Databases as Critical Infrastructure for Pathogen Discovery and Pathobiology Research , 2017, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[18]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere , 2012, Nature.

[19]  G. Spellman.  The Extended Specimen: Emerging Frontiers in Collections-Based Ornithological Research , 2019, The Auk.

[20]  P. Downey,et al.  Two in one: cryptic species discovered in biological control agent populations using molecular data and crossbreeding experiments , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[21]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  VertNet: A New Model for Biodiversity Data Sharing , 2010, PLoS biology.

[22]  Jorge Soberón,et al.  Niches and distributional areas: Concepts, methods, and assumptions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Michael A. Thomas,et al.  Ecology: Gene tweaking for conservation , 2013, Nature.