The Impact of Conflict and Conflict Management Style on Deadbeats and Deserters  in Virtual Teams

Individuals face additional challenges when interacting in virtual teams. The lack of media richness and the asynchronous nature of technologically transmitted messages make communication more difficult. Conflicts may be more likely to arise in virtual teams. In this study, team members who were identified as deadbeats by other team members and those who deserted the team were studied. Deadbeats and deserters reported experiencing more conflict and less trust, group cohesion, and satisfaction when working in virtual teams. Analysis of two conflict management approaches showed that deserters were significantly more likely to use an avoidance conflict management style than active team members. Active team members were more likely to use an integrative approach to conflict management. Results of the study suggest that conflict, and the way in which individuals deal with it, may impact the likelihood of social loafing and desertion in virtual teams.

[1]  Stephen P. Robbins,et al.  Managing organizational conflict;: A nontraditional approach , 1974 .

[2]  Albert V. Carron,et al.  Do Individual Perceptions of Group Cohesion Reflect Shared Beliefs? , 2003 .

[3]  Mary-Beth France Watson-Manheim,et al.  Support for Communication-Based Work Processes in Virtual Work , 2002 .

[4]  P. Walden,et al.  Working anywhere, anytime and with anyone , 2000 .

[5]  M. Rahim,et al.  A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. , 1983, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[6]  Victor D. Wall,et al.  Perceptions of Inequity, Satisfaction, and Conflict in Task-Oriented Groups , 1986 .

[7]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[8]  S. Karau,et al.  Social loafing and social compensation: the effects of expectations of co-worker performance. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  S. Karau,et al.  Social loafing and social compensation: the effects of expectations of co-worker performance. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Nathan Bennett,et al.  Employee Propensity to Withhold Effort: A Conceptual Model to Intersect Three Avenues of Research , 1993 .

[12]  J. Brett Managing organizational conflict. , 1984 .

[13]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Use transnational teams to globalize your company , 1996 .

[14]  H. Desivilya,et al.  CONFLICT MANAGEMENT IN WORK TEAMS: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL SELF‐EFFICACY AND GROUP IDENTIFICATION , 2005 .

[15]  Kimberly A. Furumo,et al.  Counting the cost of virtual teams , 2007, CACM.

[16]  Roger C. Pace Personalized and Depersonalized Conflict in Small Group Discussions , 1990 .

[17]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[18]  K. Bollen,et al.  Perceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination , 1990 .

[19]  Annelies E. M. Van Vianen,et al.  Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams , 2001 .

[20]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT AND REFINEMENT OF JEHN'S INTRAGROUP CONFLICT SCALE , 2002 .

[21]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  PROCESSES Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[22]  B. Latané The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[23]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Henri Barki,et al.  Interpersonal Conflict and Its Management in Information System Development , 2001, MIS Q..

[25]  Robin L. Pinkley,et al.  Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. , 1990 .

[26]  Ton van der Smagt Enhancing virtual teams: social relations v. communication technology , 2000, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[27]  Allen C. Amason Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[28]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[29]  K. Jehn ENHANCING EFFECTIVENESS: AN INVESTIGATION OF ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF VALUE‐BASED INTRAGROUP CONFLICT , 1994 .

[30]  K. Jehn A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[31]  J. McGrath Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[32]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Perceived Cohesion in Small Groups , 1999 .

[33]  Bruce A. Reinig,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Satisfaction with the Process and Outcomes of Teamwork , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..