Sacubitril-Valsartan, Clinical Benefits and Related Mechanisms of Action in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. A Review

Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome characterized by the presence of dyspnea or limited exertion due to impaired cardiac ventricular filling and/or blood ejection. Because of its high prevalence, it is a major health and economic burden worldwide. Several mechanisms are involved in the pathophysiology of HF. First, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is over-activated, causing vasoconstriction, hypertension, elevated aldosterone levels and sympathetic tone, and eventually cardiac remodeling. Second, an endogenous compensatory mechanism, the natriuretic peptide (NP) system is also activated, albeit insufficiently to counteract the RAAS effects. Since NPs are degraded by the enzyme neprilysin, it was hypothesized that its inhibition could be an important therapeutic target in HF. Sacubitril/valsartan is the first of the class of dual neprilysin and angiotensin receptor inhibitors (ARNI). In patients with HFrEF, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan has demonstrated to significantly reduce mortality and the rates of hospitalization and rehospitalization for HF when compared to enalapril. This communication reviews in detail the demonstrated benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of patients with HFrEF, including reduction of mortality and disease progression as well as improvement in cardiac remodeling and quality of life. The hemodynamic and organic effects arising from its dual mechanism of action, including the impact of neprilysin inhibition at the renal level, especially relevant in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, are also reviewed. Finally, the evidence on the demonstrated safety and tolerability profile of sacubitril/valsartan in the different subpopulations studied has been compiled. The review of this evidence, together with the recommendations of the latest clinical guidelines, position sacubitril/valsartan as a fundamental pillar in the treatment of patients with HFrEF.

[1]  J. Kasprzak,et al.  A report from the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions 2021 , 2022, Folia Cardiologica.

[2]  No Authors 2021 Update to the 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Optimization of Heart Failure Treatment: Answers to 10 Pivotal Issues About Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction , 2021, KIDNEYS.

[3]  R. McKelvie,et al.  CCS/CHFS Heart Failure Guidelines Update: Defining a New Pharmacologic Standard of Care for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. , 2021, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[4]  K. Witte,et al.  Four pillars of heart failure: contemporary pharmacological therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction , 2021, Open Heart.

[5]  P. Ponikowski,et al.  Universal definition and classification of heart failure: a report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure , 2021, European journal of heart failure.

[6]  A. Bush Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction , 2021, Evidence-Based Practice.

[7]  M. Metra,et al.  Heart failure in the last year: progress and perspective , 2020, ESC heart failure.

[8]  S. Solomon,et al.  Atrial Natriuretic Peptide and Treatment With Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. , 2020, JACC. Heart failure.

[9]  J. Jakobsen,et al.  Beneficial and harmful effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis , 2020, Open Heart.

[10]  A. Bayés‐Genís,et al.  Renal function dynamics following co‐administration of sacubitril/valsartan and empagliflozin in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes , 2020, ESC heart failure.

[11]  P. Ponikowski,et al.  Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure , 2020, New England Journal of Medicine.

[12]  R. Wachter,et al.  NT-proBNP Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction: TRANSITION Study. , 2020, JACC. Heart failure.

[13]  A. Barac,et al.  Left-Ventricular Function After 3 Months of Sacubitril-Valsartan in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure , 2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research.

[14]  S. Solomon,et al.  Reverse Cardiac Remodeling and Outcome After Initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan. , 2020, Circulation. Heart failure.

[15]  P. Abete,et al.  Effect of Sacubitril-Valsartan in reducing depression in patients with advanced heart failure. , 2020, Journal of affective disorders.

[16]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  IMPACT OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND NON-CARDIOVASCULAR HOSPITALIZATION ON QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE AND REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION , 2020 .

[17]  F. Formiga,et al.  Heart failure and diabetes: The confrontation of two major epidemics of the 21st century , 2020 .

[18]  F. Formiga,et al.  Heart failure and diabetes: The confrontation of two major epidemics of the 21st century. , 2020, Revista clinica espanola.

[19]  N. Brunetti,et al.  Sacubitril/valsartan improves right ventricular function in a real-life population of patients with chronic heart failure: The Daunia Heart Failure Registry , 2020, International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature.

[20]  Correction to: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. , 2020, Circulation.

[21]  E. Lonn,et al.  Initiation of sacubitril/valsartan shortly after hospitalisation for acutely decompensated heart failure in patients with newly diagnosed (de novo) heart failure: a subgroup analysis of the TRANSITION study , 2019, European journal of heart failure.

[22]  J. McMurray,et al.  Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. , 2019, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[23]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  S. Solomon,et al.  Association of Change in N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Following Initiation of Sacubitril-Valsartan Treatment With Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. , 2019, JAMA.

[25]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Effect of Sacubitril-Valsartan vs Enalapril on Aortic Stiffness in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2019, JAMA.

[26]  D. Pascual-Figal,et al.  Population-based Study of First Hospitalizations for Heart Failure and the Interaction Between Readmissions and Survival. , 2019, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[27]  P. Ponikowski,et al.  Clinical practice update on heart failure 2019: pharmacotherapy, procedures, devices and patient management. An expert consensus meeting report of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology , 2019, European journal of heart failure.

[28]  Tongda Xu,et al.  Effects of the Angiotensin‐Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor on Cardiac Reverse Remodeling: Meta‐Analysis , 2019, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[29]  M. Packer Compelling First-Line Drug and Device Therapies for the Prevention of Sudden Death in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and a Reduced Ejection Fraction Who Are Candidates for an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator. , 2019, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[30]  E. Lonn,et al.  Initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in haemodynamically stabilised heart failure patients in hospital or early after discharge: primary results of the randomised TRANSITION study , 2019, European journal of heart failure.

[31]  N. Esser,et al.  Neprilysin inhibition: a new therapeutic option for type 2 diabetes? , 2019, Diabetologia.

[32]  Ryan M Burke,et al.  Sacubitril/Valsartan Decreases Cardiac Fibrosis in Left Ventricle Pressure Overload by Restoring PKG Signaling in Cardiac Fibroblasts , 2019, Circulation. Heart failure.

[33]  M. Vaduganathan,et al.  Screening and Management of Depression in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  S. Yun,et al.  Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor for Functional Mitral Regurgitation: PRIME Study , 2019, Circulation.

[35]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Trends in survival after a diagnosis of heart failure in the United Kingdom 2000-2017: population based cohort study , 2019, BMJ.

[36]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Angiotensin–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  F. Giallauria,et al.  Early Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Exercise Tolerance in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction , 2019, Journal of clinical medicine.

[38]  S. Solomon,et al.  Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Biomarkers of Extracellular Matrix Regulation in Patients With HFrEF. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[39]  D. Pennell,et al.  Withdrawal of pharmacological treatment for heart failure in patients with recovered dilated cardiomyopathy (TRED-HF): an open-label, pilot, randomised trial , 2019, The Lancet.

[40]  A. Cohen-Solal,et al.  Effects of sacubitril/valsartan on neprilysin targets and the metabolism of natriuretic peptides in chronic heart failure: a mechanistic clinical study , 2018, European journal of heart failure.

[41]  J. Lupón,et al.  ST2 in Heart Failure. , 2018, Circulation. Heart failure.

[42]  Z. Khan,et al.  Effect of sacubitril/valsartan on cardiac filling pressures in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. , 2018, International journal of cardiology.

[43]  M. Landray,et al.  Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Irbesartan in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial , 2018, Circulation.

[44]  G. Filippatos,et al.  Heart failure and diabetes: metabolic alterations and therapeutic interventions: a state-of-the-art review from the Translational Research Committee of the Heart Failure Association–European Society of Cardiology , 2018, European heart journal.

[45]  A. Bayés‐Genís,et al.  Is Sacubitril/Valsartan (Also) an Antiarrhythmic Drug? , 2018, Circulation.

[46]  L. Vicent,et al.  Clinical Profile of a Nonselected Population Treated With Sacubitril/Valsartan Is Different From PARADIGM-HF Trial , 2018, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.

[47]  C. Lam,et al.  Correlation of the New York Heart Association classification and the cardiopulmonary exercise test: A systematic review. , 2018, International journal of cardiology.

[48]  S. Solomon,et al.  Effect of neprilysin inhibition on renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic heart failure who are receiving target doses of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system: a secondary analysis of the PARADIGM-HF trial. , 2018, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[49]  P. Vandervoort,et al.  The reverse remodeling response to sacubitril/valsartan therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction , 2018, Cardiovascular therapeutics.

[50]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Physical and Social Activity Limitations in Patients With Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the PARADIGM-HF Trial , 2018, JAMA cardiology.

[51]  S. Solomon,et al.  Independent Prognostic Value of Serum Soluble ST2 Measurements in Patients With Heart Failure and a Reduced Ejection Fraction in the PARADIGM-HF Trial (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) , 2018, Circulation. Heart failure.

[52]  J. McMurray,et al.  Barcelona Bio‐HF Calculator Version 2.0: incorporation of angiotensin II receptor blocker neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and risk for heart failure hospitalization , 2018, European journal of heart failure.

[53]  R. Harrington,et al.  Cost‐Effectiveness Analysis of Sacubitril/Valsartan for the Treatment of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction in the United States , 2018, Pharmacotherapy.

[54]  S. Solomon,et al.  Rationale and methods of the Prospective Study of Biomarkers, Symptom Improvement, and Ventricular Remodeling During Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy for Heart Failure (PROVE‐HF) , 2018, American heart journal.

[55]  D. Bolignano,et al.  Faculty of 1000 evaluation for Effect of neprilysin inhibition on renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic heart failure who are receiving target doses of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system: a secondary analysis of the PARADIGM-HF trial. , 2018 .

[56]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Renal Effects and Associated Outcomes During Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure. , 2018, JACC. Heart failure.

[57]  G. Filippatos,et al.  Type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure: a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology , 2018, European journal of heart failure.

[58]  H. Koiwaya,et al.  Combined Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibitors Improve Cardiac and Vascular Function Via Increased NO Bioavailability in Heart Failure , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[59]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Effect of sacubitril/valsartan on recurrent events in the Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial (PARADIGM‐HF) , 2018, European journal of heart failure.

[60]  A. Bayés‐Genís,et al.  Sacubitril/valsartan and short-term changes in the 6-minute walk test: A pilot study. , 2018, International journal of cardiology.

[61]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[62]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Sacubitril/valsartan reduces serum uric acid concentration, an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in PARADIGM‐HF , 2017, European journal of heart failure.

[63]  J. Almendral,et al.  Effects of angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition compared to angiotensin inhibition on ventricular arrhythmias in reduced ejection fraction patients under continuous remote monitoring of implantable defibrillator devices. , 2017, Heart rhythm.

[64]  J. Lupón,et al.  Soluble ST2 for Prognosis and Monitoring in Heart Failure: The New Gold Standard? , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[65]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in PARADIGM-HF , 2017, Circulation. Heart failure.

[66]  S. Solomon,et al.  Declining Risk of Sudden Death in Heart Failure , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[67]  M. Vaduganathan,et al.  Neprilysin inhibition in heart failure: mechanisms and substrates beyond modulating natriuretic peptides , 2017, European journal of heart failure.

[68]  Jun Guo,et al.  The renal and cardiovascular effects of natriuretic peptides. , 2017, Advances in physiology education.

[69]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Effect of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril on glycaemic control in patients with heart failure and diabetes: a post-hoc analysis from the PARADIGM-HF trial. , 2017, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[70]  A. Bayés‐Genís,et al.  Mechanisms of action of sacubitril/valsartan on cardiac remodeling: a systems biology approach , 2017, npj Systems Biology and Applications.

[71]  S. Solomon,et al.  Systolic blood pressure, cardiovascular outcomes and efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: results from PARADIGM-HF , 2017, European heart journal.

[72]  D. Campbell,et al.  Long-term neprilysin inhibition — implications for ARNIs , 2017, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[73]  Ramachandran S Vasan,et al.  Biomarkers in cardiovascular disease: Statistical assessment and section on key novel heart failure biomarkers. , 2017, Trends in cardiovascular medicine.

[74]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Prognostic Implications of Changes in N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Heart Failure. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[75]  J. Díez Chronic heart failure as a state of reduced effectiveness of the natriuretic peptide system: implications for therapy , 2016, European journal of heart failure.

[76]  S. Solomon,et al.  Combined neprilysin and renin–angiotensin system inhibition in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta‐analysis , 2016, European journal of heart failure.

[77]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan Relative to a Prior Decompensation: The PARADIGM-HF Trial. , 2016, JACC. Heart failure.

[78]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Influence of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) on 30-Day Readmission After Heart Failure Hospitalization. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[79]  F. Formiga,et al.  Prognostic Role of Hyperuricemia in Acute Heart Failure. , 2016, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[80]  R. Wachter,et al.  Initiating sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in heart failure: results of TITRATION, a double‐blind, randomized comparison of two uptitration regimens , 2016, European journal of heart failure.

[81]  S. Solomon,et al.  Importance of Clinical Worsening of Heart Failure Treated in the Outpatient Setting: Evidence From the Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure Trial (PARADIGM-HF). , 2016, Circulation.

[82]  M. Crespo-Leiro,et al.  Health-related Quality of Life of Patients With Chronic Systolic Heart Failure in Spain: Results of the VIDA-IC Study. , 2016, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[83]  A. Doney,et al.  Mean HbA1c and mortality in diabetic individuals with heart failure: a population cohort study , 2016, European journal of heart failure.

[84]  C. Lam,et al.  Correlation of the New York Heart Association Classification and the 6‐Minute Walk Distance: A Systematic Review , 2015, Clinical cardiology.

[85]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Effect of the angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 compared with enalapril on mode of death in heart failure patients. , 2015, European heart journal.

[86]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Efficacy and safety of LCZ696 (sacubitril-valsartan) according to age: insights from PARADIGM-HF , 2015, European heart journal.

[87]  G. Remuzzi,et al.  Combined neprilysin and RAS inhibition for the failing heart: straining the kidney to help the heart? , 2015, European journal of heart failure.

[88]  M. Gold,et al.  The effect of reverse remodeling on long-term survival in mildly symptomatic patients with heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the REVERSE study. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[89]  C. V. Jaarsveld,et al.  Sleep and nighttime energy consumption in early childhood: a population‐based cohort study , 2015, Pediatric obesity.

[90]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibition Compared With Enalapril on the Risk of Clinical Progression in Surviving Patients With Heart Failure , 2015, Circulation.

[91]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[92]  M. Landray,et al.  Neprilysin inhibition in chronic kidney disease , 2014, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[93]  A. Vaag,et al.  Association of heart failure severity with risk of diabetes: a Danish nationwide cohort study , 2014, Diabetologia.

[94]  M. Drazner,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[95]  S. Solomon,et al.  The angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a phase 2 double-blind randomised controlled trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[96]  W. Kraus,et al.  Modest Increase in Peak VO2 Is Related to Better Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Heart Failure Patients: Results From Heart Failure and a Controlled Trial to Investigate Outcomes of Exercise Training , 2012, Circulation. Heart failure.

[97]  Akshay S. Desai The three-phase terrain of heart failure readmissions. , 2012, Circulation. Heart failure.

[98]  P. Austin,et al.  Lifetime Analysis of Hospitalizations and Survival of Patients Newly Admitted With Heart Failure , 2012, Circulation. Heart failure.

[99]  Silvia G Priori,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. , 2011, Circulation.

[100]  T. Trikalinos,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of drug or device effects on ventricular remodeling as predictors of therapeutic effects on mortality in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analytic approach. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[101]  D. Noble,et al.  Systems Biology: An Approach , 2010, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[102]  B. Pitt,et al.  Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Effect of Aldosterone Antagonism With Eplerenone on Ventricular Remodeling in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction , 2010, Circulation. Heart failure.

[103]  L. Ruilope,et al.  Blood-pressure reduction with LCZ696, a novel dual-acting inhibitor of the angiotensin II receptor and neprilysin: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active comparator study , 2010, The Lancet.

[104]  M. Gold,et al.  Cardiac Resynchronization Induces Major Structural and Functional Reverse Remodeling in Patients With New York Heart Association Class I/II Heart Failure , 2009, Circulation.

[105]  M. Cicoira,et al.  Oxidative stress and hyperuricaemia: pathophysiology, clinical relevance, and therapeutic implications in chronic heart failure , 2009, European journal of heart failure.

[106]  M. Law,et al.  The Transition Study , 2006 .

[107]  Karl Swedberg,et al.  Influence of Ejection Fraction on Cardiovascular Outcomes in a Broad Spectrum of Heart Failure Patients , 2005, Circulation.

[108]  J. Cohn,et al.  Severity of left ventricular remodeling defines outcomes and response to therapy in heart failure: Valsartan heart failure trial (Val-HeFT) echocardiographic data. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[109]  B. Greenberg Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors on remodeling in clinical trials. , 2002, Journal of cardiac failure.

[110]  E. Fleck,et al.  Vasopeptidase inhibition with omapatrilat in chronic heart failure: acute and long-term hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[111]  J. Cohn,et al.  Cardiac remodeling--concepts and clinical implications: a consensus paper from an international forum on cardiac remodeling. Behalf of an International Forum on Cardiac Remodeling. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[112]  C. Baird The pilot study. , 2000, Orthopedic nursing.

[113]  D. Webb,et al.  Inhibition of neutral endopeptidase causes vasoconstriction of human resistance vessels in vivo. , 1998, Circulation.

[114]  R. Busse,et al.  Neurohormonal Inhibition and Hemodynamic Unloading During Prolonged Inhibition of ANF Degradation in Patients With Severe Chronic Heart Failure , 1992, Circulation.

[115]  A. Bayés‐Genís,et al.  Early Sacubitril/Valsartan-driven Benefit on Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Pilot Study. , 2019, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[116]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Reduced Risk of Hyperkalemia During Treatment of Heart Failure With Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists by Use of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Enalapril: A Secondary Analysis of the PARADIGM-HF Trial , 2017, JAMA cardiology.

[117]  Mustafa Saad,et al.  Implications for Therapy , 2016 .

[118]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Heart failure. , 2013, JACC. Heart failure.

[119]  Biykem Bozkurt,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. , 2013, Circulation.

[120]  M. Cheitlin Cardiac Resynchronization Induces Major Structural and Functional Reverse Remodeling in Patients With New York Heart Association Class I/II Heart Failure , 2011 .

[121]  M. Dimatteo,et al.  Physician Communication and Patient Adherence to Treatment: A Meta-Analysis , 2009, Medical care.

[122]  L. Rydén,et al.  The Benefits of Early Combination Treatment of Carvedilol and an ACE-Inhibitor in Mild Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction. The Carvedilol and ACE-Inhibitor Remodelling Mild Heart Failure Evaluation Trial (CARMEN) , 2004, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy.

[123]  E. Glaser The randomized clinical trial. , 1972, The New England journal of medicine.