Economics of climate change under uncertainty: Benefits of flexibility

The selection of climate policy has to be made in an extremely uncertain environment: both benefits and costs of a particular climate policy are unknown and in the best case could be described by the probability distribution of various outcomes. Dominated in literature, the expected value approach to the cost-benefit analysis of climate policy under uncertainties relies on the aggregated estimation of various outcomes of climate policy weighted and averaged by probabilities. The variance, skewness, and kurtosis are important characteristics of uncertainties but can be easily lost in the process of aggregation. The real option analysis (ROA) explicitly accounts for both the expected value of underling assets and the variance of the expected value (as well as skewness and kurtosis that are important to describe a fat tail phenomenon). In the paper, we propose an application of the real option analysis in order to formulate rules for the selection of a climate policy (emission target) and estimate the economic value of the future flexibility created by interim climate policy, which may be corrected in the future in response to new knowledge that hopefully reduces uncertainties. The initially selected interim policy has an option value and methodology for its valuation presented in the paper.

[1]  W. Nordhaus.  A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies , 2008 .

[2]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Real Options and Investment under Uncertainty: Classical Readings and Recent Contributions , 2004 .

[3]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change , 2007 .

[4]  OPTION PRICING MODELS & VOLATILITY USING EXCEL s -VBA , 2007 .

[5]  Bengt Kriström,et al.  Uncertainty and Climate Change , 2002 .

[6]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  Is the Uncertainty about Climate Change too Large for Expected Cost-Benefit Analysis? , 2003 .

[7]  Johnathan Mun,et al.  Modeling Risk: Applying Monte Carlo Simulation, Real Options Analysis, Forecasting, and Optimization Techniques , 2006 .

[8]  E. Haug.  The complete guide to option pricing formulas , 1997 .

[9]  Fabrice Douglas Rouah,et al.  Option Pricing Models and Volatility Using Excel-VBA , 2007 .

[10]  James Norton,et al.  Learning about climate change and implications for near-term policy , 2008 .

[11]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  AEI-Brookings Joint Center Working Paper , 2007 .

[12]  W. Nordhaus.  The "Stern Review" on the Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[13]  Michael D Mastrandrea,et al.  Probabilistic Integrated Assessment of "Dangerous" Climate Change , 2004, Science.

[14]  Robert S. Pindyck,et al.  Irreversibilities and the Timing of Environmental Policy , 2000 .

[15]  J. Primbs,et al.  Distribution-Based Option Pricing On Lattice Asset Dynamics Models , 2002 .

[16]  N. Stern.  The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[17]  P. Embrechts,et al.  Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques, and Tools , 2005 .

[18]  Martin Weitzman,et al.  Role of Uncertainty in the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change , 2007 .

[19]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[20]  OPTION PRICING MODELS & VOLATILITY USING EXCEL®-VBA , 2007 .

[21]  T. Copeland.  Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide , 2001 .

[22]  Tyrone T. Lin,et al.  Applying real options in investment decisions relating to environmental pollution , 2007 .

[23]  L. Trigeorgis.  Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation , 1996 .

[24]  Gary Yohe,et al.  To Hedge or Not Against an Uncertain Climate Future? , 2004, Science.

[25]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[26]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .