The CAPITAL in Social Capital: An Austrian Perspective

In recent decades economists started discovering the importance of the social dimension of economic interactions. Contemporary economics has borrowed several sociological concepts for its own use, among the most important being the concept of social capital. However, this transfer within disciplines did not occur without a loss-the nature of social capital in economics remains confused and obscure. The purpose of this article is to clarify it, specify the possibilities for its use, and discuss their limits. It is argued that economics once also possessed a view of human beings that was more "socialized" than the modern neoclassical "Homo oeconomicus," and that this more "socialized" view still exists in the Austrian school of economics. Because this tradition of economic thought has also developed an elaborate capital theory, it can serve as an ideal source where we can look for inspiration in the current social capital debate. First, social capital is (re)defined along these lines as an individual's asset connected with recognized reciprocity (as opposed to interactions usually classified as "altruistic"). Then major critical claims about the relation between social and physical capital are answered and the connection between social capital, trust, and social norms is described. Copyright © 2010 American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Inc..

[1]  C. Murray,et al.  Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950-1980 , 1984 .

[2]  Pavel Chalupníček,et al.  Health Insurance before the Welfare State: The Destruction of Self-Help by State Intervention , 2009 .

[3]  A. Portes Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[4]  Stephen E. Margolis,et al.  Network externality : an uncommon tragedy , 1994 .

[5]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Gary S. Becker,et al.  Accounting for Tastes , 1997 .

[7]  D. North Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[8]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  G. Becker,et al.  Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, Third Edition , 1993 .

[11]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Coping with Asymmetries in the Commons: Self-Governing Irrigation Systems Can Work , 1993 .

[12]  Stephen F. Knack,et al.  Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation , 1997 .

[13]  F. Hayek,et al.  Law, Legislation and Liberty. Volume I. Rules and Order. , 1974 .

[14]  P. Leeson Balkanization and assimilation: Examining the effects of state-created homogeneity , 2007 .

[15]  Peter Lewin,et al.  Time, change, and complexity: Ludwig M. Lachmann's contributions to the theory of capital , 1996 .

[16]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[17]  N. Lin Social Capital: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[18]  Simon Cordery British Friendly Societies, 1750-1914 , 2003 .

[19]  J. Sobel Can We Trust Social Capital , 2002 .

[20]  N. Lin Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action , 2001 .

[21]  Bethany Peters,et al.  No booze? You may lose: Why drinkers earn more money than nondrinkers , 2006 .

[22]  Christopher J. Coyne,et al.  Government intervention and the structure of social capital , 2008 .

[23]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[24]  Peter J. Boettke,et al.  Methodological Individualism, Spontaneous Order and the Research Program of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis , 2005 .

[25]  An ‘Austrian’ Perspective on Public Choice , 2003 .

[26]  Marcel Fafchamps,et al.  Solidarity Networks in Preindustrial Societies: Rational Peasants with a Moral Economy , 1992, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[27]  R. Burt The Social Structure of Competition , 2004 .

[28]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Trust: Forms, Foundations, Functions, Failures and Figures , 2003 .

[29]  F. Hayek,et al.  The Pure Theory of Capital , 1941 .

[30]  B. Benson The impetus for recognizing private property and adopting ethical behavior in a market economy: Natural law, government law, or evolving self-interest , 1993 .

[31]  A. Portes The Two Meanings of Social Capital , 2000 .

[32]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .