Quantifying the Conceptual Combination Effect on Word Meanings

How do people understand concepts such as dog, aggressive dog, dog house or house dog? The meaning of a concept depends crucially on the concepts around it. While this hypothesis has existed for a long time, only recently it has become possible to test it based on neuroimaging and quantify it using computational modeling. In this paper, a neural network is trained with backpropagation to map attributebased semantic representations to fMRI images of subjects reading everyday sentences. Backpropagation is then extended to the attributes, demonstrating how word meanings change in different contexts. Across a large corpus of sentences, the new attributes are more similar to the attributes of other words in the sentence than they are to the original attributes, demonstrating that the meaning of the context is transferred to a degree to each word in the sentence. Such dynamic conceptual combination effects could be included in natural language processing systems to encode rich contextual embeddings to mirror human performance more accurately.

[1]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[2]  Diane Pecher,et al.  Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: Modality-specific effects of prior activation , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[4]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Influence of Thematic Relations on the Comprehension of Modifier–noun Combinations , 1997 .

[5]  Mark A. Chevillet,et al.  Evaluating semantic models with word-sentence relatedness , 2016, ArXiv.

[6]  Massimo Poesio,et al.  Strudel: A Corpus-Based Semantic Model Based on Properties and Types , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions , 2012, Cortex.

[8]  Curt Burgess,et al.  From simple associations to the building blocks of language: Modeling meaning in memory with the HAL model , 1998 .

[9]  Jing Wang,et al.  Neural representations of the concepts in simple sentences: Concept activation prediction and context effects , 2017, NeuroImage.

[10]  Mirella Lapata,et al.  Composition in Distributional Models of Semantics , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination , 1990 .

[12]  Mario Aguilar,et al.  Predicting Neural Activity Patterns Associated with Sentences Using a Neurobiologically Motivated Model of Semantic Representation , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Rutvik H. Desai,et al.  Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation , 2016, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[15]  E. Wisniewski,et al.  Property instantiation in conceptual combination , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Combining fMRI Data and Neural Networks to Quantify Contextual Effects in the Brain , 2018, BI.

[17]  Rutvik H. Desai,et al.  The neurobiology of semantic memory , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Natural Language Processing With Modular PDP Networks and Distributed Lexicon , 1991, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  J. Binder In defense of abstract conceptual representations , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[20]  Zellig S. Harris,et al.  Distributional Structure , 1954 .

[21]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.