Is there a better way to biopsy the prostate? Prospects for a novel transrectal systematic biopsy approach.

The study reported here was undertaken to investigate a novel method of systematic, 3-dimensional, template-guided, transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. The TargetScan transrectal ultrasound and prostatic biopsy system (Envisioneering Medical Technologies, St. Louis, MO) uses a stationary transrectal ultrasound probe that acquires 3-dimensional and simultaneous biplanar ultrasound imaging. With the use of prostate-specific measurements, targeted transrectal biopsy specimens of the prostate are taken. The precise location of each specimen is defined by 2 coordinates: depth in centimeters proximal from the apex of the prostate, and degree of rotation (clockwise or counterclockwise from 12 o'clock). This device has been evaluated when used with radical prostatectomy specimens. Studies on 20 radical prostatectomy specimens disclosed that simulated TargetScan biopsy correctly identified cancer in 16 (80%) prostates and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in 2 others. Simulated TargetScan biopsy correctly characterized 88% of prostatic octants in terms of whether or not they harbored cancer. This technique was reproducible from operator to operator, and 85% biopsy core concordance was attained when the TargetScan protocol was simulated in 2 urology residents. The TargetScan biopsy system seems to be an effective transrectal alternative to transperineal, 3-dimensional, ultrasound-guided biopsies. Its reproducibility from operator to operator suggests that it may be useful for guiding rebiopsy of specific locations within the prostate and for providing targeted focal prostate cancer therapy.

[1]  V. Pansadoro,et al.  Increased accuracy of biopsy Gleason score obtained by extended needle biopsy. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[2]  T. Stamey,et al.  Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies. , 1995, Urology.

[3]  Holly T. Sullivan,et al.  Clinical staging of prostate cancer: a computer‐simulated study of transperineal prostate biopsy , 2005, BJU international.

[4]  K. Shinohara,et al.  The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[5]  J. Epstein,et al.  Does increased needle biopsy sampling of the prostate detect a higher number of potentially insignificant tumors? , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[6]  S. Madersbacher,et al.  Twelve prostate biopsies detect significant cancer volumes (> 0.5 mL) , 2000, BJU international.

[7]  Seymour Rosen,et al.  Extended prostate needle biopsy improves concordance of Gleason grading between prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[8]  M. Soloway,et al.  Biochemical and pathological predictors of the recurrence of prostatic adenocarcinoma with seminal vesicle invasion. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[9]  W. Fair,et al.  Incidence and clinical significance of false-negative sextant prostate biopsies. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[10]  J. Presti,et al.  Prostate biopsy: how many cores are enough? , 2003, Urologic oncology.

[11]  T. Stamey,et al.  Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[12]  M. Terris,et al.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[13]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Gleason grading of prostatic needle biopsies. Correlation with grade in 316 matched prostatectomies. , 1994, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[14]  D. Theodorescu,et al.  The effect of sampling more cores on the predictive accuracy of pathological grade and tumour distribution in the prostate biopsy , 2004, BJU international.

[15]  Christopher R King,et al.  Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  P. Humphrey,et al.  Multiple Measures of Carcinoma Extent Versus Perineural Invasion in Prostate Needle Biopsy Tissue in Prediction of Pathologic Stage in a Screening Population , 2003, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[17]  M. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively? , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[18]  Yan Yan,et al.  Relating biopsy and clinical variables to radical prostatectomy findings: can insignificant and advanced prostate cancer be predicted in a screening population? , 2004, Urology.

[19]  Robert W Veltri,et al.  Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study. , 2003, The Journal of urology.