Neural underpinnings of superior action prediction abilities in soccer players.

The ability to form anticipatory representations of ongoing actions is crucial for effective interactions in dynamic environments. In sports, elite athletes exhibit greater ability than novices in predicting other players' actions, mainly based on reading their body kinematics. This superior perceptual ability has been associated with a modulation of visual and motor areas by visual and motor expertise. Here, we investigated the causative role of visual and motor action representations in experts' ability to predict the outcome of soccer actions. We asked expert soccer players (outfield players and goalkeepers) and novices to predict the direction of the ball after perceiving the initial phases of penalty kicks that contained or not incongruent body kinematics. During the task, we applied repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the superior temporal sulcus (STS) and the dorsal premotor cortex (PMd). Results showed that STS-rTMS disrupted performance in both experts and novices, especially in those with greater visual expertise (i.e. goalkeepers). Conversely, PMd-rTMS impaired performance only in expert players (i.e. outfield players and goalkeepers), who exhibit strong motor expertise into facing domain-specific actions in soccer games. These results provide causative evidence of the complimentary functional role of visual and motor action representations in experts' action prediction.

[1]  R. Nebes,et al.  Patterns of Hand Preference in a Student Population , 1975, Cortex.

[2]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[3]  J. Stein,et al.  Analysis of information processing, decision making, and visual strategies in complex problem solving sport situations , 1995 .

[4]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[6]  E. Wassermann Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  B. Greenberg,et al.  What is transcranial magnetic stimulation? , 2003, The Harvard mental health letter.

[8]  J. Decety,et al.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta‐analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[9]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[10]  W. Prinz,et al.  Motor learning enhances perceptual judgment: a case for action-perception transfer , 2001, Psychological research.

[11]  Karl Verfaillie,et al.  Representing and anticipating human actions in vision , 2002 .

[12]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a neurochromometrics of mind. , 2003 .

[13]  D. Perrett,et al.  Perceptual History Influences Neural Responses to Face and Body Postures , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Do Expertise and the Degree of Perception—Action Coupling Affect Natural Anticipatory Performance? , 2003, Perception.

[15]  R. Hari,et al.  Abnormal imitation‐related cortical activation sequences in Asperger's syndrome , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[16]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  R. Miall,et al.  A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[19]  G. Knoblich,et al.  The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  R. Passingham,et al.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Cognitive, perceptual and action-oriented representations of falling objects , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  L. Craighero,et al.  Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others’ action , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[23]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Repetitive TMS over posterior STS disrupts perception of biological motion , 2005, Vision Research.

[24]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Anticipation skill and susceptibility to deceptive movement. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[25]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Building a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[26]  R. Passingham,et al.  Seeing or Doing? Influence of Visual and Motor Familiarity in Action Observation , 2006, Current Biology.

[27]  M. Giese,et al.  Nonvisual Motor Training Influences Biological Motion Perception , 2006, Current Biology.

[28]  John van der Kamp,et al.  A field simulation study of the effectiveness of penalty kick strategies in soccer: Late alterations of kick direction increase errors and reduce accuracy , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[29]  M. Candidi,et al.  Representation of body identity and body actions in extrastriate body area and ventral premotor cortex , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Prospective coding in event representation , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[31]  A. Saygin Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  Nadia Bolognini,et al.  Somatic and Motor Components of Action Simulation , 2007, Current Biology.

[33]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Pickup of Essential Kinematics Underpins Expert Perception of Movement Patterns , 2007, Journal of motor behavior.

[34]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Expertise and Attunement to Kinematic Constraints , 2008, Perception.

[36]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  Frank Van Overwalle,et al.  Understanding others' actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis , 2009, NeuroImage.

[38]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[39]  D. Perrett,et al.  EPS Mid-Career Award 2008 Seeing the future : Natural image sequences produce “ anticipatory ” neuronal activity and bias perceptual report , 2009 .

[40]  C. Keysers,et al.  The Observation and Execution of Actions Share Motor and Somatosensory Voxels in all Tested Subjects: Single-Subject Analyses of Unsmoothed fMRI Data , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Detecting deception in a bluffing body: The role of expertise , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  S. Swinnen,et al.  How are observed actions mapped to the observer’s motor system? Influence of posture and perspective , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Dissociable substrates for body motion and physical experience in the human action observation network , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[44]  Scott T. Grafton Embodied Cognition and the Simulation of Action to Understand Others , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain , 2010, NeuroImage.

[46]  C. Craig,et al.  Bending It Like Beckham: How to Visually Fool the Goalkeeper , 2010, PloS one.

[47]  John van der Kamp,et al.  An examination of motor and perceptual contributions to the recognition of deception from others' actions. , 2010, Human movement science.

[48]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  R. Kulpa,et al.  Balancing deceit and disguise: how to successfully fool the defender in a 1 vs. 1 situation in rugby. , 2010, Human movement science.

[50]  P. Haggard,et al.  Extrastriate body area underlies aesthetic evaluation of body stimuli , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  M. Weigelt,et al.  Trust my face: cognitive factors of head fakes in sports. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[52]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  The Impact of Aesthetic Evaluation and Physical Ability on Dance Perception , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[53]  Cosimo Urgesi,et al.  Understanding 'what' others do: mirror mechanisms play a crucial role in action perception. , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[54]  R Huys,et al.  Anticipation of tennis-shot direction from whole-body movement: the role of movement amplitude and dynamics. , 2011, Human movement science.

[55]  Anne Springer,et al.  Predicting and memorizing observed action: Differential premotor cortex involvement , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[56]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Action understanding and active inference , 2011, Biological Cybernetics.

[57]  G. Vingerhoets,et al.  Influence of perspective on the neural correlates of motor resonance during natural action observation , 2012, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[58]  Matthew Hudson,et al.  Doing, seeing, or both: Effects of learning condition on subsequent action perception , 2012, Social neuroscience.

[59]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  Effects of TMS over Premotor and Superior Temporal Cortices on Biological Motion Perception , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  Cosimo Urgesi,et al.  Long- and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball , 2011, Psychological Research.

[61]  E Macaluso,et al.  Action anticipation beyond the action observation network: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in expert basketball players , 2012, The European journal of neuroscience.

[62]  Paola Cesari,et al.  Fooling the kickers but not the goalkeepers: behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of fake action detection in soccer. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[63]  Emmanuele Tidoni,et al.  Action Simulation Plays a Critical Role in Deceptive Action Recognition , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[64]  Cosimo Urgesi,et al.  Vicarious motor activation during action perception: beyond correlational evidence , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[65]  Cosimo Urgesi,et al.  Compensatory plasticity in the action observation network: virtual lesions of STS enhance anticipatory simulation of seen actions. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[66]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2014, Neuromethods.