Temporal validation of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of energy systems in China

Abstract When assessing the environmental impact of a product or system, the life cycle assessment (LCA) is one of the most accepted methods. However, LCA relies heavily on the fundamental data sources, especially for energy related inventory database. The energy related inventory database is the basis of life cycle assessment for a product or system. Due to the great variety and the frequent updates of the energy related inventory database, the effect of temporal variables on life cycle inventory results should be quantified and interpreted in LCA case studies. In this study, a life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions calculation model for various energy sources is developed, and the life cycle GHG emissions of six types of energy in China in 2003 and 2013 are calculated and compared. There are significant reductions of 10.60–33.40% for different types of energy when using database of 2013 compared to 2003. To fill the temporal gaps, we develop a generic methodology for screening out the key temporal parameters in life cycle inventory analysis of energy upstream. Nine key temporal parameters related to the life cycle GHG emissions of six types of energy are screened out by sensitivity analysis coupled temporal variability analysis. The update interval of these parameters is quantified and suggested to ensure the reliability of analysis results. This methodology can help to reduce the maintenance workload of the database, and to provide a foundation for improving the reliability of life cycle analysis results for a product or system.

[1]  Jinglan Hong,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of three coal-based electricity generation scenarios in China , 2012 .

[2]  G. Treloar Extracting Embodied Energy Paths from Input–Output Tables: Towards an Input–Output-based Hybrid Energy Analysis Method , 1997 .

[3]  D. Iribarren,et al.  Life-cycle performance of hydrogen as an energy management solution in hydropower plants: A case study in Central Italy , 2015 .

[4]  Hiroki Hondo,et al.  Life cycle GHG emission analysis of power generation systems: Japanese case , 2005 .

[5]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Survey of approaches to improve reliability in lca , 2002 .

[6]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[7]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Differential Convergence of Life‐Cycle Inventories toward Upstream Production Layers , 2002 .

[8]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Scott W. White,et al.  Birth to death analysis of the energy payback ratio and CO2 gas emission rates from coal, fission, wind, and DT-fusion electrical power plants , 2000 .

[10]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Errors in Conventional and Input‐Output—based Life—Cycle Inventories , 2000 .

[11]  Jun Guan,et al.  Quantification of building embodied energy in China using an input–output-based hybrid LCA model , 2016 .

[12]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Functions, commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological–economic model , 2004 .

[13]  Bing Xue,et al.  A life cycle co-benefits assessment of wind power in China , 2015 .

[14]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA , 1998 .

[15]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity from fossil fuels in Turkey , 2015 .

[16]  Ge Quansheng,et al.  Method for Calculating CO2 Emissions from the Power Sector at the Provincial Level in China , 2014 .

[17]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Life-cycle energy and emission analysis of power generation from forest biomass , 2014 .

[18]  Jegannathan Kenthorai Raman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of algae biodiesel and its co-products , 2016 .

[19]  Qiping Shen,et al.  Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: Two case studies of residential projects , 2013 .

[20]  Thomas A. Adams,et al.  Comparative life cycle analyses of bulk-scale coal-fueled solid oxide fuel cell power plants , 2015 .

[21]  Tim Cockerill,et al.  Life cycle analysis of UK coal fired power plants , 2008 .

[22]  Yim Ling Siu,et al.  The energy and water nexus in Chinese electricity production: A hybrid life cycle analysis , 2014 .

[23]  Tim Cockerill,et al.  Life cycle GHG assessment of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage , 2008 .

[24]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Constructing a Time Series of Nested Multiregion Input–Output Tables , 2017 .

[25]  Joris Koornneef,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a pulverized coal power plant with post-combustion capture, transport and storage of CO2 , 2008 .

[26]  Yu Qian,et al.  Life cycle assessment of coal-based methanol , 2012 .

[27]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  R. Ries,et al.  The quantification of the embodied impacts of construction projects on energy, environment, and society based on I-O LCA , 2011 .

[29]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Life-cycle energy analysis of building integrated photovoltaic systems (BiPVs) with heat recovery unit , 2006 .

[30]  Troy R. Hawkins,et al.  Hybrid Framework for Managing Uncertainty in Life Cycle Inventories , 2009 .

[31]  Bin Su,et al.  Life cycle analysis on carbon emissions from power generation – The nuclear energy example , 2014 .