The Good, the Bad, the Clunky: Improving the Use of Administrative Data for Research
暂无分享,去创建一个
Paul Jackson | Kerina H. Jones | Sharon Heys | Karen Tingay | Chris Dibben | P. Jackson | K. Jones | C. Dibben | Sharon Heys | K. Tingay | Karen Tingay
[1] Kerina H. Jones,et al. The SAIL databank: linking multiple health and social care datasets , 2009, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..
[2] R. Lyons,et al. The SAIL Databank: building a national architecture for e-health research and evaluation , 2009, BMC health services research.
[3] Nayha Sethi,et al. Delivering proportionate governance in the era of eHealth , 2013, Medical law international.
[4] Matthew Woollard,et al. Administrative Data: Problems and Benefits. A perspective from the United Kingdom , 2014 .
[5] Simon Thompson,et al. A case study of the Secure Anonymous Information Linkage (SAIL) Gateway: A privacy-protecting remote access system for health-related research and evaluation☆ , 2014, J. Biomed. Informatics.
[6] Pam Carter,et al. The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble , 2015, Journal of Medical Ethics.
[7] K. O’Hara,et al. The Anonymisation Decision-Making Framework , 2016 .
[8] Vernon Gayle,et al. The role of administrative data in the big data revolution in social science research. , 2016, Social science research.
[9] Kerina H. Jones,et al. The other side of the coin: harm due to the non-use of health-related data , 2016, Int. J. Medical Informatics.
[10] Harvey Goldstein,et al. Challenges in administrative data linkage for research , 2017, Big Data Soc..
[11] C. O'Keefe,et al. A Position Statement on Population Data Science: The Science of Data about People , 2018, International journal of population data science.
[12] Kerina H. Jones,et al. The Good, the Bad, the Clunky and . . . the Outcomes , 2018 .