Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size.

It has been found that disoriented children could use geometric information in combination with landmark information to reorient themselves in large but not in small experimental spaces. We tested domestic chicks in the same task and found that they were able to conjoin geometric and nongeometric (landmark) information to reorient themselves in both the large and the small space used. Moreover, chicks reoriented immediately when displaced from a large to a small experimental space and vice versa, suggesting that they used the relative metrics of the environment. However, when tested with a transformation (affine transformation) that alters the geometric relations between the target and the shape of the environment, chicks tended to make more errors based on geometric information when tested in the small than in the large space. These findings suggest that the reliance of the use of geometric information on the spatial scale of the environment is not restricted to the human species.

[1]  B. MacWhinney The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[2]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[3]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Searching for the center: spatial cognition in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[4]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[6]  L. Hermer-Vazquez,et al.  Language, space, and the development of cognitive flexibility in humans: the case of two spatial memory tasks , 2001, Cognition.

[7]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[8]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[9]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.

[10]  M Zanforlin,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[11]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[12]  Marc D. Hauser,et al.  The role of landmarks in cotton-top tamarin spatial foraging: evidence for geometric and non-geometric features , 2001, Animal Cognition.

[13]  E. Spelke,et al.  Human Spatial Representation: Insights from Animals , 2002 .

[14]  Edward J Golob,et al.  Differences between appetitive and aversive reinforcement on reorientation in a spatial working memory task , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[15]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Conjoining information from different modules: A comparative perspective , 2002 .

[16]  Sharon R. Doerkson,et al.  Use of Landmark Configuration in Pigeons and Humans : II . Generality Across Search Tasks , 2001 .

[17]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language , 2003 .

[18]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Searching in the center: pigeons (Columba livid) encode relative distance from walls of an enclosure. , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[19]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish , 2002, Cognition.

[20]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Animals' use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: effects of the size of the experimental space , 2005, Cognition.

[21]  P. Carruthers The cognitive functions of language , 2002, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[22]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[23]  Juan Pedro Vargas,et al.  Encoding of geometric and featural spatial information by goldfish (Carassius auratus). , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[24]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Visual Cognition and Representation in Birds and Primates , 2004 .

[25]  Peter Carruthers,et al.  Language and the development of spatial reasoning , 2005 .

[26]  C Thinus-Blanc,et al.  Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Pigeons encode relative geometry. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[28]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[29]  S. Stich,et al.  The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents , 2005 .

[30]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Young chickens learn to localize the centre of a spatial environment , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[31]  M. Shatz Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought (review) , 2006 .

[32]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Separate Geometric and Non-Geometric Modules for Spatial Reorientation: Evidence from a Lopsided Animal Brain , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[34]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Encoding of geometric and landmark information in the left and right hemispheres of the Avian Brain. , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[35]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.