Building Krylov complexity from circuit complexity

Krylov complexity has emerged as a new probe of operator growth in a wide range of non-equilibrium quantum dynamics. However, a fundamental issue remains in such studies: the definition of the distance between basis states in Krylov space is ambiguous. Here, we show that Krylov complexity can be rigorously established from circuit complexity when dynamical symmetries exist. Whereas circuit complexity characterizes the geodesic distance in a multi-dimensional operator space, Krylov complexity measures the height of the final operator in a particular direction. The geometric representation of circuit complexity thus unambiguously designates the distance between basis states in Krylov space. This geometric approach also applies to time-dependent Liouvillian superoperators, where a single Krylov complexity is no longer sufficient. Multiple Krylov complexity may be exploited jointly to fully describe operator dynamics.

[1]  H. Zhai,et al.  Krylov complexity in open quantum systems , 2022, Physical Review Research.

[2]  E. Rabinovici,et al.  Krylov complexity from integrability to chaos , 2022, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[3]  Qi Zhou,et al.  Emergent spacetimes from Hermitian and non-Hermitian quantum dynamics , 2022, 2205.07429.

[4]  Pratik Nandy,et al.  Krylov complexity in saddle-dominated scrambling , 2022, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[5]  V. Balasubramanian,et al.  Quantum chaos and the complexity of spread of states , 2022, Physical Review D.

[6]  Javier M. Magán,et al.  Geometry of Krylov complexity , 2021, Physical Review Research.

[7]  M. Smolkin,et al.  Krylov complexity in conformal field theory , 2021, Physical Review D.

[8]  E. Rabinovici,et al.  Operator complexity: a journey to the edge of Krylov space , 2020, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[9]  J. Simón,et al.  On operator growth and emergent Poincaré symmetries , 2020, 2002.03865.

[10]  K. West,et al.  Measurement of the quantum geometric tensor and of the anomalous Hall drift , 2020, Nature.

[11]  Arpan Bhattacharyya,et al.  Chaos and complexity in quantum mechanics , 2019, Physical Review D.

[12]  Hui Yan,et al.  Experimental Measurement of the Quantum Metric Tensor and Related Topological Phase Transition with a Superconducting Qubit. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[13]  Adam R. Brown,et al.  Complexity geometry of a single qubit , 2019, Physical Review D.

[14]  Bin Yan,et al.  Information Scrambling and Loschmidt Echo. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[15]  E. Altman,et al.  A Universal Operator Growth Hypothesis , 2018, Physical Review X.

[16]  X. Qi,et al.  Quantum epidemiology: operator growth, thermal effects, and SYK , 2018, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[17]  J. Eisert,et al.  Complexity and entanglement for thermofield double states , 2018, SciPost Physics.

[18]  Brian Swingle,et al.  Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time-order correlators , 2018, Nature Physics.

[19]  R. Myers,et al.  Circuit complexity for coherent states , 2018, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[20]  Javier M. Magán Black holes, complexity and quantum chaos , 2018, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[21]  Daniel A. Roberts,et al.  Operator growth in the SYK model , 2018, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[22]  M. Heyl Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review , 2017, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[23]  F. Pastawski,et al.  Toward a Definition of Complexity for Quantum Field Theory States. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[24]  R. Myers,et al.  Circuit complexity in quantum field theory , 2017, 1707.08570.

[25]  Dries Sels,et al.  Geometry and non-adiabatic response in quantum and classical systems , 2016, 1602.01062.

[26]  E. Altman Non equilibrium quantum dynamics in ultra-cold quantum gases , 2015, 1512.00870.

[27]  M. Rigol,et al.  From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics , 2015, 1509.06411.

[28]  J. Maldacena,et al.  A bound on chaos , 2015, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[29]  S. Shenker,et al.  Black holes and the butterfly effect , 2013, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[30]  M. Heyl,et al.  Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the transverse-field Ising model. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[31]  P. Hayden,et al.  Towards the fast scrambling conjecture , 2011, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[32]  Alessandro Silva,et al.  Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems , 2010, 1007.5331.

[33]  L. Susskind,et al.  Fast Scram blers , 2008, 0808.2096.

[34]  Mile Gu,et al.  Quantum Computation as Geometry , 2006, Science.

[35]  J. Maldacena The Large-N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity , 1997, hep-th/9711200.

[36]  R. Gilmore,et al.  Coherent states: Theory and some Applications , 1990 .

[37]  G. T. Trammell,et al.  Determination of the Quantum State by Measurements , 1968 .

[38]  C. Lanczos An iteration method for the solution of the eigenvalue problem of linear differential and integral operators , 1950 .

[39]  W. Hager,et al.  and s , 2019, Shallow Water Hydraulics.

[40]  Richard H. Price,et al.  Black Holes , 1997 .