Whole genome analysis of genetic alterations in small DNA samples using hyperbranched strand displacement amplification and array-CGH.

Structural genetic alterations in cancer often involve gene loss or gene amplification. With the advent of microarray approaches for the analysis of the genome, as exemplified by array-CGH (Comparative Genomic Hybridization), scanning for gene-dosage alterations is limited only by issues of DNA microarray density. However, samples of interest to the pathologist often comprise small clusters of just a few hundred cells, which do not provide sufficient DNA for array-CGH analysis. We sought to develop a simple method that would permit amplification of the whole genome without the use of thermocycling or ligation of DNA adaptors, because such a method would lend itself to the automated processing of a large number of tissue samples. We describe a method that permits the isothermal amplification of genomic DNA with high fidelity and limited sequence representation bias. The method is based on strand displacement reactions that propagate by a hyperbranching mechanism, and generate hundreds, or even thousands, of copies of the genome in a few hours. Using whole genome isothermal amplification, in combination with comparative genomic hybridization on cDNA microarrays, we demonstrate the ability to detect gene losses in yeast and gene dosage imbalances in human breast tumor cell lines. Although sequence representation bias in the amplified DNA presents potential problems for CGH analysis, these problems have been overcome by using amplified DNA in both control and tester samples. Gene-dosage alterations of threefold or more can be observed with high reproducibility with as few as 1000 cells of starting material.

[1]  J W Gray,et al.  Genetic analysis using genomic representations. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  M. Stratton,et al.  Genetic alterations in ‘normal’ luminal and myoepithelial cells of the breast , 1999, The Journal of pathology.

[3]  L. Blanco,et al.  Fidelity of phi 29 DNA polymerase. Comparison between protein-primed initiation and DNA polymerization. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[4]  S. Kingsmore,et al.  Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  Normalization for cDNA microarry data , 2001, SPIE BiOS.

[7]  C. Marosi,et al.  Interphase cytogenetics reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and intra-tumour heterogeneity in breast cancer. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  J Piper,et al.  Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  S. Mccormick,et al.  Improving degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR‐comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA copy number changes in tumors , 2000, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[10]  N. Carter,et al.  Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer. , 1992, Genomics.

[11]  M. Polymeropoulos,et al.  The human CAS (cellular apoptosis susceptibility) gene mapping on chromosome 20q13 is amplified in BT474 breast cancer cells and part of aberrant chromosomes in breast and colon cancer cell lines. , 1996, Genome research.

[12]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Image Analysis on cDNA Microarray Data , 2002 .

[13]  Michael A. Choti,et al.  A Phosphatase Associated with Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer , 2001, Science.

[14]  S. Bandoh,et al.  Expression of NOR-1 and its closely related members of the steroid/thyroid hormone receptor superfamily in human neuroblastoma cell lines. , 1995, Cancer letters.

[15]  M. Mathieu,et al.  c‐erbB‐2 (HER‐2/neu) gene amplification is a better indicator of poor prognosis than protein over‐expression in operable breast‐cancer patients , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[16]  M. Dasso,et al.  The human RAE1 gene is a functional homologue of Schizosaccharomyces pombe rae1 gene involved in nuclear export of Poly(A)+ RNA. , 1997, Gene.

[17]  D. M. Brown,et al.  Stability and structure of DNA oligonucleotides containing non-specific base analogues. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  M. Ashburner,et al.  PCR amplification of DNA microdissected from a single polytene chromosome band: a comparison with conventional microcloning. , 1989, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  W. Kuo,et al.  Quantitative mapping of amplicon structure by array CGH identifies CYP24 as a candidate oncogene , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[20]  S. Hauser,et al.  A simple method for DNA purification from peripheral blood. , 1988, Analytical biochemistry.

[21]  W. Dooley Detection of premalignant and malignant breast cells by ductal lavage , 2001 .

[22]  M. Morley,et al.  Making and reading microarrays , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[23]  D. M. Brown,et al.  5-Nitroindole as an universal base analogue. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  L. Blanco,et al.  Characterization of a 3'----5' exonuclease activity in the phage phi 29-encoded DNA polymerase. , 1985, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  I. Newsham,et al.  Allelic loss on chromosome band 18p11.3 occurs early and reveals heterogeneity in breast cancer progression , 2001, Breast Cancer Research.

[26]  V G Cheung,et al.  Whole genome amplification using a degenerate oligonucleotide primer allows hundreds of genotypes to be performed on less than one nanogram of genomic DNA. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  P. Lizardi,et al.  Mutation detection and single-molecule counting using isothermal rolling-circle amplification , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[28]  J W Gray,et al.  Cytogenetic profiling using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) , 1993, Journal of cellular biochemistry. Supplement.

[29]  I. Campbell,et al.  Loss of heterozygosity on chromosomes 7p, 7q, 9p and 11q is an early event in ovarian tumorigenesis , 1998, Oncogene.

[30]  R. Hubert,et al.  Whole genome amplification from a single cell: implications for genetic analysis. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Bernhard Horsthemke,et al.  Cloning defined regions of the human genome by microdissection of banded chromosomes and enzymatic amplification , 1989, Nature.

[32]  S. Odelberg,et al.  Template-switching during DNA synthesis by Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase I. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  M. Speicher,et al.  Comparative genomic hybridization, loss of heterozygosity, and DNA sequence analysis of single cells. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  G. Walker,et al.  Strand displacement amplification--an isothermal, in vitro DNA amplification technique. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  P. Basset,et al.  Identification of four novel human genes amplified and overexpressed in breast carcinoma and localized to the q11-q21.3 region of chromosome 17. , 1995, Genomics.

[36]  D Pinkel,et al.  High resolution deletion analysis of constitutional DNA from neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients using microarray-CGH. , 2001, Human molecular genetics.

[37]  W. Kuo,et al.  High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[38]  Michael L. Bittner,et al.  Comprehensive copy number and gene expression profiling of the 17q23 amplicon in human breast cancer , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  R. Williamson,et al.  Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridization , 1999 .

[40]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[41]  F. Dean,et al.  Rapid amplification of plasmid and phage DNA using Phi 29 DNA polymerase and multiply-primed rolling circle amplification. , 2001, Genome research.

[42]  S. Sealfon,et al.  Accuracy and calibration of commercial oligonucleotide and custom cDNA microarrays. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[43]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[44]  D. Pinkel,et al.  Comparative Genomic Hybridization for Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of Solid Tumors , 2022 .

[45]  T. Kunkel,et al.  The fidelity of DNA synthesis catalyzed by derivatives of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[46]  K. Okita,et al.  Detection of Ki-ras and p53 gene mutations in tissue and pancreatic juice from pancreatic adenocarcinomas , 1998, Journal of Gastroenterology.

[47]  A Skerra,et al.  Phosphorothioate primers improve the amplification of DNA sequences by DNA polymerases with proofreading activity. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[48]  M. Wigler,et al.  Detecting gene copy number fluctuations in tumor cells by microarray analysis of genomic representations. , 2000, Genome research.

[49]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[50]  S. Dudoit,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING DIFFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED GENES IN REPLICATED cDNA MICROARRAY EXPERIMENTS , 2002 .

[51]  H. Kong,et al.  Thermostable Bst DNA polymerase I lacks a 3'-->5' proofreading exonuclease activity. , 1996, Genetic analysis : biomolecular engineering.