Varying irrelevant phonetic features hinders learning of the feature being trained.

Learning to distinguish nonnative words that differ in a critical phonetic feature can be difficult. Speech training studies typically employ methods that explicitly direct the learner's attention to the relevant nonnative feature to be learned. However, studies on vision have demonstrated that perceptual learning may occur implicitly, by exposing learners to stimulus features, even if they are irrelevant to the task, and it has recently been suggested that this task-irrelevant perceptual learning framework also applies to speech. In this study, subjects took part in a seven-day training regimen to learn to distinguish one of two nonnative features, namely, voice onset time or lexical tone, using explicit training methods consistent with most speech training studies. Critically, half of the subjects were exposed to stimuli that varied not only in the relevant feature, but in the irrelevant feature as well. The results showed that subjects who were trained with stimuli that varied in the relevant feature and held the irrelevant feature constant achieved the best learning outcomes. Varying both features hindered learning and generalization to new stimuli.

[1]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  D. Jamieson,et al.  Training non-native speech contrasts in adults: Acquisition of the English /ð/-/θ/ contrast by francophones , 1986 .

[3]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Phonological short-term memory and foreign-language vocabulary learning☆ , 1991 .

[4]  M. Ettlinger,et al.  The bilingual advantage in phonetic learning* , 2014, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[5]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Transfer of training of a new linguistic contrast in voicing , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Implicit training of nonnative speech stimuli. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  C. Best,et al.  Nonnative and second-language speech perception : commonalities and complementarities , 2007 .

[10]  W. Strange,et al.  Effects of discrimination training on the perception of /r-l/ by Japanese adults learning English , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  A. Jongman,et al.  Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Lori L Holt,et al.  Auditory discontinuities interact with categorization: implications for speech perception. , 2004, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Kanae Nishi,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to perceive American English vowels: influence of training sets. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[15]  J. Pierrehumbert Phonetic Diversity, Statistical Learning, and Acquisition of Phonology , 2003, Language and speech.

[16]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[17]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Simultaneous and Independent Acquisition of Multisensory and Unisensory Associations , 2007, Perception.

[18]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  A. Jongman,et al.  Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  A. Bradlow 10. Training non-native language sound patterns: Lessons from training Japanese adults on the English /®/ - /l/ contrast , 2008 .

[21]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  A unified model for perceptual learning , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Dissociable Neural Effects of Long-term Stimulus–Reward Pairing in Macaque Visual Cortex , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  J. Pruitt Perceptual training on Hindi dental and retroflex consonants by native English and Japanese speakers , 1995 .

[24]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Psychophysics: Is subliminal learning really passive? , 2003, Nature.

[25]  J. Flege,et al.  Interactions between the Native and Second-language Phonetic Systems , 2001 .

[26]  J. Kingston Learning Foreign Vowels , 2003, Language and speech.

[27]  Tyler K. Perrachione,et al.  Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults , 2007, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[28]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Patrick C M Wong,et al.  Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  H. Nusbaum Talker Normalization: Phonetic Constancy as a Cognitive Process , 2011 .

[31]  Ying-Yee Kong,et al.  Temporal and spectral cues in Mandarin tone recognition , 2004 .

[32]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Auditory enhancement and second language experience in Spanish and English weighting of secondary voicing cues. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Rewards Evoke Learning of Unconsciously Processed Visual Stimuli in Adult Humans , 2009, Neuron.

[35]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  L. Lisker,et al.  A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .

[37]  F. Guenther,et al.  The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Q Summerfield,et al.  Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Two ways to listen: Do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop voicing according to language mode? , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[40]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Unattended exposure to components of speech sounds yields same benefits as explicit auditory training , 2010, Cognition.

[41]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  The phenomenon of task-irrelevant perceptual learning , 2009, Vision Research.

[42]  Mitchell S. Sommers,et al.  EFFECTS OF ACOUSTIC VARIABILITY ON SECOND LANGUAGE VOCABULARY LEARNING , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[43]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[44]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Supervised and unsupervised learning of multidimensionally varying non-native speech categories , 2008, Speech Commun..

[45]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[46]  Ron Dumont,et al.  Woodcock-Johnson III Tests Of Cognitive Abilities , 2014 .

[47]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical phonetic learning in infants: facilitation and feature generalization. , 2008, Developmental science.

[48]  Ratree Wayland,et al.  Training English and Chinese Listeners to Perceive Thai Tones: A Preliminary Report , 2004 .