Varying irrelevant phonetic features hinders learning of the feature being trained.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Pisoni,et al. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] D. Jamieson,et al. Training non-native speech contrasts in adults: Acquisition of the English /ð/-/θ/ contrast by francophones , 1986 .
[3] A. Baddeley,et al. Phonological short-term memory and foreign-language vocabulary learning☆ , 1991 .
[4] M. Ettlinger,et al. The bilingual advantage in phonetic learning* , 2014, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
[5] D. Pisoni,et al. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] D. Pisoni,et al. Transfer of training of a new linguistic contrast in voicing , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.
[7] Aaron R. Seitz,et al. Implicit training of nonnative speech stimuli. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[8] D. Pisoni,et al. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.
[9] C. Best,et al. Nonnative and second-language speech perception : commonalities and complementarities , 2007 .
[10] W. Strange,et al. Effects of discrimination training on the perception of /r-l/ by Japanese adults learning English , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.
[11] A. Jongman,et al. Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] Lori L Holt,et al. Auditory discontinuities interact with categorization: implications for speech perception. , 2004, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] H. Nusbaum,et al. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[14] Kanae Nishi,et al. Training Japanese listeners to perceive American English vowels: influence of training sets. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[15] J. Pierrehumbert. Phonetic Diversity, Statistical Learning, and Acquisition of Phonology , 2003, Language and speech.
[16] J. Werker,et al. Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .
[17] Aaron R. Seitz,et al. Simultaneous and Independent Acquisition of Multisensory and Unisensory Associations , 2007, Perception.
[18] D. Pisoni,et al. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] A. Jongman,et al. Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] A. Bradlow. 10. Training non-native language sound patterns: Lessons from training Japanese adults on the English /®/ - /l/ contrast , 2008 .
[21] Aaron R. Seitz,et al. A unified model for perceptual learning , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[22] Aaron R. Seitz,et al. Dissociable Neural Effects of Long-term Stimulus–Reward Pairing in Macaque Visual Cortex , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[23] J. Pruitt. Perceptual training on Hindi dental and retroflex consonants by native English and Japanese speakers , 1995 .
[24] Aaron R. Seitz,et al. Psychophysics: Is subliminal learning really passive? , 2003, Nature.
[25] J. Flege,et al. Interactions between the Native and Second-language Phonetic Systems , 2001 .
[26] J. Kingston. Learning Foreign Vowels , 2003, Language and speech.
[27] Tyler K. Perrachione,et al. Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults , 2007, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[28] D. Pisoni,et al. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] Patrick C M Wong,et al. Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] H. Nusbaum. Talker Normalization: Phonetic Constancy as a Cognitive Process , 2011 .
[31] Ying-Yee Kong,et al. Temporal and spectral cues in Mandarin tone recognition , 2004 .
[32] D B Pisoni,et al. Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[33] Alexander L. Francis,et al. Auditory enhancement and second language experience in Spanish and English weighting of secondary voicing cues. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] Aaron R. Seitz,et al. Rewards Evoke Learning of Unconsciously Processed Visual Stimuli in Adult Humans , 2009, Neuron.
[35] J. Mullennix,et al. Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] L. Lisker,et al. A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .
[37] F. Guenther,et al. The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] Q Summerfield,et al. Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] Catherine T. Best,et al. Two ways to listen: Do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop voicing according to language mode? , 2012, J. Phonetics.
[40] Aaron R. Seitz,et al. Unattended exposure to components of speech sounds yields same benefits as explicit auditory training , 2010, Cognition.
[41] Aaron R. Seitz,et al. The phenomenon of task-irrelevant perceptual learning , 2009, Vision Research.
[42] Mitchell S. Sommers,et al. EFFECTS OF ACOUSTIC VARIABILITY ON SECOND LANGUAGE VOCABULARY LEARNING , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
[43] K. Stevens,et al. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.
[44] Anne Cutler,et al. Supervised and unsupervised learning of multidimensionally varying non-native speech categories , 2008, Speech Commun..
[45] Paul Boersma,et al. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .
[46] Ron Dumont,et al. Woodcock-Johnson III Tests Of Cognitive Abilities , 2014 .
[47] R. Aslin,et al. Statistical phonetic learning in infants: facilitation and feature generalization. , 2008, Developmental science.
[48] Ratree Wayland,et al. Training English and Chinese Listeners to Perceive Thai Tones: A Preliminary Report , 2004 .