Spatial associations in a solitary predator: using genetic tools and GPS technology to assess cougar social organization in the Southern Yellowstone Ecosystem

We employed global positioning system (GPS) locations of 18 marked cougars and genetic material from 68 cougars in the Southern Yellowstone Ecosystem to test our current assumptions about the social organization of this non-cooperative, solitary carnivore. We tested whether variable numbers of spatial associations over 7 years of our project could be explained by increasing numbers of wolves in the system, decreasing numbers of prey, changes in cougar density, the mean genetic relatedness between interacting individuals, or the timing of the breeding season. We documented 92 spatial associations and an additional 190 incidents of spatial overlap. Our models suggested only season influenced the number of associations in any given year, and a greater frequency of associations occurred in the breeding season. Nevertheless, the proportion of associations that were male–female (M–F) remained consistent across breeding and non-breeding seasons, suggesting M–F associations may not entirely be driven by mating opportunities; alternatively, the frequency of associations may have been driven by snow depths and the distributions of cougar prey in winter. The mean r value for female–female spatial associations was 0.087 (defined as “unrelated”) and did not significantly differ from M–F or M–M associations. In conclusion, our genetic research revealed not only matrilineal lines in the Southern Yellowstone Ecosystem but also immigration by new females. Subadult males primarily emigrated out of the system, but one male remained philopatric. Our results highlighted the notion that solitary cougars are associating, and potentially interacting, on the landscape with regularity and predictability. Further, our results raised critical questions: If cougars are associating more frequently than previously believed, why do they do so and are these interactions typically agonistic?

[1]  H. Andrén,et al.  Lethal male-male interactions in Eurasian lynx , 2013 .

[2]  Charles R. Anderson,et al.  Estimating cougar predation rates from GPS location clusters , 2003 .

[3]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Mountains and Plains: The Ecology of Wyoming Landscapes , 1994 .

[4]  C. Nielsen,et al.  Effects of Joint Space Use and Group Membership on Contact Rates Among White-Tailed Deer , 2007 .

[5]  J. Jenks,et al.  Birth Timing for Mountain Lions (Puma concolor); Testing the Prey Availability Hypothesis , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  D. Queller,et al.  ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  Rebecca J. Foster,et al.  Scrape-marking behavior of jaguars (Panthera onca) and pumas (Puma concolor) , 2010 .

[8]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Life History Patterns and the Comparative Social Ecology of Carnivores , 1984 .

[9]  J F Eisenberg,et al.  Comparisons of canid and felid social systems from an evolutionary perspective. , 1973, Animal behaviour.

[10]  D. Botstein,et al.  Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. , 1980, American journal of human genetics.

[11]  H. Ernest,et al.  Development of 21 microsatellite loci for puma (Puma concolor) ecology and forensics , 2006 .

[12]  J. Newby.  Puma Dispersal Ecology in the Central Rocky Mountains , 2011 .

[13]  K. Ritland,et al.  Inferences involving individual coefficients of relatedness and inbreeding in natural populations of Abies , 2004 .

[14]  H. Quigley,et al.  Home range characteristics of a subordinate predator: selection for refugia or hunt opportunity? , 2014 .

[15]  J. A. Baker,et al.  Application of a high‐resolution animal‐borne remote video camera with global positioning for wildlife study: Observations on the secret lives of woodland caribou , 2012 .

[16]  P. Leyhausen,et al.  Cat behaviour. The predatory and social behaviour of domestic and wild cats. , 1979 .

[17]  S. Kalinowski,et al.  Do polymorphic loci require large sample sizes to estimate genetic distances? , 2005, Heredity.

[18]  Menna E. Jones,et al.  Contact networks in a wild Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) population: using social network analysis to reveal seasonal variability in social behaviour and its implications for transmission of devil facial tumour disease. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[19]  R. Sikes,et al.  Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the Use of Wild Mammals in Research , 2007 .

[20]  Alejandro Rodríguez,et al.  Field observation of two males following a female in the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) during the mating season , 2008 .

[21]  D. F. Hatler.  Mammal Tracks and Sign —A Guide to North American Species , 2006 .

[22]  J. Mellen,et al.  A comparative analysis of scent-marking, social and reproductive behavior in 20 species of small cats (Felis) , 1993 .

[23]  K. Gibson,et al.  Mammalian social learning : comparative and ecological perspectives , 1999 .

[24]  A. Rabinowitz,et al.  Cougar : ecology and conservation , 2009 .

[25]  K. Vercauteren,et al.  Efficacy of proximity loggers for detection of contacts between maternal pairs of white‐tailed deer , 2011 .

[26]  Kermit Ritland,et al.  A MARKER‐BASED METHOD FOR INFERENCES ABOUT QUANTITATIVE INHERITANCE IN NATURAL POPULATIONS , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  Nathaniel Valière.  gimlet: a computer program for analysing genetic individual identification data , 2002 .

[28]  Stuart Bearhop,et al.  Performance of Proximity Loggers in Recording Intra- and Inter-Species Interactions: A Laboratory and Field-Based Validation Study , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  K. Logan,et al.  Desert Puma: Evolutionary Ecology And Conservation Of An Enduring Carnivore , 2001 .

[30]  Observations of Wild Cougar ( Puma concolor ) Kittens with Live Prey: Implications for Learning and Survival , 2013 .

[31]  M. Whitlock,et al.  Estimating effective population size and migration rates from genetic samples over space and time. , 2003, Genetics.

[32]  J. Linnell,et al.  Interference interactions, co‐existence and conservation of mammalian carnivores , 2000 .

[33]  Brian N. Kertson,et al.  Research to regulation: Cougar social behavior as a guide for management , 2013 .

[34]  Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution , 1989 .

[35]  Bruce L. Smith.  Migratory Behavior of Hunted Elk , 2007 .

[36]  R. Bowyer,et al.  SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF MOUNTAIN LIONS: DOES A LAND-TENURE SYSTEM REGULATE POPULATION SIZE? , 2000 .

[37]  M. Lynch,et al.  Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. , 1999, Genetics.

[38]  Aaron P. Wagner,et al.  ml‐relate: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship , 2006 .

[39]  M. Culver,et al.  Spatial and temporal interactions of sympatric mountain lions in Arizona , 2011, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[40]  H. Quigley,et al.  Seasonal Foraging Ecology of Non-Migratory Cougars in a System with Migrating Prey , 2013, PloS one.

[41]  D. Rollins.  Mammal Tracks & Sign: A Guide to North American Species. Mark Elbroch. Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, USA , 2006 .

[42]  B. Thompson.  What Future Quantitative Social Science Research Could Look Like: Confidence Intervals for Effect Sizes , 2002 .

[43]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  Analyzing Animal Societies: Quantitative Methods for Vertebrate Social Analysis , 2009 .

[44]  M. Sunquist,et al.  Wild Cats of the World , 2002 .

[45]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Mountains and Plains: The Ecology of Wyoming Landscapes , 1996 .

[46]  K. Logan,et al.  Cougar Dispersal Patterns, Metapopulation Dynamics, and Conservation , 2000 .

[47]  P. White,et al.  Contact rates between possums revealed by proximity data loggers , 2005 .

[48]  M. Sandell.  The Mating Tactics and Spacing Patterns of Solitary Carnivores , 1989 .

[49]  Pierre Berthier,et al.  gemini: software for testing the effects of genotyping errors and multitubes approach for individual identification , 2002 .

[50]  Kermit Ritland,et al.  Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients , 1996 .

[51]  M. Boyce.  Migratory behavior and management of elk (Cervus elaphus) , 1991 .

[52]  G. Amato,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation and phylogeography of Neotropic pumas (Puma concolor) , 2014, Mitochondrial DNA.

[53]  P Taberlet,et al.  Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. , 1996, Nucleic acids research.

[54]  G. Forbes,et al.  Occurrence of the Maritime Shrew ( Sorex maritimensis ) in Black Spruce ( Picea mariana ) Forest Stands in Southeastern New Brunswick , 2012 .