Two ensembles are often used to model random graphs subject to constraints: the microcanonical ensemble (= hard constraint) and the canonical ensemble (= soft constraint). It is said that breaking of ensemble equivalence (BEE) occurs when the specific relative entropy of the two ensembles does not vanish as the size of the graph tends to infinity. The latter means that it matters for the scaling properties of the graph whether the constraint is met for every single realisation of the graph or only holds as an ensemble average. Various examples were analysed in the literature, and the specific relative entropy was computed as a function of the constraint. It was found that BEE is the rule rather than the exception for two classes: sparse random graphs when the number of constraints is of the order of the number of vertices and dense random graphs when there are two or more constraints that are frustrated. In the present paper we establish BEE for a third class: dense random graphs with a single constraint, namely, on the density of a given finite simple graph. We show that BEE occurs only in a certain range of choices for the density and the number of edges of the simple graph, which we refer to as the BEE-phase. We show that, in part of the BEE-phase, there is a gap between the scaling limits of the averages of the maximal eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix of the random graph under the two ensembles, a property that is referred to as spectral signature of BEE. Proofs are based on an analysis of the variational formula on the space of graphons for the limiting specific relative entropy derived in [13], in combination with an identification of the minimising graphons and replica symmetry arguments. We show that in the replica symmetric region of the BEE-phase, as the size of the graph tends to infinity, the microcanonical ensemble behaves like an Erdős-Rényi random graph, while the canonical ensemble behaves like a mixture of two Erdős-Rényi random graphs. In other words, BEE is due to coexistence of two densities. MSC2020: 05C80, 60C05, 60F10, 82B20.
[1]
V. Sós,et al.
Convergent Sequences of Dense Graphs II. Multiway Cuts and Statistical Physics
,
2012
.
[2]
F. Hollander,et al.
Ensemble equivalence for dense graphs
,
2017,
1703.08058.
[3]
F. Hollander,et al.
Ensemble nonequivalence in random graphs with modular structure
,
2016,
1603.08759.
[4]
Diego Garlaschelli,et al.
Breaking of Ensemble Equivalence in Networks.
,
2015,
Physical review letters.
[5]
E. Jaynes.
Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics
,
1957
.
[6]
G. G. Stokes.
"J."
,
1890,
The New Yale Book of Quotations.
[7]
P. Diaconis,et al.
Estimating and understanding exponential random graph models
,
2011,
1102.2650.
[8]
Bala Rajaratnam,et al.
Differential calculus on graphon space
,
2014,
J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A.
[9]
M. Mandjes,et al.
Breaking of ensemble equivalence for perturbed Erdős-Rényi random graphs
,
2018
.
[10]
Hugo Touchette,et al.
Equivalence and Nonequivalence of Ensembles: Thermodynamic, Macrostate, and Measure Levels
,
2014,
1403.6608.
[11]
D. Garlaschelli,et al.
Covariance Structure Behind Breaking of Ensemble Equivalence in Random Graphs
,
2017,
Journal of Statistical Physics.
[12]
Michel Mandjes,et al.
A spectral signature of breaking of ensemble equivalence for constrained random graphs
,
2021,
Electronic Communications in Probability.
[13]
Yufei Zhao.
Large deviations in random graphs
,
2018
.
[14]
Mei Yin,et al.
Phase transitions in exponential random graphs
,
2011,
1108.0649.
[15]
Diego Garlaschelli,et al.
Reconnecting statistical physics and combinatorics beyond ensemble equivalence
,
2017
.
[16]
Yufei Zhao,et al.
On replica symmetry of large deviations in random graphs
,
2012,
Random Struct. Algorithms.
[17]
Sourav Chatterjee,et al.
The large deviation principle for the Erdős-Rényi random graph
,
2011,
Eur. J. Comb..