Acoustic temporal modulation detection and speech perception in cochlear implant listeners.

The goals of the present study were to measure acoustic temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) in cochlear implant listeners and examine the relationship between modulation detection and speech recognition abilities. The effects of automatic gain control, presentation level and number of channels on modulation detection thresholds (MDTs) were examined using the listeners' clinical sound processor. The general form of the TMTF was low-pass, consistent with previous studies. The operation of automatic gain control had no effect on MDTs when the stimuli were presented at 65 dBA. MDTs were not dependent on the presentation levels (ranging from 50 to 75 dBA) nor on the number of channels. Significant correlations were found between MDTs and speech recognition scores. The rates of decay of the TMTFs were predictive of speech recognition abilities. Spectral-ripple discrimination was evaluated to examine the relationship between temporal and spectral envelope sensitivities. No correlations were found between the two measures, and 56% of the variance in speech recognition was predicted jointly by the two tasks. The present study suggests that temporal modulation detection measured with the sound processor can serve as a useful measure of the ability of clinical sound processing strategies to deliver clinically pertinent temporal information.

[1]  J H Grose,et al.  Development of temporal resolution in children as measured by the temporal modulation transfer function. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Anthony J Spahr,et al.  Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. , 1962, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[4]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection in listeners with cochlear implants. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Monita Chatterjee,et al.  Across- and Within-Channel Envelope Interactions in Cochlear Implant Listeners , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[6]  Q. Fu Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users , 2002, Neuroreport.

[7]  R. Shannon Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[9]  R. Shannon,et al.  Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Monita Chatterjee,et al.  Modulation masking in cochlear implant listeners: envelope versus tonotopic components. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Belinda A Henry,et al.  Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Anthony J Spahr,et al.  Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Colette M McKay,et al.  The upper limit of temporal pitch for cochlear-implant listeners: stimulus duration, conditioner pulses, and the number of electrodes stimulated. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  J. Rubinstein,et al.  Psychoacoustic Abilities Associated With Music Perception in Cochlear Implant Users , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[18]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  G M Clark,et al.  The perception of temporal modulations by cochlear implant patients. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  M Pelizzone,et al.  Low-pass filtering in amplitude modulation detection associated with vowel and consonant identification in subjects with cochlear implants. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  J. Galvin,et al.  Influence of stimulation rate and loudness growth on modulation detection and intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users , 2009, Hearing Research.

[22]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  N. Viemeister Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  G M Clark,et al.  Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant subjects. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  Effects of Stimulation Rate, Mode and Level on Modulation Detection by Cochlear Implant Users , 2005, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[26]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Intensity discrimination and detection of amplitude modulation in electric hearing. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  B C Moore,et al.  Optimization of a slow-acting automatic gain control system for use in hearing aids. , 1991, British journal of audiology.

[28]  J H Grose,et al.  Temporal analysis in children. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[29]  Robert V. Shannon,et al.  Importance of tonal envelope cues in Chinese speech recognition , 1995 .

[30]  Jian Yu,et al.  A relation between electrode discrimination and amplitude modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Belinda A Henry,et al.  The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Spectral-Ripple Resolution Correlates with Speech Reception in Noise in Cochlear Implant Users , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[33]  Colette M. McKay,et al.  Amplitude Modulation and Loudness in Cochlear Implantees , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[34]  C. McKay,et al.  The effect of rate of stimulation on perception of spectral shape by cochlear implantees. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  F. Zeng,et al.  Identification of temporal envelope cues in Chinese tone recognition , 2000 .

[36]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Xin Luo,et al.  Effects of stimulus duration on amplitude modulation processing with cochlear implants. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  David A. Eddins,et al.  Amplitude modulation detection of narrow‐band noise: Effects of absolute bandwidth and frequency region , 1993 .

[39]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Psychophysical Performance and Mandarin Tone Recognition in Noise by Cochlear Implant Users , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[40]  J. Galvin,et al.  The Role of Spectral and Temporal Cues in Voice Gender Discrimination by Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[41]  Xin Luo,et al.  Speech Recognition and Temporal Amplitude Modulation Processing by Mandarin-Speaking Cochlear Implant Users , 2008, Ear and hearing.