Participation under a spell of instrumentalization? Reflections on action research in an entrenched climate adaptation policy process

The article discusses action research in a Dutch intergovernmental project group DV2050. That group was to assess the effects of climate change and soil subsidence on the regional water system and to propose adaptive policies to increase regional water safety. In this study, we draw a parallel between the stakeholder participation trajectory of DV2050 and our collaborative learning trajectory within the DV2050 project. In the academic literature, both participatory policy-making and action research are advocated for instrumental, normative and quality reasons. In our case, both trajectories took place in an entrenched context, i.e. a strongly institutionalized environment in which the involved governments compete for competencies. Despite broader ambitions stated at the beginning of these trajectories, we explain that both became instrumentalized by actors involved, narrowing their scope. Instrumentalization was influenced by powerful interests, a strongly institutionalized science–policy interface and the pressure of imminent decision-making.

[1]  M. Reed Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[2]  D. Dennis,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1998 .

[3]  Matteo Villa,et al.  In the shadow of legalism: understanding community participation in an overly bureaucratic context , 2014 .

[4]  Liz Sharp,et al.  Developing adaptive capacity through reflexivity: lessons from collaborative research with a UK water utility , 2014 .

[5]  C. Ansell,et al.  Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[6]  Brian Wynne,et al.  The rhetoric of consensus politics: a critical review of technology assessment , 1993 .

[7]  H. Wagenaar,et al.  Meaning in action : interpretation and dialogue in policy analysis , 2011 .

[8]  Arthur C. Petersen,et al.  Stakeholder participation in environmental knowledge production , 2010 .

[9]  J. Wittmayer,et al.  Symposium introduction: usable knowledge in practice. What action research has to offer to critical policy studies , 2014 .

[10]  Steve Rayner,et al.  Democracy in the age of assessment: Reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public-sector decision making , 2003 .

[11]  James C. Scott,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1999 .

[12]  Raoul Beunen,et al.  Delineating Locals: Transformations of Knowledge/Power and the Governance of the Danube Delta , 2011 .

[13]  Victor J. Friedman,et al.  There is nothing so theoretical as good action research , 2009 .

[14]  J. Edelenbos,et al.  Democratic Legitimacy of New Forms of Water Management in the Netherlands , 2012 .

[15]  P. Leroy,et al.  The Dutch Delta Committee as a boundary organisation , 2013 .

[16]  E. Millstone Science, risk and governance: Radical rhetorics and the realities of reform in food safety governance , 2009 .

[17]  A. Stirling “Opening Up” and “Closing Down” , 2008 .

[18]  C. Argyris Reasons and rationalizations : the limits to organizational knowledge , 2004 .

[19]  S. Reinhard,et al.  The Institutional Evolution of the Dutch Water Board Model , 2009 .

[20]  Steve Rayner,et al.  The rise of risk and the decline of politics , 2007 .

[21]  Jacob Torfing,et al.  Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector , 2011 .

[22]  D. Liefferink,et al.  The marathon of the hare and the tortoise: implementing the EU Water Framework Directive , 2013 .

[23]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Participatory Action Research and Action Science Compared , 1989 .

[24]  M. Pimbert,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Action Research , 2008 .

[25]  J. Warner More Sustainable Participation? Multi-Stakeholder Platforms for Integrated Catchment Management , 2006 .

[26]  J. Chilvers Reflexive Engagement? Actors, Learning, and Reflexivity in Public Dialogue on Science and Technology , 2013 .

[27]  L. Phillips Analysing the dialogic turn in the communication of research-based knowledge: An exploration of the tensions in collaborative research , 2011 .

[28]  T. Cain The Sage handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice , 2014 .

[29]  J. Edelenbos,et al.  Managing Stakeholder Involvement in Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Six Interactive Processes in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[30]  W. Halffman Measuring the Stakes: The Dutch Planning Bureaus , 2009 .

[31]  D. Yanow,et al.  Interpretation and Method : Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn , 2006 .

[32]  C. Koliba,et al.  Inquiry as Intervention , 2007 .

[33]  R. Hoppe,et al.  Institutional constraints and practical problems in deliberative and participatory policy making , 2011 .