The Feasibility of Folk Science

If folk science means individuals having well worked out mechanistic theories of the workings of the world, then it is not feasible. Lay people's explanatory understandings are remarkably coarse, full of gaps and often full of inconsistencies. Even worse, most people underestimate their own understandings. Yet, recent views suggest that formal scientists may not be so different. In spite of these limitations, science somehow works and its success offers hope for the feasibility of folk science as well. The success of science arises from the ways in which scientists learn to leverage understandings in other minds and to outsource explanatory work through sophisticated methods of deference and simplification of complex systems. Three studies ask whether analogous processes might be present not only in lay people, but also in young children and thereby form a foundation for supplementing explanatory understandings almost from the start of our first attempts to make sense of the world.

[1]  Andrew Shtulman,et al.  Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  P. Harris The Cognitive Basis of Science: What do children learn from testimony? , 2002 .

[3]  M. Braine On the Relation Between the Natural Logic of Reasoning and Standard Logic. , 1978 .

[4]  D. Dawda,et al.  AND COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT , 2006 .

[5]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[6]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Learning Modeling Abstractions via Generalization , 2008 .

[7]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Why the Child's Theory of Mind Really Is a Theory , 1992 .

[8]  B. Malle,et al.  Actor-observer asymmetries in explanations of behavior: new answers to an old question. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Frank C. Keil,et al.  Children’s developing notions of (im)partiality , 2008, Cognition.

[10]  Paul A. Boghossian,et al.  Fear of knowledge , 2006 .

[11]  Lawrence A. Hirschfeld,et al.  Why Don't Anthropologists Like Children? , 2002 .

[12]  誼余夫 波多野,et al.  Young children's naive thinking about the biological world , 2002 .

[13]  Frank C Keil,et al.  Where is the essence? Developmental shifts in children's beliefs about internal features. , 2008, Child development.

[14]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1959 .

[15]  D. Medin,et al.  Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  S. Denison,et al.  Statistical inference and sensitivity to sampling in 11-month-old infants , 2009, Cognition.

[17]  A. Grafstein MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences , 2000 .

[18]  S. Carey,et al.  Knowing who dunnit: Infants identify the causal agent in an unseen causal interaction. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[19]  E. Spelke,et al.  Science and Core Knowledge , 1996, Philosophy of Science.

[20]  Alvin I. Goldman,et al.  Pathways to Knowledge: Private and Public , 2002 .

[21]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Naive beliefs in “sophisticated” subjects: misconceptions about trajectories of objects , 1981, Cognition.

[22]  L. Schulz,et al.  Serious fun: preschoolers engage in more exploratory play when evidence is confounded. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[23]  Noretta Koertge,et al.  A house built on sand : exposing postmodernist myths about science , 1998 .

[24]  Gail D Heyman,et al.  Children's reasoning about physics within and across ontological kinds , 2003, Cognition.

[25]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[26]  Joe Cain,et al.  Progress and its problems , 1999 .

[27]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Learning words from knowledgeable versus ignorant speakers: links between preschoolers' theory of mind and semantic development. , 2001, Child development.

[28]  S. Carey The Origin of Concepts , 2000 .

[29]  J. Hampton Similarity-based categorization and fuzziness of natural categories , 1998, Cognition.

[30]  R. Siegler Three aspects of cognitive development , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  T. Kuhn The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[32]  Grant Malcolm Multidisciplinary Approaches to Visual Representations and Interpretations , 2004 .

[33]  P. Harris,et al.  Going With the Flow , 2009, Psychological science.

[34]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  Language and the ability to evaluate contradictions and tautologies , 1975, Cognition.

[35]  Susan A. Gelman,et al.  Bewitchment, Biology, or Both: The Co-Existence of Natural and Supernatural Explanatory Frameworks Across Development , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  Pierre Clément,et al.  Portuguese primary school children's conceptions about digestion: identification of learning obstacles , 2004 .

[37]  J. D. Trout Scientific Explanation And The Sense Of Understanding* , 2002, Philosophy of Science.

[38]  S. Psillos Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth , 1999 .

[39]  Frank C. Keil,et al.  An abstract to concrete shift in the development of biological thought: the insides story , 1995, Cognition.

[40]  S. Vosniadou On the Nature of Naïve Physics , 2002 .

[41]  Charles E. Caton,et al.  Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective , 1982 .

[42]  Keith A. Markus,et al.  Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation , 2007 .

[43]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Thomas Kuhn: Kuhn, Conceptual Change, and Cognitive Science , 2002 .

[44]  A. Glenberg,et al.  The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension , 1982 .

[45]  Andrew S. Glassner,et al.  Circular Reasoning , 1998, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[46]  S. Carey,et al.  On differentiation: A case study of the development of the concepts of size, weight, and density , 1985, Cognition.

[47]  J. Wilson Science, Truth, and Democracy , 2002 .

[48]  M. Bertaminia,et al.  The representation of naïve knowledge about physics , 2005 .

[49]  T. K. Au Developing An Intuitive Understanding of Substance Kinds , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  W. Schneider The Development of Metacognitive Knowledge in Children and Adolescents: Major Trends and Implications for Education , 2008 .

[51]  T. Kindt Circular reasoning , 1988, Nature.

[52]  H. Wellman,et al.  Evidence for an explanation advantage in naïve biological reasoning , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[53]  C. K. Ogden,et al.  The Meaning of Meaning , 1923 .

[54]  J. Knobe,et al.  Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions , 2007 .

[55]  B. Bower A Child's Theory of Mind , 1993 .

[56]  M Taylor,et al.  Children's understanding of knowledge acquisition: the tendency for children to report that they have always known what they have just learned. , 1994, Child development.

[57]  S. Carey Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .

[58]  David M. Sobel,et al.  Detecting blickets: how young children use information about novel causal powers in categorization and induction. , 2000, Child development.

[59]  S. P. Schwartz Naming, necessity, and natural kinds , 1977 .

[60]  A. diSessa Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[61]  Corinne Zimmerman The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills in Elementary and Middle School. , 2007 .

[62]  D. Medin,et al.  Context and structure in conceptual combination , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[63]  Jan J Koenderink Levels of Explanation , 2002, Perception.

[64]  A. Roskies Neuroimaging and Inferential Distance , 2008 .

[65]  M. Bradley,et al.  Coactivation and comprehension: Contribution of text variables to the illusion of knowing , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[66]  Andrew Shtulman,et al.  The Relation Between Essentialist Beliefs and Evolutionary Reasoning , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[67]  Philip Kitcher A Plea for Science Studies Philip Kitcher , 1998 .

[68]  D. Kuhn The development of causal reasoning. , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[69]  E. Machery,et al.  Causation , Physics , and the Constitution of Reality : Russell ’ s Republic Revisited , 2022 .

[70]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Creating Scientific Concepts , 2008 .

[71]  D. Medin,et al.  The native mind and the cultural construction of nature. , 2008 .

[72]  A. Roskies Are Neuroimages Like Photographs of the Brain? , 2007, Philosophy of Science.

[73]  Michael Weisberg Three Kinds of Idealization , 2007 .

[74]  A. Leslie Mapping the mind: ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity , 1994 .

[75]  Amy M. Masnick,et al.  The Development of Causal Reasoning , 2007 .

[76]  M H NAGY,et al.  Children's conceptions of some bodily functions. , 1953, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[77]  F. Keil Folkscience: coarse interpretations of a complex reality , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[78]  P. Harris,et al.  Choosing your informant: weighing familiarity and recent accuracy. , 2009, Developmental science.

[79]  Laurie R Santos,et al.  Endowment effect in capuchin monkeys , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[80]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[81]  L S Geiss,et al.  Impact of diabetes mellitus on mortality associated with pneumonia and influenza among non-Hispanic black and white US adults. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[82]  Jordan B. Peterson The Meaning of Meaning , 2007 .

[83]  Paul Bloom,et al.  The Curse of Knowledge in Reasoning About False Beliefs , 2007, Psychological science.

[84]  B. Malt Features and beliefs in th e mental representation s of categories , 1990 .

[85]  Hange,et al.  Science Education as Conceptual Change , 2000 .

[86]  Leonid Rozenblit,et al.  The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[87]  Huw Price,et al.  Causation, physics, and the constitution of reality : Russell's republic revisited , 2006 .

[88]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[89]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[90]  P. Boghossian Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism , 2006 .

[91]  B. H. Pillow,et al.  There's more to the picture than meets the eye: young children's difficulty understanding biased interpretation. , 1996, Child development.

[92]  K. Dunbar,et al.  The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: the case of analogy , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[93]  V. Sloutsky,et al.  Understanding of logical necessity: developmental antecedents and cognitive consequences. , 1998, Child development.

[94]  S. Gelman,et al.  The Essential Child : Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought , 2003 .

[95]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Relations, Objects, and the Composition of Analogies , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[96]  C. Hempel,et al.  Studies in the Logic of Explanation , 1948, Philosophy of Science.

[97]  David M. Sobel,et al.  A theory of causal learning in children: causal maps and Bayes nets. , 2004, Psychological review.

[98]  Alvin I. Goldman,et al.  Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust? , 2001 .

[99]  Steve Fuller,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 2002 .

[100]  F. Keil,et al.  Two dogmas of conceptual empiricism: implications for hybrid models of the structure of knowledge , 1998, Cognition.

[101]  Frank C Keil,et al.  Early understanding of the division of cognitive labor. , 2002, Child development.

[102]  K. Dunbar HOW SCIENTISTS REALLY REASON: SCIENTIFIC REASONING IN REAL-WORLD LABORATORIES , 1995 .

[103]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  The Importance of Learning About Knowing: Creating a Foundation for Development of Intellectual Values , 2009 .

[104]  Eddy Nahmias,et al.  Free will, moral responsibility, and mechanism : Experiments on folk intuitions , 2007 .

[105]  Adam Elga,et al.  Isolation and folk physics , 2005 .

[106]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[107]  R. Hilborn Sea gulls, butterflies, and grasshoppers: A brief history of the butterfly effect in nonlinear dynamics , 2004 .

[108]  Michael Siegal,et al.  Culture and children's cosmology. , 2004, Developmental science.

[109]  David Klahr,et al.  Error Matters: An Initial Exploration of Elementary School Children's Understanding of Experimental Error , 2003 .

[110]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Conceptual coherence in the child's theory of mind: training children to understand belief. , 1996, Child development.

[111]  Brenda R. J. Jansen,et al.  Children's knowledge of the earth: a new methodological and statistical approach. , 2008, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[112]  Giyoo Hatano,et al.  Vitalistic causality in young children's naive biology , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[113]  W. Friedman The Developmental psychology of time , 1982 .

[114]  Francimar Martins Teixeira What happens to the food we eat? Children's conceptions of the structure and function of the digestive system , 2000 .

[115]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Secret Agents , 2005, Psychological science.

[116]  Leonid Rozenblit,et al.  Discerning the Division of Cognitive Labor: An Emerging Understanding of How Knowledge Is Clustered in Other Minds , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[117]  F. Keil Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development , 1989 .

[118]  David M. Sobel,et al.  The Blicket Within: Preschoolers' Inferences About Insides and Causes , 2007, Journal of cognition and development : official journal of the Cognitive Development Society.

[119]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Domain-specific knowledge in human children and non-human primates: Artifact and food kinds , 2002 .

[120]  Ori Friedman,et al.  Core mechanisms in ‘theory of mind’ , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[121]  L. Schulz,et al.  Stretching to Learn : Ambiguous Evidence and Variability in Preschoolers ’ Exploratory Play , 2008 .

[122]  A. Relman,et al.  The Role of Trust in Knowledge , 2007 .

[123]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  How Do Engineering Scientists Think? Model-Based Simulation in Biomedical Engineering Research Laboratories , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[124]  Frank C. Keil,et al.  The Shadows and Shallows of Explanation , 1998, Minds and Machines.

[125]  Rebecca Lawson,et al.  The science of cycology: Failures to understand how everyday objects work , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[126]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[127]  Frank C. Keil,et al.  The Development of Cynicism , 2005, Psychological science.

[128]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Hybrid analogies in conceptual innovation in science , 2009, Cognitive Systems Research.

[129]  H. Wellman,et al.  Knowledge acquisition in foundational domains. , 1998 .

[130]  S. Gelman Learning from others: children's construction of concepts. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[131]  Deena Skolnick Weisberg,et al.  The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[132]  S. Psillos Knowing the Structure of Nature , 2009 .

[133]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Young Children Infer Causal Strength From Probabilities and Interventions , 2005, Psychological science.

[134]  Susan Carey,et al.  Conceptual Differences Between Children and Adults , 1988 .

[135]  H. Wellman,et al.  Cognitive development: foundational theories of core domains. , 1992, Annual review of psychology.

[136]  D. Kuhn Metacognitive Development , 2000 .

[137]  Jennifer B. Esterly,et al.  Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force , 2004 .

[138]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[139]  S. Gelman,et al.  Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity In Cognition And Culture , 1994 .

[140]  Anjan Chakravartty,et al.  The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science , 2000 .

[141]  Susan Carey,et al.  On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge , 1993 .

[142]  M. Strevens Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation , 2008 .

[143]  S. Carroll Evo-Devo and an Expanding Evolutionary Synthesis: A Genetic Theory of Morphological Evolution , 2008, Cell.