Improvement in the Recovery Accuracy of the Lunar Gravity Field Based on the Future Moon-ILRS Spacecraft Gravity Mission

This study mostly concentrates on the sensitivity analysis regarding the future dedicated Moon-ILRS spacecraft gravity mission. Firstly, the new single and combined analytical error models for the cumulative lunar geoid height impacted by the major error sources comprising the inter-spacecraft range-rate of the interferometric laser ranging system (ILRS), the spacecraft orbital position tracked by the deep space network (DSN) and the non-conservative force of the drag-free control system (DFCS) are developed on the basis of the spacecraft-to-spacecraft tracking in the low–low mode (SST-LL) from the future twin Moon-ILRS spacecraft. Secondly, the correctness of the new single and combined analytical error models is proved according to the compliance of the cumulative lunar geoid height errors among the inter-spacecraft range-rate, orbital position and non-conservative force. Finally, in comparison with the past gravity recovery and interior laboratory (GRAIL) program, the preferred design for the future Moon-ILRS mission is achieved in this paper. We recommend that the future twin Moon-ILRS formation-flying spacecraft had better adopt the new-type space-borne instruments involving the ILRS and DFCS. We demonstrate the compatible accuracy indexes of the key sensors (e.g., 10−9 m/s in the inter-spacecraft range-rate, 1 m in the orbital position and 3 × 10−13 m/s2 in the non-conservative force) and the optimal orbital parameters (e.g., 25-km orbital altitude, 100-km inter-spacecraft range and 1-s sampling interval) in the future Moon-ILRS twin-spacecraft mission.

[1]  Stacia M. Long,et al.  Trans-Lunar Cruise Trajectory Design of GRAIL (Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory) Mission , 2010 .

[2]  Sami W. Asmar,et al.  High‐resolution lunar gravity fields from the GRAIL Primary and Extended Missions , 2014 .

[3]  Yuan Meijuan Progress in international lunar exploration programs , 2012 .

[4]  David E. Smith,et al.  Gravity Field of the Moon from the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) Mission , 2013, Science.

[5]  M. Watkins,et al.  GRACE Measurements of Mass Variability in the Earth System , 2004, Science.

[6]  M. Zhong,et al.  China's first-phase Mars Exploration Program: Yinghuo-1 orbiter , 2013 .

[7]  M. Zhong,et al.  Efficient accuracy improvement of GRACE global gravitational field recovery using a new Inter-satellite Range Interpolation Method , 2012 .

[8]  David E. Smith,et al.  High‒degree gravity models from GRAIL primary mission data , 2013 .

[9]  Scott B. Luthcke,et al.  Simulation study of a follow-on gravity mission to GRACE , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[10]  David E. Smith,et al.  Lunar interior properties from the GRAIL mission , 2014 .

[11]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  A Comparison of Global and Regional GRACE Models for Land Hydrology , 2008 .

[12]  Yun Mei-Juan,et al.  Accurate and rapid error estimation on global gravitational field from current GRACE and future GRACE Follow-On missions , 2009 .

[13]  R. Roncoli,et al.  Mission Design Overview for the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) Mission , 2010 .

[14]  Sami W. Asmar,et al.  The Crust of the Moon as Seen by GRAIL , 2012, Science.

[15]  Rabi T. Wang,et al.  The Lunar Gravity Ranging System for the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) Mission , 2013 .

[16]  Tom L. Hoffman,et al.  GRAIL: Gravity mapping the moon , 2009, 2009 IEEE Aerospace conference.

[17]  Yun Mei-Juan,et al.  Precise and Rapid Recovery of the Earth's Gravity Field from the Next-Generation GRACE Follow-On Mission using the Residual Intersatellite Range-Rate Method , 2014 .

[18]  W. M. Kaula Theory of satellite geodesy , 1966 .

[19]  David E. Smith,et al.  Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL): Extended Mission and End-Game Status , 2013 .

[20]  David E. Smith,et al.  The Scientific Measurement System of the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) Mission , 2013 .

[21]  David E. Smith,et al.  GRGM900C: A degree 900 lunar gravity model from GRAIL primary and extended mission data , 2014, Geophysical research letters.

[22]  M. Zhong,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Key Payloads and Orbital Parameters from the Next-Generation Moon-Gradiometer Satellite Gravity Program , 2014, Surveys in Geophysics.

[23]  David E. Smith,et al.  Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL): Mapping the Lunar Interior from Crust to Core , 2013, Space Science Reviews.

[24]  T. Mayer-Gürr,et al.  GRAIL gravity field recovery based on the short-arc integral equation technique: Simulation studies and first real data results , 2014 .

[25]  F. Frappart,et al.  Constrained Regional Recovery of Continental Water Mass Time-variations from GRACE-based Geopotential Anomalies over South America , 2010, Surveys in Geophysics.

[26]  David E. Smith,et al.  The JPL lunar gravity field to spherical harmonic degree 660 from the GRAIL Primary Mission , 2013 .

[27]  Wei Zheng,et al.  Precise Recovery of the Earth's Gravitational Field With GRACE: Intersatellite Range-Rate Interpolation Approach , 2012, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[28]  Precise Recovery of the Earth's Gravitational Field by Grace Follow‐On Satellite Gravity Gradiometry Method , 2014 .

[29]  Min Zhong,et al.  Requirements Analysis for Future Satellite Gravity Mission Improved-GRACE , 2014, Surveys in Geophysics.

[30]  David E. Smith,et al.  Ancient Igneous Intrusions and Early Expansion of the Moon Revealed by GRAIL Gravity Gradiometry , 2013, Science.

[31]  Sami W. Asmar,et al.  Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory Simulations of Static and Temporal Gravity Field , 2012 .

[32]  Karsten Danzmann,et al.  Intersatellite laser ranging instrument for the GRACE follow-on mission , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[33]  M. Wattenbach,et al.  Comparison of Daily GRACE Gravity Field and Numerical Water Storage Models for De-aliasing of Satellite Gravimetry Observations , 2014, Surveys in Geophysics.