Size, Performance and Effectiveness: Cost-Constrained Measures of Best-Practice Performance and Secondary-School Size

Current education policy in the UK requires secondary schools to strive for 'effectiveness' or 'best-practice' performance in producing educational outcomes, while securing cost efficiency in input use when doing so. Given this double policy objective, the present study uses data envelopment analysis to generate performance scores for schools relative to cost-constrained best-practice benchmarks that simultaneously take account of both outcome effectiveness and cost efficiency. The empirical results, relating to the set of Northern Ireland secondary schools, indicate that a positive relationship between effectiveness-efficiency performance scores and secondary school size holds across a range of educational outcomes. Larger schools were still found to outperform smaller ones, on average, when schools were grouped according to gender, school type, and absence/presence of a sixth form. The findings imply that it is inappropriate to assess the performance of schools without taking into account the impact of school size on such performance.

[1]  D. McVicar Are Secondary Schools In Northern Ireland Too Small? A Microeconomic Analysis Of School Size And Career Choice At Sixteen , 2000 .

[2]  David M Armstrong School Performance and Staying on: A Micro Analysis for Northern Ireland , 1999 .

[3]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: The State of the Art , 1999 .

[4]  Steve Bradley,et al.  The effect of school size on the exam performance of secondary schools , 1998 .

[5]  Martyn J. Andrews,et al.  Modelling the Transition from School and the Demand for Training in the United Kingdom , 1997 .

[6]  James Symons,et al.  Attainment in Secondary School , 1997 .

[7]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Comparing mean efficiency and productivity scores from small samples: A bootstrap methodology , 1995 .

[8]  Paul W. Wilson,et al.  Detecting influential observations in data envelopment analysis , 1995 .

[9]  S. J. Prais,et al.  Productivity, education, and training : an international perspective , 1995 .

[10]  Hans Bonesrønning,et al.  Efficiency variation among the Norwegian High Schools: Consequences of equalization policy , 1994 .

[11]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[12]  A. Mcpherson,et al.  Measuring Added Value in Schools. , 1993 .

[13]  Eric A. Hanushek,et al.  The Trade-off between Child Quantity and Quality , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  J. Gray,et al.  Estimating Differences in the Examination Performances of Secondary Schools in Six LEAs: A Multi-level Approach to School Effectiveness. , 1990 .

[15]  Robert M. Thrall,et al.  Classification transitions under expansion of inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis , 1989 .

[16]  H. Goldstein,et al.  Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research. , 1988 .

[17]  Rolf Färe,et al.  AN INDIRECT APPROACH TO THE EVALUATION OF PRODUCER PERFORMANCE , 1988 .

[18]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  Educational Performance Indicators and LEA League Tables , 1988 .

[19]  David Mayston,et al.  Performance Assessment in the Education Sector: educational and economic perspectives , 1987 .

[20]  M. Aitkin,et al.  Statistical Modelling Issues in School Effectiveness Studies , 1986 .

[21]  E. Hanushek Conceptual and Empirical Issues in the Estimation of Educational Production Functions , 1979 .