Confusing one person with another: what errors reveal about the elementary forms of social relations.

Seven studies investigated the cognitive structure of social relationships exhibited in the patterns of substitutions that occur when people confuse a person with another. The studies investigated natural errors in which people called a familiar person by the wrong name, misremembered with whom they had interacted, or mistakenly directed an action at an inappropriate person. These studies tested the relational-models theory of A. P. Fiske (1990b, 1991) that people use 4 basic models for social relationships. All 7 studies provide support for the theory; Ss tend to confuse people with whom they interact in the same basic relationship mode. In addition, Ss confuse people of the same gender. Other factors (age, race, role term, similarity of names) generally have smaller, less reliable effects, indicating that the 4 elementary modes of relationships are among the most salient schemata in everyday social cognition.

[1]  S. G. Nooteboom,et al.  Speaking and unspeaking : detection and correction of phonological and lexical errors in spontaneous speech , 1980 .

[2]  J. Reason,et al.  Absent-mindedness in shops: its incidence, correlates and consequences. , 1984, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[3]  M. Clark,et al.  Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. , 1979 .

[4]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation , 1990 .

[5]  A. Cutler.  Slips of the Tongue and Language Production , 1982 .

[6]  M. Deutsch,et al.  Perceived dimensions of interpersonal relations. , 1976 .

[7]  U. Foa,et al.  Convergences in the analysis of the structure of interpersonal behavior. , 1961, Psychological review.

[8]  James D. Laing,et al.  Prediction Analysis of Cross Classifications. , 1976 .

[9]  L. Arcuri.  Three patterns of social categorization in attribution memory , 1982 .

[10]  M. Clark,et al.  Communications that Should Lead to Perceived Exploitation in Communal and Exchange Relationships , 1986 .

[11]  M. Clark.  Record keeping in two types of relationships. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[13]  W. G. Cochran.  The comparison of percentages in matched samples. , 1950, Biometrika.

[14]  C. F. Bond,et al.  On the unconstrained recall of acquaintances: A sampling-traversal model. , 1985 .

[15]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Review of personality and social psychology , 1980 .

[16]  D. Norman.  Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[17]  Carol T. Miller.  Categorization and the Physical Attractiveness Stereotype , 1988 .

[18]  G. White.  Conceptual Universale in Interpersonal Language , 1980 .

[19]  E. Foa,et al.  Societal Structures of the Mind , 1974 .

[20]  H. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Self-ingroup Relationships We Wish to Thank Our Research Collaborators for Stimulating Ideas, Data, and Moral Support in Carrying out a Complex Set of Studies. They , 2022 .

[21]  R. H. Willis,et al.  Social Exchange: Advances In Theory And Research , 1981 .

[22]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Traits and social stereotypes: Levels of categorization in person perception. , 1987 .

[23]  A. Fiske.  The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations. , 1992, Psychological review.

[24]  A. Fiske.  The cultural relativity of selfish individualism: Anthropological evidence that humans are inherently sociable. , 1991 .

[25]  V. Fromkin.  Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue , 1982 .

[26]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. , 1978 .

[27]  C. F. Bond,et al.  A social context-personality index theory of memory for acquaintances. , 1987 .