Influence of Agonists and Antagonists on the Segmental Motion of Residues near the Agonist Binding Pocket of the Acetylcholine-binding Protein*

Using the Lymnaea acetylcholine-binding protein as a surrogate of the extracellular domain of the nicotinic receptor, we combined site-directed labeling with fluorescence spectroscopy to assess possible linkages between ligand binding and conformational dynamics. Specifically, 2-[(5-fluoresceinyl)aminocarbonyl]ethyl methanethiosulfonate was conjugated to a free cysteine on loop C and to five substituted cysteines at strategic locations in the subunit sequence, and the backbone flexibility around each site of conjugation was measured with time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy. The sites examined were in loop C (Cys-188 using a C187S mutant), in the β9 strand (T177C), in the β10 strand (D194C), in the β8-β9 loop (N158C and Y164C), and in the β7 strand (K139C). Conjugated fluorophores at these locations show distinctive anisotropy decay patterns indicating different degrees of segmental fluctuations near the agonist binding pocket. Ligand occupation and decay of anisotropy were assessed for one agonist (epibatidine) and two antagonists (α-bungarotoxin and d-tubocurarine). The Y164C and Cys-188 conjugates were also investigated with additional agonists (nicotine and carbamylcholine), partial agonists (lobeline and 4-hydroxy,2-methoxy-benzylidene anabaseine), and an antagonist (methyllycaconitine). With the exception of the T177C conjugate, both agonists and antagonists perturbed the backbone flexibility of each site; however, agonist-selective changes were only observed at Y164C in loop F where the agonists and partial agonists increased the range and/or rate of the fast anisotropy decay processes. The results reveal that agonists and antagonists produced distinctive changes in the flexibility of a portion of loop F.

[1]  A. J. Thompson,et al.  Mutagenesis and Molecular Modeling Reveal the Importance of the 5-HT3 Receptor F-loop* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  R. Papke,et al.  Analysis of 3-(4-hydroxy, 2-Methoxybenzylidene)anabaseine selectivity and activity at human and rat alpha-7 nicotinic receptors. , 1998, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[3]  H. Lester,et al.  Five ADNFLE Mutations Reduce the Ca2+ Dependence of the Mammalian α4β2 Acetylcholine Response , 2003 .

[4]  Elizabeth A Komives,et al.  Ligand-induced Conformational Changes in the Acetylcholine-binding Protein Analyzed by Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  N. Unwin,et al.  Refined structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor at 4A resolution. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  Jason Deich,et al.  Consequences of cAMP and catalytic-subunit binding on the flexibility of the A-kinase regulatory subunit. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[7]  Y. Fujiyoshi,et al.  Activation of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor involves a switch in conformation of the alpha subunits. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  P. Taylor,et al.  Structures of Aplysia AChBP complexes with nicotinic agonists and antagonists reveal distinctive binding interfaces and conformations , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[9]  Palmer Taylor,et al.  Acrylodan-conjugated Cysteine Side Chains Reveal Conformational State and Ligand Site Locations of the Acetylcholine-binding Protein* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Ligand-induced conformational change in the alpha7 nicotinic receptor ligand binding domain. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[11]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Nanosecond Dynamics of the Mouse Acetylcholinesterase Cys69–Cys96 Omega Loop* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  A. Karlin Ion channel structure: Emerging structure of the Nicotinic Acetylcholine receptors , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Judith,et al.  Fluorescence energy transfer between cobra alpha-toxin molecules bound to the acetylcholine receptor. , 1984, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[14]  A. Karlin,et al.  Affinity oxidation of the reduced acetylcholine receptor. , 1970, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[15]  H. Lester,et al.  Conformation-dependent hydrophobic photolabeling of the nicotinic receptor: Electrophysiology-coordinated photochemistry and mass spectrometry , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  S. Taylor,et al.  Backbone flexibility of five sites on the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase in the open and closed conformations. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[17]  Igor Tsigelny,et al.  Tryptophan Fluorescence Reveals Conformational Changes in the Acetylcholine Binding Protein* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  A. Auerbach,et al.  The Role of Loop 5 in Acetylcholine Receptor Channel Gating , 2003, The Journal of general physiology.

[19]  S. Sine,et al.  Recent advances in Cys-loop receptor structure and function , 2006, Nature.

[20]  H. Grubmüller,et al.  Simulation of fluorescence anisotropy experiments: probing protein dynamics. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[21]  R. Maeda,et al.  Molecular dissection of subunit interfaces in the acetylcholine receptor: Identification of determinants of α-Conotoxin M1 selectivity , 1995, Neuron.

[22]  A. Auerbach,et al.  Gating Dynamics of the Acetylcholine Receptor Extracellular Domain , 2004, The Journal of general physiology.

[23]  A. Karlin,et al.  Effects of agonists and antagonists on the reactivity of the binding site disulfide in acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. , 1980, Biochemistry.

[24]  D. Eddins,et al.  Agonist-induced conformational changes in the extracellular domain of alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. , 2003, Molecular pharmacology.

[25]  T. Sixma,et al.  Crystal Structure of Acetylcholine-binding Protein from Bulinus truncatus Reveals the Conserved Structural Scaffold and Sites of Variation in Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  J. Newell,et al.  The GABAA Receptor α1 Subunit Pro174–Asp191 Segment Is Involved in GABA Binding and Channel Gating* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  A. P. Davenport,et al.  Nicotinic Acetylcholine receptors: from molecular biology to cognition , 2006 .

[28]  J. Daly Nicotinic Agonists, Antagonists, and Modulators From Natural Sources , 2005, Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology.

[29]  T. Sixma,et al.  Nicotine and Carbamylcholine Binding to Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors as Studied in AChBP Crystal Structures , 2004, Neuron.

[30]  T. Sixma,et al.  Crystal structure of an ACh-binding protein reveals the ligand-binding domain of nicotinic receptors , 2001, Nature.

[31]  D. Bertrand,et al.  Crystal structure of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor homolog AChBP in complex with an α-conotoxin PnIA variant , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[32]  Palmer Taylor,et al.  Nanosecond Dynamics of Acetylcholinesterase Near the Active Center Gorge* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  Steven M. Sine,et al.  Coupling of agonist binding to channel gating in an ACh-binding protein linked to an ion channel , 2004, Nature.

[34]  Todd T. Talley,et al.  Structural and Ligand Recognition Characteristics of an Acetylcholine-binding Protein from Aplysia californica* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  P. Taylor,et al.  Crystal structure of a Cbtx–AChBP complex reveals essential interactions between snake α‐neurotoxins and nicotinic receptors , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[36]  P. Taylor,et al.  Solution NMR of Acetylcholine Binding Protein Reveals Agonist-Mediated Conformational Change of the C-Loop , 2006, Molecular Pharmacology.

[37]  A. Auerbach,et al.  Dynamics of the acetylcholine receptor pore at the gating transition state. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.