Quasi-a priori mesh adaptation and extrapolation to higher order using τ-estimation

Abstract Improving the balance between cost and accuracy of computational fluid dynamics solvers by local mesh adaptation has become a topic of increasing interest. Numerical error based adaptation sensors proved to be robust and converge faster than sensors simply based on features of the flow field. However, this family of sensors known as residual-based sensors usually suffer from a high computational cost, e.g. the adjoint or Richardson extrapolation and are a posteriori indicators, which thus implies an initial solution to the problem. In this paper, we develop a mesh adaptation indicator accurate in the early stages of the iteration procedure, based on the τ -estimation technique. τ -estimation allows for an accurate truncation error estimation and can therefore be used to correct the discretized equations through the so-called τ -extrapolation methodology. We introduce the τ -estimation technique for non-converged solutions and derive all the necessary conditions to be used in the context of mesh adaptation and extrapolation of practical problems. Then, we apply this methodology to two-dimensional test cases, Euler flow past a NACA0012 airfoil in different Mach regimes, with a special focus on computational time. We demonstrate that quasi- a priori τ -estimation can substantially reduce the cost when combined with mesh adaptation or τ -extrapolation in comparison to classic adaptation sensors.

[1]  Eusebio Valero,et al.  Mesh adaptation and higher order extrapolation of the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations using τ-estimation , 2013 .

[2]  David Anthony Venditti,et al.  Grid adaptation for functional outputs of compressible flow simulations , 2000 .

[3]  Dimitri J. Mavriplis,et al.  Accurate Multigrid Solution of the Euler Equations on Unstructured and Adaptive Meshes , 1988 .

[4]  David L. Darmofal,et al.  Output-Based Error Estimation and Mesh Adaptation in Computational Fluid Dynamics: Overview and Recent Results , 2009 .

[5]  Mark E. Braaten,et al.  Three-Dimensional Unstructured Adaptive Multigrid Scheme for the Navier-Stokes Equations , 1996 .

[6]  Y. Kallinderis,et al.  New multigrid approach for three-dimensional unstructured, adaptive grids , 1994 .

[7]  T. Gerhold,et al.  On the Validation of the DLR-TAU Code , 1999 .

[8]  Achi Brandt,et al.  Multigrid Techniques: 1984 Guide with Applications to Fluid Dynamics, Revised Edition , 2011 .

[9]  Eusebio Valero,et al.  The estimation of truncation error by τ-estimation revisited , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..

[10]  Pascal Frey,et al.  Anisotropic mesh adaptation for CFD computations , 2005 .

[11]  Eusebio Valero,et al.  Comparison of Mesh Adaptation Using the Adjoint Methodology and Truncation Error Estimates , 2012 .

[12]  Y. Kallinderis,et al.  Adaptive refinement-coarsening scheme for three-dimensional unstructured meshes , 1993 .

[13]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Grid convergence for adaptive methods , 1991 .

[14]  Philip L. Roe,et al.  An Entropy Adjoint Approach to Mesh Refinement , 2010, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[15]  M. J. Aftosmis,et al.  Upwind method for simulation of viscous flow on adaptively refined meshes , 1994 .

[16]  Y. Kallinderis,et al.  Directional Viscous Multigrid Using Adaptive Prismatic Meshes , 1995 .

[17]  Harry A. Dwyer,et al.  Adaptive Grid Method for Problems in Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer , 1980 .