The IESSG, at the University of Nottingham, first initiated studies on the effects of ionospheric scintillation and Total Electron Content (TEC) gradients on GNSS users late in 2000. A network of four state-of-the-art GPS Ionospheric Scintillation Monitor receivers was set up in June 2001 to collect GPS phase and amplitude scintillation parameters, as well as TEC data, forming a Northern European monitoring network. Investigations were then carried out involving in particular the analysis of standalone GPS, DGPS, EGNOS aided DGPS and carrier phase user errors, which have been correlated with observed scintillation levels and with geomagnetic indices. A comprehensive statistical analysis was carried out, aiming to characterise ionospheric scintillation over Northern Europe. Amongst many results from our study, which mostly covered our 2002 data archive, analyses of occurrence of high levels of scintillation disturbing simultaneously a number of satellites showed that, on a day of enhanced geomagnetic activity, for up to nearly 2p of the time, two satellites may be concurrently affected. If it can be shown that scintillation levels over a certain threshold will lead to receiver loss of lock on satellites, then in addition to constellation geometry degradation, this may prove crucial during periods when only 4 or 5 satellites are in view. This scenario, of simultaneous failure of a number of satellites, is the consequential situation most likely to impact on the user community in Northern Europe, especially those involved in safety-critical applications. Also, SBAS (Satellite Based Augmentation Systems) reference stations may be adversely affected during these periods of time as they rely on both GPS carriers (L1 and L2) to compute ionospheric delay corrections for dissemination to users. This paper focuses on our latest results and includes further analyses involving isolated geomagnetically active periods as well as statistical analyses covering a larger part of our data archive (2002-2003), which have recently been carried out aiming to better establish the implications of ionospheric scintillation for GNSS users during the high of the solar cycle.
[1]
C. Rino,et al.
A power law phase screen model for ionospheric scintillation: 1. Weak scatter
,
1979
.
[2]
C. Valladares,et al.
Convection of polar cap patches observed at Qaanaaq, Greenland during the winter of 1989–1990
,
1994
.
[3]
Alan S. Rodger,et al.
Simultaneous two hemisphere observations of the presence of polar patches in the nightside ionosphere
,
1994
.
[4]
C. E. Valladares,et al.
Experimental evidence for the formation and entry of patches into the polar cap
,
1994
.
[5]
J. Aarons,et al.
Global positioning system phase fluctuations at auroral latitudes
,
1997
.
[6]
Anthony Finn,et al.
Ionospheric Effects on Global Positioning System Receivers
,
1998
.
[7]
G. D. Franceschi,et al.
Solar, ionospheric and geomagnetic indices
,
1998
.
[8]
John A. Klobuchar,et al.
Ionospheric Scintillation Effects in the Equatorial and Auroral Regions
,
2000
.
[9]
Marcio Aquino,et al.
Evaluation of the EGNOS Ionospheric Correction Model under Scintillation in Northern Europe
,
2002
.
[10]
C. Hegarty,et al.
Modeling the effects of ionospheric scintillation on GPS/Satellite‐Based Augmentation System availability
,
2003
.
[11]
Marcio Aquino,et al.
Statistical Analysis of GPS Ionospheric Scintillation and Short-Time TEC Variations Over Northern Europe
,
2003
.
[12]
Marcio Aquino,et al.
Implications of Ionospheric Scintillation for GNSS Users in Northern Europe
,
2005,
Journal of Navigation.