The application of qualitative risk assessment methodology to prioritize issues for fisheries management

Implementing more holistic forms of fisheries management (e.g. Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD), Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management) usually increases the number and scope of impacts requiring assessment. This study examined the effectiveness of a qualitative risk assessment process, developed as part of a National ESD framework, for prioritizing issues across the seven most valuable Western Australian commercial fisheries. Structured stakeholder workshops were used to identify issues across three ecological areas: retained species (i.e. target and by-product), non-retained (i.e. discarded and protected) species, and the broader ecosystem for each fishery. The risk associated with each issue was assessed using one of five sets of consequence criteria specifically developed to cover fishery-related impacts. The risk scores, for which suitably detailed justifications were written, determined the level of reporting and management required for each issue. Despite an additional 96 “non-target species issues” being identified at the workshops from a total of 115 issues, of the 27 issues requiring explicit management actions, just six new issues were added by this process. In addition, it identified where modifications of some of the existing arrangements were necessary. Finally, the system significantly improved stakeholder involvement and therefore acceptance of the outcomes. Given this success, risk assessment has now been applied to all Western Australia's export fisheries and to the development or review of many other systems, thereby improving the entire management process.

[1]  S. Dovers.  Discrete, consultative policy processes: lessons from the National Conservation Strategy for Australia and the National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development , 2003 .

[2]  Standards New Zealand.,et al.  Risk management guidelines: companion to AS/NZS 4360:2004 , 2004 .

[3]  R. I. C. C. Francis,et al.  Use of Risk Analysis to Assess Fishery Management Strategies: A Case Study using Orange Roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) on the Chatham Rise, New Zealand , 1992 .

[4]  Robert L. Stephenson,et al.  A framework for risk analysis in fisheries decision-making , 1998 .

[5]  Glenn W. Suter.  Ecological Risk Assessment , 1992 .

[6]  Keith Sainsbury,et al.  A flexible and practical framework for reporting on ecologically sustainable development for wild capture fisheries , 2005 .

[7]  M. J. Maceina,et al.  Use of a Split-Plot Analysis of Variance Design for Repeated-Measures Fishery Data , 1994 .

[8]  Gábor L. Lövei,et al.  Ecological risk assessment for Bt crops , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  K. Short.  Ecosystem-based Management of Marine Capture Fisheries , 2002 .

[10]  S. Garcia.  The ecosystem approach to fisheries : issues, terminology, principles, institutional foundations, implementation and outlook , 2003 .

[11]  R. Paine.  Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[12]  D. Brewer,et al.  Sustainability of fishery bycatch: a process for assessing highly diverse and numerous bycatch , 2001, Environmental Conservation.

[13]  R. I. C. C. Francis,et al.  "Risk" in fisheries management: a review , 1997 .

[14]  Keith Sainsbury,et al.  National ESD (Ecologically Sustainable Development) reporting framework for Australian fisheries: the how to guide for wild capture fisheries , 2002 .

[15]  J. Last.  Our common future. , 1987, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[16]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[17]  C. Stephen.  Role of risk assessment in fish health policy and management , 2001 .