Proteomic classification of acute leukemias by alignment-based quantitation of LC-MS/MS data sets.

Despite immense interest in the proteome as a source of biomarkers in cancer, mass spectrometry has yet to yield a clinically useful protein biomarker for tumor classification. To explore the potential of a particular class of mass spectrometry-based quantitation approaches, label-free alignment of liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) data sets, for the identification of biomarkers for acute leukemias, we asked whether a label-free alignment algorithm could distinguish known classes of leukemias on the basis of their proteomes. This approach to quantitation involves (1) computational alignment of MS1 peptide peaks across large numbers of samples; (2) measurement of the relative abundance of peptides across samples by integrating the area under the curve of the MS1 peaks; and (3) assignment of peptide IDs to those quantified peptide peaks on the basis of the corresponding MS2 spectra. We extracted proteins from blasts derived from four patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML, acute leukemia of myeloid lineage) and five patients with acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL, acute leukemia of lymphoid lineage). Mobilized CD34+ cells purified from peripheral blood of six healthy donors and mononuclear cells (MNC) from the peripheral blood of two healthy donors were used as healthy controls. Proteins were analyzed by LC-MS/MS and quantified with a label-free alignment-based algorithm developed in our laboratory. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of blinded samples separated the samples according to their known biological characteristics, with each sample group forming a discrete cluster. The four proteins best able to distinguish CD34+, AML, and ALL were all either known biomarkers or proteins whose biological functions are consistent with their ability to distinguish these classes. We conclude that alignment-based label-free quantitation of LC-MS/MS data sets can, at least in some cases, robustly distinguish known classes of leukemias, thus opening the possibility that large scale studies using such algorithms can lead to the identification of clinically useful biomarkers.

[1]  Rainer Breitling,et al.  msCompare: A Framework for Quantitative Analysis of Label-free LC-MS Data for Comparative Candidate Biomarker Studies* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[2]  Scott A. Shaffer,et al.  Genetic Variation Shapes Protein Networks Mainly through Non-transcriptional Mechanisms , 2011, PLoS biology.

[3]  John T. Wei,et al.  Transcriptome sequencing across a prostate cancer cohort identifies PCAT-1, an unannotated lincRNA implicated in disease progression , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Gavin Sherlock,et al.  DNA methylation profiling reveals novel biomarkers and important roles for DNA methyltransferases in prostate cancer. , 2011, Genome research.

[5]  Karin Noy,et al.  Shape-Based Feature Matching Improves Protein Identification via LC-MS and Tandem MS , 2011, J. Comput. Biol..

[6]  D. Roukos,et al.  Trastuzumab and beyond: sequencing cancer genomes and predicting molecular networks , 2011, The Pharmacogenomics Journal.

[7]  Jeffrey S. Morris,et al.  Reproducibility of SELDI Spectra Across Time and Laboratories , 2011, Cancer informatics.

[8]  H. Rodriguez,et al.  Reconstructing the pipeline by introducing multiplexed multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry for cancer biomarker verification: An NCI‐CPTC initiative perspective , 2010, Proteomics. Clinical applications.

[9]  George M Yousef,et al.  Personalized Medicine: Marking a New Epoch in Cancer Patient Management , 2010, Molecular Cancer Research.

[10]  Linfeng Wu,et al.  Role of spectral counting in quantitative proteomics , 2010, Expert review of proteomics.

[11]  O. Rennert,et al.  Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling reveals novel epigenetically regulated genes and non-coding RNAs in human testicular cancer , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  Tin-Lap Lee,et al.  DNA methylation of cancer genome. , 2009, Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews.

[13]  Krishna R. Kalari,et al.  Gemcitabine and Arabinosylcytosin Pharmacogenomics: Genome-Wide Association and Drug Response Biomarkers , 2009, PloS one.

[14]  T. Haferlach,et al.  Molecular diagnostics in acute leukemias , 2009, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[15]  Mona Singh,et al.  Protein quantification across hundreds of experimental conditions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  T. Golde,et al.  Rational targeting of Notch signaling in cancer , 2008, Oncogene.

[17]  Joshua N. Adkins,et al.  MASIC: A software program for fast quantitation and flexible visualization of chromatographic profiles from detected LC-MS(/MS) features , 2008, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[18]  Chuen Seng Tan,et al.  Proteomic data analysis workflow for discovery of candidate biomarker peaks predictive of clinical outcome for patients with acute myeloid leukemia. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[19]  Antoine H P America,et al.  Comparative LC‐MS: A landscape of peaks and valleys , 2008, Proteomics.

[20]  Lukas N. Mueller,et al.  An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[21]  Soheil Meshinchi,et al.  Identification of genes with abnormal expression changes in acute myeloid leukemia , 2008, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[22]  David R Goodlett,et al.  Genetic basis of proteome variation in yeast , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[23]  Lukas N. Mueller,et al.  SuperHirn – a novel tool for high resolution LC‐MS‐based peptide/protein profiling , 2007, Proteomics.

[24]  Kai A. Reidegeld,et al.  Protein labeling by iTRAQ: A new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research , 2007, Proteomics.

[25]  T. Südhof,et al.  Nicastrin Functions as a γ-Secretase-Substrate Receptor , 2005, Cell.

[26]  Jean-Charles Sanchez,et al.  MSight: An image analysis software for liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry , 2005, Proteomics.

[27]  Jeffrey S. Morris,et al.  Signal in noise: evaluating reported reproducibility of serum proteomic tests for ovarian cancer. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[28]  Jeffrey S. Morris,et al.  The importance of experimental design in proteomic mass spectrometry experiments: some cautionary tales. , 2005, Briefings in functional genomics & proteomics.

[29]  Yongyi Mao,et al.  Informatics Platform for Global Proteomic Profiling and Biomarker Discovery Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[30]  R. Gentleman,et al.  Gene expression profile of adult T-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia identifies distinct subsets of patients with different response to therapy and survival. , 2004, Blood.

[31]  T. Shaler,et al.  Quantification of proteins and metabolites by mass spectrometry without isotopic labeling or spiked standards. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[32]  M. Mann,et al.  Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture, SILAC, as a Simple and Accurate Approach to Expression Proteomics* , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[33]  S. Gygi,et al.  Correlation between Protein and mRNA Abundance in Yeast , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[34]  J. Yates,et al.  Method to correlate tandem mass spectra of modified peptides to amino acid sequences in the protein database. , 1995, Analytical chemistry.

[35]  B. Kamen CALLA and protein kinase CK2 revisited: targetable molecules for treating patients with leukemia? , 2010, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[36]  E. Marcotte,et al.  Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[37]  T. Südhof,et al.  Nicastrin functions as a gamma-secretase-substrate receptor. , 2005, Cell.