Problem-Centered Supplemental Instruction in Biology: Influence on Content Recall, Content Understanding, and Problem Solving Ability

To address the need for effective, efficient ways to apply active learning in undergraduate biology courses, in this paper, we propose a problem-centered approach that utilizes supplemental web-based instructional materials based on principles of active learning. We compared two supplementary web-based modules using active learning strategies: the first used Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction as a framework for organizing multiple active learning strategies; the second used a traditional web-based approach. Results indicated that (a) the First Principles group gained significantly from pretest to posttest at the Remember level (t(40) = −1.432, p = 0.08, ES = 0.4) and at the Problem Solving level (U = 142.5, N1 = 21, N2 = 21, p = .02, ES = 0.7) and (b) the Traditional group gained significantly from pretest to posttest at the Remember level (t(36) = 1.762, p = 0.043, ES = 0.6). Those in the First Principles group were significantly more likely than the traditional group to be confident in their ability to solve problems in the future (χ2 (2, N = 40) = 3.585, p = 0.09).

[1]  V. Shute Focus on Formative Feedback , 2008 .

[2]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  Teaching and learning science as argument , 2010 .

[3]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[4]  Gregory M. Francom,et al.  What is task-centered learning? , 2014 .

[5]  C. Brewer Near Real-Time Assessment of Student Learning and Understanding in Biology Courses , 2004 .

[6]  M. Merrill Levels of instructional strategy , 2006 .

[7]  H. Schmidt,et al.  Constructivist, Problem-Based Learning Does Work: A Meta-Analysis of Curricular Comparisons Involving a Single Medical School , 2009 .

[8]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[9]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Innovation in large lectures—teaching for active learning , 1997 .

[10]  John W. Collins,et al.  The Greenwood Dictionary of Education , 2003 .

[11]  N. Perrin,et al.  Using a simulation to teach food web dynamics , 1999 .

[12]  L. Garamszegi,et al.  Comparing effect sizes across variables: generalization without the need for Bonferroni correction , 2006 .

[13]  Gregory M. Francom,et al.  A Task-Centered Approach to Freshman-Level General Biology. , 2009 .

[14]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Split-test Bonferroni correction for QEEG statistical maps , 2008, Biological Cybernetics.

[15]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts? , 2005 .

[16]  Eugenia Etkina,et al.  Reformed Physics Instruction Through The Eyes Of Students , 2007 .

[17]  M. Segers,et al.  Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis , 2003 .

[18]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: “Physics Education Research—The Key to Student Learning” , 2001 .

[19]  Heather Leary,et al.  A Problem Based Learning Meta Analysis: Differences across Problem Types, Implementation Types, Disciplines, and Assessment Levels. , 2009 .

[20]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Toward a design theory of problem solving , 2000 .

[21]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[22]  D R Krathwohl,et al.  A REVISION OF BLOOMS TAXONOMY: AN OVERVIEW , 2002 .

[23]  Peter Armbruster,et al.  Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology. , 2009, CBE life sciences education.

[24]  Minsu Ha,et al.  “Force-Talk” in Evolutionary Explanation: Metaphors and Misconceptions , 2010, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[25]  Roger T. Lennon,et al.  Assumptions Underlying the Use of Content Validity , 1956 .

[26]  M. Segers,et al.  Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis , 2003 .

[27]  Jessica Watkins,et al.  Retaining Students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Majors , 2013 .

[28]  Mwangi Ndirangu,et al.  Effectiveness of a Computer-Mediated Simulations Program in School Biology on Pupils' Learning Outcomes in Cell Theory , 2004 .

[29]  Cheryl Tatano Beck,et al.  The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. , 2006, Research in nursing & health.

[30]  Paulette Robinson,et al.  Introductory biology courses: a framework to support active learning in large enrollment introductory science courses. , 2005, Cell biology education.

[31]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse , 2010, Science.

[32]  J. Michael Where's the evidence that active learning works? , 2006, Advances in physiology education.

[33]  Brian R. Belland,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Organizing Active Learning Experiences in Biology Instruction , 2012 .

[34]  C. Eick,et al.  Nonscience Majors' Perceptions on the Use of YouTube Video to Support Learning in an Integrated Science Lecture. , 2012 .

[35]  Michael J. Sanger,et al.  Can Computer Animations Affect College Biology Students' Conceptions About Diffusion & Osmosis? , 2001 .

[36]  David J. Sheskin,et al.  Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures , 1997 .

[37]  G. W. Saunders,et al.  In Defense of the Lecture , 2007 .

[38]  D. Krathwohl A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[39]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Results from a Range of Classrooms , 2002 .

[40]  R. Jeanne,et al.  Interactive Evolution Modules Promote Conceptual Change , 2010, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[41]  D. Sheskin Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[42]  C. Nelson Teaching evolution (and all of biology) more effectively: Strategies for engagement, critical reasoning, and confronting misconceptions. , 2008, Integrative and comparative biology.

[43]  M. David Merrill,et al.  First principles of instruction , 2012 .

[44]  Samuel Riffell,et al.  Using web-based instruction to improve large undergraduate biology courses: An evaluation of a hybrid course format , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[45]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[46]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Inclusion and Problem-Based Learning: Roles of Students in a Mixed-Ability Group , 2009 .

[47]  S. D. Kolstø Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues , 2001 .

[48]  Scott Freeman,et al.  Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[49]  Yvonne Hodgson,et al.  Engagement of students with lectures in biochemistry and pharmacology , 2012, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[50]  Brenda Sugrue,et al.  A Theory‐Based Framework for Assessing Domainl‐Specific Problem‐Solving Ability , 2005 .

[51]  Deborah Allen,et al.  Approaches to cell biology teaching: learning content in context--problem-based learning. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[52]  Stephen E. DiCarlo,et al.  Cell biology should be taught as science is practised , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.